USOORE43149E

(19) United States (12) Reissued Patent

(10) Patent Number:

Bybell et a].

(45) Date of Reissued Patent:

(54) METHOD FOR GENERATINGA HALFTONE

2 ,

OFA SOURCE IMAGE

-

s 1 21s 1 (at

1/1982 Iwakura

4,347,518 A

Inventors: Daniel P. Bybell, Medford, MA (US); Jay E. Thornton, Watertown, MA (US); Dana F. Schuh, Windham, NH (US) .

.

-

-

(73) Asmgnee: Senshln Capital, LLC, Wllmlngton, DE (Us)

8/1982 Williams et al.

4,364,063 4,385,302 4,391,535 4,415,908

A A A A

12/1982 5/1983 7/ 1983 11/1983

4,443,121

4,447,818 A

A

4/1984

Filed:

4,464,669 A

8/1984 Sekiya 61 a1.

Feb. 14, 2008

'

FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS EP

0 619 188

10/1994

(Continued)

Related US. Patent Documents

Reissue of:

(51)

Ar

(commued)

(Under 37 CFR 147)

(64)

Anno et a1, Morigichi et a1. Palmer Sugiura

5/1984 Kuita et 31‘

(21) Appl. No.2 12/031,151 (22)

Jan. 31, 2012

ff}??? iii 31

,

4,309,712 A

_

(75)

US RE43,149 E

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

patent NO':

6,999,202

Digital Halftoning, Robert Ulichney, Cambridge, MA, The MIT P

Issued:

Feb“ 14’ 2006

Appl. No.2

09/817,932

Filed:

Mar. 27, 2001

Int. Cl. G06K 1 5/00

(2006-01)

H04N1/405

(2006.01)

(1987) ISBN 0 262 21009 6 (:11 1 fess





'

'

' ’

5

ap er

d6 a“

'

(Continued) Primary Examiner * Thomas D Lee (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Woodcock Washburn LLP

(52)

US. Cl. .................................... .. 358/306; 358/313

(57)

(58)

Field of Classi?cation Search ............... .. 358/306,

In one aspect of the present invention, a method is provided

358/535, 536’ 534’ 3'18, 3'17, 3'16, 3'15,

for producing a halftone of a source image. The halftone

_

includes halftone pixels. The halftone pixels are suitable for

_

358/314, 3'13

ABSTRACT

See apphcanon ?le for complete “321er hlswry'

containing halftone dots. The method selects glyphs corre

_ References Clted

3,820,133 A

6/1974 Adorney et 31'

sponding to intensities of regions (e.g., pixels) in the source image. The glyphs contain one or more halftone dots. The method locates halftone dots Within the halftone pixels such that for at least one pair of halftone dots contained Within a pair of halftone pixels sharing a common boundary, the half

3,864,708 A

2/1975

t

(56)

U'S' PATENT DOCUMENTS 4,070,587 A

Allen

1/1978 Hanakata

4,072,973 A

2/1978 Mayo

4,089,017 A

5/1978 Buldini

4,154,523 A

5/1979 Rising et a1.

one

d

-

h

-

ots 1n t e pa1r o

fh H

-

1

a tone p1xe s exten

directions from the common boundary.

49 Claims, 27 Drawing Sheets

For each 2X2 array A‘ of pixels in the source image

For each pixel P in A, (X5, Y3) = coordinates of P in the source image

1106

(XA. YA) = coordinates of P

In As Select glyph G corresponding to L'

'

of P

Select dot D at

coordinates (XA, YA) in G Generate D at coordinates

1114

(X5, Y5) in halftone End Loop P ’

End Loop As

1118

d -

-

1n opposne

US RE43,149 E Page2 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

5,835,627 A

11/1998 Higgins et a1.

151333 52:3“ng

4,514,738 A

4/1985 Nagato etal.

2’22??? A

4,524,368 A 4,540,992 4,563,691 A

6/1985 Inuietal. 9/1985 1/1986 Noguchietal. Motekietal.

5’880’777 A 5’889’546 5’897’254 A

M999 S W '1 4/1999 M999 Tanakaetal

4,607,262 A

8/1986 Moriguchietal.

5’913’019 A

6/1999 A

4,638,372 A

1/ 1987 Leng etal'

5,956,067 A

9/1999 13:32 eirfl

8/1987

1

5,956,421 A

4,738,526 A

49% £3:th1116‘”

5,970,224 A

10/1999 Salgado etal.

43739344 A

4/1988 Sullivan et a1.

g’ggg’égg A

151333 53:21:11

4,777,496 A

10/1988 Maejimaetal.

5’999’204 A

12/1999 KO-ima

6,005,596 A 6’028’957 A

12/1999 Yonhida et a1. 20000 Katorietal

4,805,033 A 4,809,063 A

8/1987

K

.



“989 Nishikawa 2/1989 Moriguchiet a1.



'

4,686,549 A

A688 051 A

Williams etal.

b

9/1999

'

Tanakaetal. ............... .. 382/172

'

4,884,080 A

11/1989 Hiraharaetal.

6’069’982 A

5/2000 Reuman

4,933,709 A

6/1990 Manico etal.

6’104’421 A

800% Metal

4,962,403 A

10/1990 Goodwinetal.

6’104’468 A

80000 Bg

6,104,502 A

8/2000 SthIIll ........................ .. 358/1.9

5006 866 A

5,045,952 A ’

4/1991

Someya

i

2,8225%? A



9/1991 Eschbach



-

'

'k- t 1

r-yma-rs ‘e 3'

.

6,106,173 A

8/2000

$133} Alewoiftetal'

6,108,105 A

8/2000 Takeuchi et a1. ............ .. 358/455

Suzuki etal.

5086306 A

2/1992 Sufi? “1

6,128,099 A

10/2000 Delabastia

5,086,484 A 5,109,235 A

2/1992 K“ 1 31 49% smegma ~

6,128,415 A 6,133,983 A

10/2000 Hultgren,IIIetal. 10/2000 Wheeler

6,157,459 A

12/2000 Shiotaetal.

5,115,252 A

5/1992 Sasak!

5,130,821 A

7/1992 Nas 1

5,132,703 A

7/1992 N‘ik ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~

5,132,709 A 5:162:813 A

7/1992 Wesfyama 2/1993 S

5,208,684 A

5/1993 Itg‘i‘moto

.

5’244’861 A

9/1993 Cam belletal

5,248,995 A

9/1993 I

P

~

12/1993 Szai?noto

5:285:220 A

2/1994 Suzuki etal.

5307425 A

4/1994 0



~

11/1992 Kuroiwa et a1.

5184150 A

5,268,706 A

358615



k

6,172,768 B1

1/2001 Yamadaetal.

6,186,683 B1

2/2001 Shibuki

6,204,940 B1

3/2001 Linetal.

6’208’429 B1

3/2001 Anderson

6,226,021 B1

5/2001 Kobayashletal.

6,233,360 B1

5/2001 Melenlleelnl.

6,243,133 B1

6/2001 Spauldlngetal.

6,263,091 B1

7/2001 Jalnetal.

6,282,317 B1

8/2001 Luoetal.

6’293’651 B1

9/2001 saw‘m"

6,402,283 B2

ts“ ‘1

6/2002 Schulte

6,425,699 B1

7/2002

5,323,245 A

6/1994 Rylander .................... .. 358/536

6447186 B1

9/2002 0

5,333,246 A 5,422,662 A

7/1994 Nagasaka 6/1995 Fukushima etal

6’456’388 B1 6,462,835 B1

5,450,099 A

9/1995

Stephenson et a1.



5469 203 A

11/1995 Hauschild

5:479:263 A

12/1995 Jacobs et a1. ................ .. 358/298

5,497,174 A

5521626 A

3/1996



6,501,566 B1

Stephany et a1.

. 358/1.9

g’ggg’gig 5% ’



Dovaletal.

h- t 31

9/2002 Iguc ‘tel ' 10/2002 50011151512631. -

12/2002 Ishlguro etal.

gggg;

etal' -

5/1996 Tanakaet a1

6,567,111 B2

5/2003 K011maetal.

5,569,347 53539443 A

10/1996 7/1996 Obataetal. Mushika et a1.

6’608’926 B1 5%

2588; 800% Suwa

5,576,745 A

11/1996

5602653 A

Matsubara

2/1997 Cur

5,617,223 A

4/1997 Burgysé't'gl"""""""""" "

5:623:297 A 5,623,581 A 5,625,399 A



358/454



6,614,459 B2

/

'

--

31

92003 Fu]_1m0t0et

6,628,417 B1

9/2003 Nalto etal.

4/1997 Austin etal.

223%; 5%

3588; 3911‘“ t 1

4/1997 Attenberg 4/1997 Wiklofetal.

6’628’899 B1 6’650’771 Bl

9/2003 Kama“ 3' 11/2003 @ka

.

5,642,148 A

6/1997 Fukushimaetal.

6’661’443 B2

120%} B b 11

5,644,351 A

7/1997 Matsumoto etal.

6’671’063 B1

12/2003 Iii; eta'

5,646,672 A

7/1997 Fukushima

6’690’488 B1

2/2004 Reuman

2,2231%; A

3133; ?g)?“

6,694,051 B1

2/2004 Yamazoe et a1.

53694484 5,703,644 A

g’Zéé’igg ’ ’ g?

ggggj

5706 044 A

1/1998 Fuk h.

6,762,855 B1

7/2004 Goldbergetal.

5,707,082 A 5,711,620 A

1/1998 M “Sh‘ma 1/1998 Sagiztal

6,819,347 B2 6,826,310 B2

11/2004 Saquibetal. 11/2004 Trifonovetal.

537193615 A

2/1998 Hashiguchietal‘

6,842,186 B2

1/2005 Bouchardetal.

5721578 A

2/1998 Nak. t 1

6,906,736 B2

6/2005 Bouchardet al.

5724456 A

3/1998 B 311‘: 1'1

6,937,365 B2

8/2005 Gorianetal.

5,729,274 A

3/1998 SOY“ e ’1'

6,956,967 B2

10/2005 Gindele etal.

5,757,976 A

5/1998 Sills)

6,999,202 B2

2/2006 Bybelletal.

5:777:599 A

7/1998 P0duska,Jr. ................ .. 345/136

983952 5;

$882 (Sjorlneno “31'

5781315 A

7/1998 Yamaguchi

5,784,092 A 5,786,837 A

7/1998 Fukuoka 7/1998 Kaeltsetal.

7,127,108 B2 7,129,980 B1

10/2006 KlIIJO etal. 10/2006 A3111?"

5786 900 A

7/1998 Sawano

7,154,621 B2

12/2006 Rodrlguezetal.

A

12/1997 Cottrell Morietal. et a1.

1





Katsumaet

82-May

Nimuraetal.

5,808,653 A

9/1998 Matsumoto et a1.

7,167,597 B2

1/2007 Mat§ush1ma

5,809,164 A

9/1998 Hultgren, 111

7,200,265 B2

4/2007 Ima1_

5,809,177 A 5,818,474 A 5,818,975 A

9/1998 Metcalfe et a1. 10/1998 Takahashi et :11. 10/1998 Goodwin etal.

7,224,476 B2 7,260,637 B2 7,272,390 B1

5/2007 YOShlda 8/2007 Kato 9/2007 Adachietal.

5,835,244 A

11/1998 Bestmann

7,283,666 B2

10/2007 Saquib

US RE43,149 E Page 3 7,336,775 B2

2/2008 Tanaka et al.

Knox et al., “Threshold Modulation in Error Diffusion,” SPIE, 1993,

7,355,732 B2 7,548,260 B2

4/2008 Yamaguchi 6/2009 Yamaguchi

2(3), 185-192. Taguchi et al., “New Thermal Offset Printing Employing Dye Trans fer Technology (Tandem TOP-D),” NIP] 7.‘ International Conference on Digital Printing Technologies, Sep. 2001, vol. 17, pp. 499-503. Pratt, W.K., “Digital Image Processing,” Wiley & Sons, 1978, 311

7,557,950 2003/0021478 2004/0073783 2004/0179226 2004/0207712 2005/0005061 2005/0219344

B2 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1 A1

7/2009 1/2003 4/2004 9/2004 10/2004 1/2005 10/2005

Hatta et al. Yoshida Ritchie Burkes et al. Bouchard et al. Robins Bouchard

2007/0036457 A1

2/2007 Saquib

2009/0128613 A1

5/2009 Bouchard et al.

FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP EP GB JP JP JP JP JP JP

0 625 425 0626611 0 454 495 0 791 472 0 762 736 0 773 470 0 939 359 1 004 442 1 056 272 1 078 750 1 137 247 1 201 449 0 204 094 1 392 514 0 933 679 2 356 375 58-164368 59-127781 01040371 02-248264 02-289368 03-024972

11/1994 11/1994 7/1996 2/1997 3/1997 5/1997 9/1999 5/2000 11/2000 2/2001 9/2001 10/2001 7/2003 9/2005 4/2008 5/2001 9/1983 7/1984 2/1989 10/1990 11/1990 2/1991

JP JP JP JP JP JP JP JP JP JP JP JP KR W0 W0 W0 W0 W0 W0 W0 W0 W0

4-119338 06 183033 06 266514 6-308632 9-138465 09167129 2000-050077 2000-050080 2000-184270 2001-160908 2001-273112 2003-008986 2001-0037684 W0 99 53415 WO 00/04492 WO 01/01669 W0 01 31432 W0 02 078320 W0 02/096651 W0 03/071780 WO 2004/077816 W0 2005 006200

4/1992 7/1994 9/1994 11/1994 5/1997 6/1997 2/2000 2/2000 6/2000 6/2001 10/2001 1/2003 5/2001 10/1999 1/2000 1/2001 5/2001 10/2002 12/2002 8/2003 9/2004 1/2005

OTHER PUBLICATIONS Bhukhanwala et al., “Automated Global Enhancement of Di gitalized Photographs,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Feb.

3 18.

Weston et al., “Adaptive Margin Support Vector Machines,” Advances in Large Margin Classi?ers, 2000, 281-296. Wong, P.W., “Adaptive Error Diffusion and Its Application in Multiresolution Rendering,” IEEE Trans. On Image Processing, 1996, 5(7), 1184-1196. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Restriction Requirement

dated Sep. 30, 2003, US. Appl. No. 10/078,644, ?led Feb. 19, 2002. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 2, 2003, US. Appl. No. 10/080,883, ?led Feb. 2, 2002. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action dated Mar. 29, 2004, US. Appl. No. 10/080,883, ?led Feb. 22, 2002. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Sep. 22, 2004, US. Appl. No. 10/078,644, ?led Feb. 19,2002. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Notice of Allowance

dated Sep. 23, 2004, US. Appl. No. 10/080,883, ?led Feb. 22, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Nov. 29, 2004, US. Appl. No. 09/817,932, ?led Mar. 27, 2001. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Nov. 29, 2004, US. Appl. No. 09/870,537, ?led May 30,2001. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Notice of Allowance

dated Feb. 22, 2005, US. Appl. No. 10/078,644, ?led Feb. 19,2002. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Notice of Allowance

dated May 9, 2005, US. Appl. No. 09/870,537, ?led May 30,2001. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Notice of Allowance

datedAug. 31, 2005, US. Appl. No. 09/817,932, ?led Mar. 27, 2001. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action dated Jul. 13, 2006, US. Appl. No. 10/375,440, ?led Feb. 27, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Final Of?ce Action dated Dec. 4, 2006, US. App. No. 10/375,440, ?led Feb. 27, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Notice of Allowance

dated May 29, 2007, US. Appl. No. 10/375,440, ?led Feb. 27,2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 29, 2007, US. Appl. No. 10/611,737, ?led Jul. 1, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Restriction Requirement

dated Sep. 4, 2007, US. Appl. No. 10/844,286, ?led May 12, 2004. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Notice of Allowance

dated Sep. 6, 2007, US. Appl. No. 10/375,440, ?led Feb. 27, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Oct. 4, 2007, US. Appl. No. 10/611,737, ?led Jul. 1, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Nov. 14, 2007, US. Appl. No. 10/844,286, ?led May 12, 2004. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Mar. 20, 2008, US. Appl. No. 10/844,286, ?led May 12, 2005. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Jun. 18, 2008, US. Appl. No. 10/611,737, ?led Jul. 1, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Final Of?ce Action dated

Sep. 12, 2008, US. Appl. No. 10/844,286, ?led May 12,2004. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Restriction Requirement dated Oct. 8, 2008, US. Appl. No. 11/546,633, ?led Oct. 12, 2006. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Final Of?ce Action dated

1994.

Jan. 28, 2009, US. Appl. No. 10/611,737, ?led Jul. 1,2003.

Damera-Venkata et al., “Adaptive Threshold Modulation for Error

United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

Diffusion Halftoning,” IEEE Trans. On Image Processing, 2001,

10(1),104-116. Gonzalez et al., “Digital Image Processing,” Addison-Wesley, 1977, 1 19-126.

Hann, RA. et al., “Chemical Technology in Printing and Imaging Systems”, TheRoyal Society ofChemistry, , Special Publication. 133 (1993), pp. 73-85. Hann, RA. et al., “Dye Diffusion Thermal Transfer (D2T2) Color Printing”, Journal ofImaging Technology, 16 (6). (1990), pp. 238 241.

Kearns et al., “Algorithmic Stability and Sanity-Check Bounds for Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation,” XP-002299710, Jan. 1997, 1-20.

dated Jan. 30, 2009, US. Appl. No. 11/546,633, ?led Oct. 12,2006. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated May 21, 2009, US. Appl. No. 10/844,286, ?led May 12, 2004. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Restriction Requirement

dated May 26, 2009, US. Appl. No. 11/546,633, ?led Oct. 12,2006. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Non-Final Of?ce Action

dated Jun. 10, 2009, US. Appl. No. 10/611,737, ?led Jul. 1, 2003. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: Final Of?ce Action dated

Jul. 9, 2009, US. Appl. No. 11/546,633, ?led Oct. 12,2006. United States Patent and Trademark Of?ce: US. Appl. No.

11/847,894, ?led Aug. 30, 2007, Gorian et al. International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) dated Jun. 30, 2003, PCT/US02/015546.

US RE43,149 E Page 4 EP Communication issued by the Examining Division Apr. 2, 2004,

International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) dated Sep. 17,

EP13925 14.

2003, PCT/US02/0 l 5913.

International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) issued Sep. 2,

EP Communication issued by the Examining Division May 29, 2009,

2005, PCT/U S04/ 004964.

EP 1479220.

EP Communication issued by the Examining Division Jan. 11, 2006,

EP Communication issued by the Examining Division May 23, 2006,

International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) dated Jan. 29, 2003, PCT/USO2/008954. EP Communication issued by the Examining Division Jul. 7, 2009,

EP 1 5979 l l .

EP 13745 57.

International Preliminary Examination Report (IPER) issued Jan. 3, 2006, PCT/US04/02098 1.

* cited by examiner

EP 1 5979 l l .

US. Patent

Jan.31,2012

US RE43,149 E

Sheet10f27

.QIw“ .91m»

mace

32\

awe?

.QEn:

Uv6E m or

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 2 0f 27

US RE43,149 E

umo/m

ouo/ m

/nwom mw/ ou

m“.GE

om/ ou

MN.91

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 3 or 27

US RE43,149 E

a

N

2"

9' IL

a

/

g

22‘ l-L

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 4 or 27

US RE43,149 E

306

3023

302b

392C

302d

\

\

\

\

\ 300 304

FIG. 3A

308a

302a \

302b

3026

\

\

302d y

\ 300

FIG. 3B

304

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 5 or 27

US RE43,149 E

310C

Ili i l l l | |I| | | | 3023

302b

302C

302d

\

\

\

\

300

FIG. 3C

US. Patent

Jan.31,2012

Sheet60f27

US RE43,149 E

400

402b

4023

0+00. .

FIG. 4A

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 7 or 27

4123

US RE43,149 E

412b

\\

\\

410

418

416

4126 304

FIG. 4B

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

502a

Sheet 8 or 27

502b

\\

\\

504b

504d

502c

FIG. 5A

\502d

US RE43,149 E

500

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 9 or 27

514d

FIG. 5B

US RE43,149 E

/512d

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

522a

\\

Sheet 10 or 27

522b

\\

524d

US RE43,149 E

520

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 11 0127

522b

\\

522a

5220

FIG. 50

522d

US RE43,149 E

520

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 12 or 27

522b

\\

522a

5226

FIG. 5E

522d

US RE43,149 E

520

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 14 0f 27

US RE43,149 E

‘;;?0 6123

612b

6120

614a

6146

616

618

612d

612f

\ 614d

e129

614i

6149

\ 614h

612h

US. Patent

Jan. 31, 2012

Sheet 16 or 27

US RE43,149 E

630

632a

\

632b

632c

\ 634c

632d

632f

634f

6329

6349

632i

632h

FIG. GD

United States

Feb 14, 2008 - Primary Examiner * Thomas D Lee. G06K 1 5/ 00. (2006-01). (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Woodcock Washburn LLP. H04N1/405. (2006.01).

2MB Sizes 3 Downloads 301 Views

Recommend Documents

United States
Sep 6, 2006 - See application ?le for complete search history. LLP. (56) .... Khosrowpour sentation downloaded from , (product. 5,999,952 A. 12/1999 Jenkins et al. to be released Mar. 1, 1997) 20 pages, unknown date. ... Windows/Article/ArticleID/ 30

United States
Nov 13, 2006 - include the business environment of the recommendation ... Dynamic Consumer Pro?ling and Tiered Pricing Using Software. Agents, Prithviraj ...

United States District Court United States District Court
Mar 17, 2006 - The subpoena also required the companies to produce the text of users' search ..... effectiveness of content filtering software," (Reply at 3:2-5) the Court is ..... In the development or implementation of the protocol, Google shall ..

(19) United States
Cyclosporins, British patent application 2222770 A discloses galenic formulations ... Ascomycins, of Which FK-506 and ascomycin are the best known, comprise ...

(19) United States
Patent Application Publication May 10, 2012 Sheet 1 0f 8. US 2012/0113143 ..... as those forAndroid (Android is a trademark of Google, Inc.) and more recently ...

United States
Oct 26, 2010 - 1999, now Pat. No. 6,256,683. _. _. (60) Provisional application No. 60/113,637, ?led on ... Virtual to physical process. See application ?le ... LOCAL. MEMORY. 2022. 205. ' N205. ~/- 201. V2021 u. V202. 'r1. -' LMI -. OMA ..---.

(19) United States
H04N 9/74. (2006.01). (11). The replacement of the data for the run length coding ...... A machine readable storage device, in particular an optical disc, having ...

(19) United States
7/1997 Tipton et al. 5,864,397 ... into a chemical Vessel through a small diameter ?tting While. G01] 3/44 ... Molecular spectroscopy is a family on analytical tech.

(19) United States
Thus, a cell voltage (V c) that is a sum of the wall voltage. (Vw) and .... select cells C roW by roW. .... the sustain pulse Ps is applied to the main electrodes XliXn.

United States
check valve as the ?uid volume in front of the piston is compressed. Due to the proportional relationship betWeen pressure and area, a magni?cation of force ...

(19) United States
ring information regarding fax pages and the actual content of the fax message. ..... reason, access servers in the IP netWork 46 are also called data pumps.

(19) United States
(75) Inventors: Rick C. Stevens, Apple Valley, MN ... An optical sensing device uses a set of source mirrors direct ..... ena of interest at discrete times t1 and t2.

(19) United States
(58) Field of Classi?cation Search . .... software according to the requirements of resolution, total track (TT) ... While connecting the compound lens with the basic.

(19) United States
105: PLSIGNAL cmcun. 105. 102. 'R 108 ; ANTEN'IA. SPSOEQE'SNG. 107. 0 103-1. &. 101 :gmsmume. RAD'O. MULTIPLEX. SPREADMG 104" SEPARATION.

(19) United States
Ames test and have a PII, or skin irritation, value of 2 or less. 6 Claims, No ..... bad been added, and histidine-free media devoid of the meta bolically active ...

United States
duced in the second chamber When injected into the pro cessing chamber ioniZes the halogen gas creating a dense, ion-ion plasma in the processing chamber that is continuous in time. A method for creating an ion-ion plasma continuous in time. 3 Claims

(19) United States
ing energy to the ?rst translation module and the light sources. Moreover, a second translation module connects with the light sources and the image capture ...

United States Patent
Jun 10, 1999 - Sep. 3, 2002. (54) INK JET INK COMPOSITION. W0. WO 00/27935. 5/2000. (75) Inventors: Wan Kang Zou; Xiaomang Wang,. OTHER PUBLICATIONS. (73). (*). (21) .... (List continued on next page.) Primary Examiner—Helene Klemanski. Assistant E

(19) United States
aspects, advantages, and novel features of the invention are described herein. .... metadata into custom playlists, (i.e., lists of tracks that the user Wants played in a ... installed in a dynamic link library, or may be Written in an interpretive l

(19) United States
Mar 22, 2002 - a catalyst for the production of a polyurethane foam With speci?c properties. ... tion to too high a degree, carbon dioxide Will be evolved before suf?cient ..... used in automotive seating) containing a catalyst such as the.

United States
See application ?le for Complete Search history of penetrator .... ticularly to ceramic and multi-impact penetrators to deepen a crater in the ... delivered from an aerial platform due to payload mass and other design .... are under development.

(19) United States
12, there is some cell phone designed such ... display surface of a sub liquid crystal display panel 7 smaller ... the display portion housing 2 of the cell phone.

(19) United States
knoWn to those skilled in the art of the present invention. In another embodiment .... illustration and not as a limitation, a reporting station 330 may be deployed at ...

(19) United States
alloW external storage of the recorded voice data irrespective of Whether poWer of the mobile radio telephone is on or off. As previously stated, in accordance ...