BY JOSHUA COOLS, ESQ. AND JAY SCHUTTERT, ESQ.

While trials are on the decline, the pressures associated with trials are ever-present. Naturally, defense attorneys in personal injury and wrongful death cases are forced to make difficult decisions as to what to emphasize at trial. This, of course, can often be a difficult decision, especially considering that by the time the defense presents its case, the jury has already heard about the plaintiff’s theory of liability as well as the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. Among all the competing areas of emphasis, one of the most important trial strategy decisions is how much emphasis should be placed on liability versus damages during the defense case. Predictably, the appropriate defense strategy regarding the plaintiff’s injuries and damages is not one-size-fits-all. 12 Nevada Lawyer

January 2017

For example, imagine the following in a complex product liability case where liability is hotly contested and the injuries to the plaintiff are catastrophic. At trial, the plaintiff splits the trial testimony about 50-50 between liabilityrelated issues and the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. There is a significant amount of testimony related to the hardship that the plaintiff has endured as a result of her injuries, pain and suffering, and economic damages. By the time the plaintiff has rested her case, the jury has heard hours and hours of testimony related to her injuries and damages, emphasizing how sympathetic a figure she is and how her life has been changed by a truly catastrophic event. Now it is the defense’s turn to present their evidence. But which evidence should it present in order to

maximize the chance of prevailing on liability and obtaining a defense verdict? While the defense has evidence that the plaintiff is exaggerating her damages—e.g., she can still perform certain jobs undercutting her loss of earnings claim, she doesn’t need all the medical care that the plaintiff claims, the evidence of expenses for future medical care were not reasonable and customary, and so on—the defense must decide what evidence is most likely to sway the jury in the defense’s favor on liability. While it may be a bit axiomatic, the defense must focus on liability rather than damages, despite the temptation to fight over injuries and damages. The reason for resisting this urge is simple—if the jury doesn’t buy the defense’s liability case, they aren’t likely to buy the defense’s damages case. Furthermore, in catastrophic injury or wrongful death cases, damages can be an all-ornothing proposition. While there may

be disputes, for instance, over the allocation of general damages or how economic methods were applied to determine the future value of money in a life plan, defendants know that if they lose on the liability question, they are likely to suffer a significant verdict. And while every dollar counts, the difference between a verdict of $10 million and $9.5 million is relatively insignificant. Particularly in those cases, the emphasis must overwhelmingly be on liability. Furthermore, there is concern that by vehemently contesting the specifics of a plaintiff’s injuries damages during the defense case, a jury may view that as a concession that the defendant is liable and that the plaintiff is entitled to damages. This tactic may cause the jury to focus on the damages award

rather than the question of whether the defendant is liable at all. While the “concession effect” may ultimately have less impact than one might think, the concern is real. For these reasons, it is often advisable to spend less time on the damages questions and focus the bulk of the defense team’s energy and resources on the liability issues. One of the key ways to do this is by scoring the defense’s damages “points” on cross-examination with the plaintiff’s witnesses. This practice also avoids defense experts being used as pawns by plaintiffs’ lawyers to reaffirm the undisputed components of a plaintiff’s damages for use in closing. Instead of trotting out damages experts, the defense can use cross-examination to

continued on page 14

January 2017

Nevada Lawyer

13

continued from page 13 while a defense team needs to craft its strategy on a case-specific basis and should focus primarily on the liability issues in the case, it should be mindful of the potential effects of ignoring the plaintiff’s damages claims altogether. The takeaway for defense attorneys should be: get the limited concessions they need and not take up time in presenting their case. Obviously, ignoring damages altogether would be a mistake. Studies have shown that ignoring damages is less effective than providing a tailored and efficient counter to the plaintiff’s claimed injuries and damages.1 One 2014 study identified that the best strategy—without assessing the emphasis in the context of a trial as a whole—was to counter the plaintiff’s high damages demand with a suggested defense damages award of their own.2 A counterproposal of $50,000 to the plaintiff’s demand of $250,000 resulted in a 43 percent lower expected case value. This data suggests it is a sound strategy for the defense to include a counter to a plaintiff’s damage request that gives the jury a more reasonable number on which to peg any potential damages award. This request can be easily generated on cross-examinations with the plaintiff’s own damages expert.

For instance, if the plaintiff puts up an economist to opine as to current value the loss of earnings capacity claim, on crossexamination it is easy to get testimony as to what those damages calculations would be with different inputs (discount rates, etc.). The expert will almost always be able to adjust the calculations on the witness stand, giving the defense the numbers it wants. Similar points can be scored with a life care planner or other damages experts. This is an opportunity for the defense to provide the counteranchor to the plaintiff’s damages request without spending significant time focusing on damages. Another helpful observation from the 2014 study was that the participants of the study did not view a defendant’s proposal of a damages counter-anchor as necessarily being a concession of liability. This doesn’t mean that the defense should focus on damages, but should assuage concerns that any discussion of damages will be taken as a PROPER PREPARATION AND concession of PRESENTATION OF CASES IN THE liability. In COURT ANNEXED ARBITRATION PROGRAM fact, the study’s An Educational Program For Lawyers and Their scenario, in Legal Assistants and Paralegals which the defense had the Wednesday, February 22, 2017 greatest chance 8:00 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. - Registration of winning on 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. – Program liability, was Lloyd D. George Federal Courthouse the one in which Jury Assembly Room (1st Floor) the defense 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada countered with its own damages Registration Fee: $320 ADR Section Members: $160 number. In Legal Assistants and Paralegals: $160 contrast, when the defense 6.5 Credits (including 0.5 Ethics Credits) completely Lunch and Refreshments Served ignored the plaintiff’s For Reservations, Please Visit: number, its win http://www.nvbar.org/cle/liveseminars rate on liability Presented by the ADR Section of the State Bar of Nevada actually declined by nearly 20 percent. So,

14 Nevada Lawyer

January 2017

1. Spend the bulk of your resources on contesting liability; 2. Present limited evidence contesting damages, focusing the credibility and reasonableness of the plaintiff’s presentation; and 3. Respond to the plaintiff’s damages request with a counter-anchor. At least in cases where there are solid defenses to liability, a defense team should avoid the temptation of getting into a food fight with a plaintiff regarding injuries and damages. Instead, defendants will put themselves in the best position to win, or least reduce damages, if they keep the jury focused on liability and include a limited presentation of evidence related to damages. 1. John Campbell et al., Countering the Plaintiff’s Anchor: Jury Simulations to Evaluate Damages Arguments, 101 Iowa L. Rev. 543 (2016); Kagel, J., Damages: The Defense Attorney’s Dilemma, The Jury Expert 22 (1), 40-45 (2010); see also Bornstein, B., From Compassion to Compensation: The Effect of Injury Severity on Mock Jurors’ Liability Judgments, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 (16), 1477-1502 (1998). 2. John Campbell et al., Countering the Plaintiff’s Anchor: Jury Simulations to Evaluate Damages Arguments, 101 Iowa L. Rev. 543 (2016).

JAY SCHUTTERT is a partner at Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. His practice is concentrated in product liability defense, particularly automotive, pharmaceutical, medical device and consumer/industrial products. His practice also includes defense of catastrophic tort cases and commercial litigation matters. JOSHUA COOLS is an associate at Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. His practice consists primarily of civil litigation and is concentrated in product liability defense, particularly automotive, pharmaceutical, medical device and consumer/industrial products. His practice also includes defense of catastrophic tort cases and commercial litigation matters.

While trials are on the decline, the pressures ... - Snell & Wilmer

Feb 28, 2017 - This, of course, can often be a difficult decision, especially considering that by the .... liability defense, particularly automotive, pharmaceutical ...

1MB Sizes 3 Downloads 158 Views

Recommend Documents

Snell & Wilmer Paint the Town
Apr 27, 2014 - plant, harvest and cook their way to a healthier lifestyle. ... art gallery for their annual Paint the Town event. Conference tables, rolling chairs, and coffee tables are carted away and replaced ... Call AFAN. Development Director ..

Snell & Wilmer Paint the Town
Apr 27, 2014 - much about building up the arts in Las Vegas as about assisting AFAN. The mutually ... smartphone app turns bidding on the art into a game.

Views on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ... - Snell & Wilmer
Jun 28, 2016 - written in 1991, were clearly designed to apply to the harassing and ... give their cellular telephone numbers to companies as a preferred point ...

Snell&Wilmer
Sep 19, 2016 - service mark is the same as a trademark, but distinguishes services instead of goods. Trade dress is .... trademark cancellations and domain name disputes; and preparing manufacturing, consulting and technology contracts.

Views on the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ... - Snell & Wilmer
Jun 28, 2016 - Moreover, the rules regarding calls to cellular phones were drafted a long ... a consumer has Article III standing to pursue claims. The Supreme ...

Snell&Wilmer
Sep 19, 2016 - Best to select a unique mark that is either an invented word with no meaning ... obtain state registration, regardless of the area of geographical use in the state. ... the mark and buy products based on the quality/reputation associat

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Announces ... - Snell & Wilmer
May 27, 2014 - electromechanical, computer software, medical products, acoustics and ... Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm ...

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Announces ... - Snell & Wilmer
May 27, 2014 - electromechanical, computer software, medical products, acoustics and ... Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm ...

Snell&Wilmer - JD Supra
Nov 15, 2016 - Many businesses ... internet searching software would likely be found to conflict with “Google.” III. ... banking or insurance, the records of the appropriate agency responsible for registering such names should be searched and.

Cybersecurity - Snell & Wilmer
Sep 30, 2016 - 25% of all of the data breaches that we hear about and ... when there is a data breach or cyber. DANIELLE ... no matter how small or large, can.

November 2016 - Snell & Wilmer
Nov 22, 2016 - the beneficent author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be; that ... such a degree of temporal prosperity as He alone knows to be best.

PRESS RELEASE - Snell & Wilmer
Jan 18, 2017 - Adobe. RealSource. Price-CCIM Scholarship. Katie Wilking Clinard ... that requires 100+ hours of training and considerable investment. Learn.

Snell&Wilmer - JD Supra
Nov 15, 2016 - “apple pie a la mode” is descriptive or generic of apple pie with ice cream. But, its acronym, “APALM,” would likely be considered a fanciful, ...

September 2017 - Snell & Wilmer
Sep 12, 2017 - (Cleaned up). Litigation—Slander ... App.5th 603 (2017), held that a plaintiff must make a ... in the amount of $1,000, plus costs and “including.

IP Stars - Snell & Wilmer
May 30, 2017 - In addition, he has worked with a number of technology clients to develop ... Throughout his career, Langton has prepared and prosecuted U.S. and foreign patent applications and handled large patent ... For more information,.

IP Stars - Snell & Wilmer
PHOENIX (May 30, 2017) – Snell & Wilmer is pleased to announce that for the third ... hardware, internet, business methods, solar tracking, financial services, ...

IP Stars - Snell & Wilmer
Jun 22, 2016 - biotechnical, mechanical, electromechanical, computer software, medical ... de-facto Chief Patent Counsel for several Fortune 500 companies. ... subterranean drilling, all aspects of automobile technology, semiconductor and ...

Ranking Arizona - Snell & Wilmer
Apr 17, 2017 - ... business leaders throughout Arizona, participated in an online opinion poll ... company's revenue and number of employees. About Snell & Wilmer. Founded in 1938, Snell & Wilmer is a full-service business law firm with ...

September 2017 - Snell & Wilmer
5 days ago - who created the writing or the law firm that employs the attorney? In Tucker Ellis LLP v. Superior Court, 12. Cal.App.5th 1233, 220 Cal.Rptr.3d ...

The meal-break battle - Snell & Wilmer
Dec 1, 2014 - company has waged a legal bat- tle over whether a ... impact on the company's rates, routes or ... California rules apply,” he said. Mills spoke at ...

PRESS RELEASE - Snell & Wilmer
Salt Lake City, UT–March 6, 2017–The Utah Chapter of CCIM honored 16 individuals at its 2017. Excellence Awards event. Held at the Grand America Hotel on ...

Cybersecurity - Snell & Wilmer
Sep 30, 2016 - the last ten or fifteen years. Let's start ... and social engineering. To level set the ... it will help harden your networks ... (UAT) into a unique all-STEM institution that marries the best ..... part of larger systematic campaign.