Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem

a ’ T e e - If P is positive prime and a is any integer such that P is not a ,

divisor of a do that



.

= , therefore if the no. . . ………… − , are divided by P. The remainders are . . … … … … − , placed in some order so that.

Prove: Since The product

Now

.

,



= , then

…………



, the product . .

…………



……………





−−−−−−−−



−−−−−−− ≡

Multiplying these congruence relations,



. . …………

.





.

………… −

!

Since P is prime, therefore,



=





=

.

. . ………… −

And Hence

By cancelling P −



,

!

, ,

,







= ,

…………







……….

……….

= ,

= ,

! =

! from both sides of the congruence relation (2), −

|

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17







=



E-mail: [email protected] Page 1

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem e ’s Theorem- If m is a positive integer and a is any integer such that ,

then �

=

.

Proof: Let { .

……….

and consequently each



= ,

} be a reduced set of residues set of residues modulo m

is congruent modulo m to one and only one

.

Let ≡

,



,

−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−− .

…………

−−−−−−−−−

…………



, are precisely



.

so that, the product

.



.

………

.

= ��� ���d�c� ��

.

………… ……… � …………

placed in some order

� �

M���������� ��� ����� c�������c��.

………







.

.







.



.

………

…………

.

,





………

( = . …………� ) is relativity prime to m, therefore their product . ………… � is also relatively prime to m, so cancelling . ………… � from both sides of the congruence relation (2).

Since each

W



=



!+

’ T e e - If p is a positive prime, then = , then

Case 1: If

Case 2: Let

⇒ . . −

!=





�� � �������� �� �.

and so the statement



�� ����.

> , Let a be a positive integer such that

prime, therefore a and P are relatively prime

Since

,

modulo P



,

=

= , therefore the linear congruence

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

!+





.

+ . − , Since P is a , has a unique solution

E-mail: [email protected] Page 2

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem

⇒ ����� ������ � ������ ������� ��� �, ��c� ���� ��d

���� � ≠





��c���� � d��� ��� ������� ≡

These integers a and b are inverse modulo P of each others.

=

Suppose that

⇒ ������� ��d��� P �� � �� � ������. T��� ⇔

I��

=



=

����



I��

S��c�

And





��� �

|

��d



− |



+



[ P �� � �����] �� ��������

|

|





��d

− ,

+



=



�� ��������

�. �. ������� ��d��� P �� � �� � ������

B�c���� ������� ��d��� Such that

+

|

|



|

I��







I�

=

��d ���� ��

��

��d



=



c�� ��� �� −

���

, �� ��� ��� �� � = { , , … . . ,



��d

����� ������ � ������ ��. −

The P-3 elements in the set S from

��

− }





�����������.

pairs of distinct elements of S.

such that the product of each pair is congruent modulo P to 1. Multiplying the



congruencies,

⇒ . ,……………

. . …………







!≡

!+

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

− ≡











E-mail: [email protected] Page 3

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem ��

La a

− [

�� � d����� ��

!+ ≡



e’ Theorem-



!+ ,



Statement- If P is a positive prime integer< the no. , , , … … … ,

=

Proof- Let

Where �



=

+

]

!+

− , then the sum of the products of

− , yaken a at a time, is divisible by P. +



+

+�



replacing

by

+

=

+ ,

+�

+ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ −

………………

+. … … … … + �

+�



………………

……………



is the sum of the products of the numbers , , , … … … ,

From . . . . . . . . . .

+

+

=

+

+

+

+

+

=

+

+

+

[



+ =

+� + [



equating the coefficient of





,

+� .

+� .



+ +� −







+� .



+�

+ +�



+

+� − ] ] …………

on both sides of the identity 4.

+� ≡ � +�

+� .

……………

+. … … … … … + � − − +. … … … … + � −

,………….

− , taken r times.

+ ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ − . … … … … + ̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅ −

…………

Substituting for f(x) and f(x+1) from (2) in (3)

+

�� � �������� �� .



+�



≡ �

………

………

≡ �

−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−

A����

N��



| � . |



⇒ |� , S��c�

| � . |



. |� . −

⇒ |� , B�c����



��d

S�������� �� c�� ���� ���� I�

= , , ,…………,

+�



|� . −



.



=





�����

⇒ |� . −

��� ���������� P���� |� , |� , … … … … |� − .

− , �ℎ��

d���d�� � , �����,

� d����� ��� ��� �� ��� ���d�c�� �� ��� ��. , , , … … T���� � �� � �����.

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

����� − ,

E-mail: [email protected] Page 4

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem

Definition of Devisors- Let a, b be two integer and ≠ . It there exists an integer c such that

=

, then we say.

That a divides b or a is a divisor of b or a is a factor of b is a multiple of a. When a is a divisor of b, we write ˶ | ˷.

This is read as a is a divisor of b, then b is a multiple of a and its write as

For example1. 2|8 since 8=2.4 when 2. -4|16 since 3.

×

= −

∈ .

. −

Theorem of Division Algorithm-

Proof- Let the set = { − =

− .

Therefore at least If

− .| |

If i.e.

If i.e.

: ∈ }. ∈

<

∈ .

and thus s is not empty.

. .,

. . − .| | ∈ <

Now

.

< | |.

+ .

.| |



then

−| | − .| |

| |∈

< , then s contains at least one non negative integer.

If

=

≠ , then there exists unique integer q.r such that. =

Since

.

.

is 3 is not divisor of 4 because there exists no integer q such that

If a is any integer and

=

− .| |

i.e. , if

, then

−| |

−| | − . −| |

− . −| | ∈

> , then s contain at least one non-negative integer. − . −| |

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

.

−| |∈

E-mail: [email protected] Page 5

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem >

<

The set always contains non-negative integers. The principle well-ordering, the non-empty subset of consisting of non-negative integers has a least member. Let negative integer belonging to s.

=



∈ , be the smallest non-

Since r is non-negative.

,

−| |∈ ,

Show that

> ,

If

=



>



,

If

−| |=



∈ ,



−| |<

< , −| |

−| |

i.e.

<

| |,

<| | −





∈ .

.

− | | is non-negative integer belonging to s and − | | < .

R as he smallest non-negative integer ∈ . We have

<| |

Integers q and r such that

=

. .



=

+ <| |

Now to show that the integers q and r are unique. Let the another pair Such that Then

′ and ′.

=



+ ′

+





,





=

+

<| |

− = − ′ | − ′ |

Then Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17



E-mail: [email protected] Page 6

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem <| |



Now putting We get ′

=



=

− ′| |

− ′ is possible only if

r is a divisor of

=



in









=



+

=

=

by applying cancellation law.



Since ′

and

=

′<| |

and there

=

+

and

are

unique.

Positive primes in at least one no way: Uniqueness of prime factor: Now we prove that the factorisation is unique. It possible let a second factorisation of a as a product of positive prime be given by. ′

Then



………… ′





|



=

=



|(



′ ′

…………

…………

…………

…………

′ ′





Since



and



Then ′

We get

/

|

are both positive primes. ′



…………

.

Since the product of integers is commutative. Let

)|

…………



…………



= +

…………



=



=





=

…………

…………

…………

,

…………

And also the equality of a prime factor in each product to some factor in the other product. A unique factorisation of a except for the order of the prime factor. If

=

And every

……… =

=

…………

for some j and every

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

are two prime factorisations for a

=

=

for some i.

E-mail: [email protected] Page 7

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem

Proved

The fundamental theorem of Arithmetic or the unique factorisation theorem: >

Statement: Every positive integer positive primes.

can be expressed uniquely as a product of

Proof: Existence of prime factorisation: First we shall prove that a can be factored at least in one way as the product of positive primes, by induction on a. The least positive integers > If

is 2.

=

Since 2 itself prime. Now assume according to induction hypothesis that the theorem is true for all integers k. Such that

<

<

And let integer a. If a is prime. Then if a is not prime. So Where

=

<

<

<

and

<

According to induction hypothesis b and c can be expressed as products of positive primes. Let

=

Where Then

=



=

…………… and



and

=

……………

are positive prime.

…………

…………

is a product of positive prime.

Such that by mathematical induction every positive integers a greater than 1 can be expressed as a product of.

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

E-mail: [email protected] Page 8

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem

Great common divisor: Let a and b be two integers not both zero i.e. at least one of them is not equal to zero. Then the greatest common divisor (G.C.D.) of a and b is a positive integer d, such that, 1. d|a and d|b i.e. d is a common divisor of a & b and, 2. If, for an integer c, c|a and c|b, then c|d i.e. every common divisor of a and b is a divisor of d. If d is the G.C.D. of a and b, then symbolically we write, Thus

,

=

,

will be read as G.C.D. of a and b. The greatest common divisor is

sometimes also called the highest common factor (H.C.F.). Example: 1. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 are common divisors of 24 & 60. 2. Out of these each of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 is a divisor of 12.

Euclidean Algorithm: Euclidean algorithm enables us to find the actual value of the greatest common divisor d of two given integers a and b, also to find integers x and y. Such that

=

+

Let a, b be two integers such that at least one of a, b is non-zero.

= , then

If

Case 1:

If Case 2: If Since

,



= , then

and

= | |, | |

≠ ,

,

,

=| |

=| |

We can assume that both a and b are positive integers. Using division algorithm, finite chain of divisions. Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

E-mail: [email protected] Page 9

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem =

=

+ ,

+

=

,<

,

+

,<

,

,<

………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………… −



=



=

>

+

>

+

+

+

>

,

,

,< +

>

Some r must be zero.

+

This process must terminates in the







,<

………………

and only finitely many integers lie between 0 & b.





process.



= =

=





+

.

Where

step.

, is the last non-zero remainder in repeated division

Let know that

,

=

So that last non-zero remainder

=

,

=. … … … … … =



,

=

is the G.C.D. of the given integer a and b.

Q. Find (26,118) and express it in the from 26x+118y, where x and y Ans. Using the process of division algorithm.

=

. +

= So the last non-zero remainder

=

=

Put the value of 12 is eg (5)

=







…………………

. + …………………

=



∈ .

…………………

. +

. + ………………… =

From eq (1) & (2).

=

.

.

.

=

=

= .

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

,

.





………………

………………



………………

E-mail: [email protected] Page 10

Mathematics Number Theory’s Theorem

From eq (1)

Put his value of 14 in eq (7)

= [ And if

=

=

= [

+

,





.

. ]− ] ]−[



=

=− ,

=

Ans.

Theorem: Two integers a and b are relatively prime if and only if we can find integers x

+

and y such that

= .

,

Proof: Let a and b are two relatively prime, then Let



,

=

=

,



| , |

Since the G.C.D. is to be positive, Hence

,

=







d=1

|

= .

+

|



and so a & b are relatively prime.

Lokesh Kumar (Computer Science Part 1) Roll no. 17

E-mail: [email protected] Page 11

Theorem of math.pdf

ሻ − ૚ࡼሺ. Page 3 of 11. Theorem of math.pdf. Theorem of math.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying Theorem of math.pdf. Page 1 of 11.

198KB Sizes 0 Downloads 313 Views

Recommend Documents

proof of bayes theorem pdf
Loading… Page 1. Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. proof of bayes theorem pdf. proof of bayes theorem pdf. Open. Extract. Open with.

COMPLEXITY OF BEZOUT'S THEOREM VII
References. [BFM96] Bernard Beauzamy, Jean-Louis Frot, and Christian Millour, Massively parallel com- putations on many-variable polynomials, Ann. Math.

The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
Problem: Using the information above found in example 5, sketch a graph of ( ). g x . The solutions for example 5: SOLUTIONS: We use the modified diagram above. (a) To calculate. 0. 2. (0). ( ) g. f t dt. -. = ∫. , we note that A1 = A2 and that thi

COMPLEXITY OF BEZOUT'S THEOREM VII
For any integer k ≥ 1 be denote by Ik the identity square matrix of size k. Lemma 1. Let k ≥ 1 and U ∈ Uk be a unitary matrix. Then, there exists a smooth path Ut ⊆ Uk, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1, such that U0 = Ik, U1 = U and. Length(Ut) ≤ π. √ k, w

COMPLEXITY OF BEZOUT'S THEOREM VII
all systems f = (f1,...,fn) of homogeneous polynomials of respective degrees deg(fi) = di, 1 ≤ i ≤ n. .... The Theorem and corollaries above are a consequence of the two following tech- ...... Online First DOI 10.1007/s10208-005-0211-0. [BP06b].

COMPLEXITY OF BEZOUT'S THEOREM VI
gests using the condition number to define a Riemannian metric on the solution variety and to study the geodesics of this metric. Finding a geodesic is in itself ...

An extension of Carnot's theorem
Jan 28, 2005 - d2 a + zx y d2 b + xy z d2 c) ≥ 2dadbdc(x + y + z). (c) 2(dbdc + dcda + dadb) ≤ R( dbdc da. + dcda db. + dadb dc. ). B. C. A. O da db dc. Figure 6: With circumcenter. Proof. (a) Using Theorem 2 with I ≡ O(sin 2A,sin 2B,sin 2C) an

Comparison Theorem
part), l'Hôpital's rule, and some other tools and the geometric intuition can be illustrated .... Ui(t) := 1. √fi(t0). Ji(t). (3.9) for i = 1, 2. Therefore, by the Jacobi equations and the ... Then define a map ϕ from the set of vector fields alo

Maximum Power Transfer Theorem
from the power source to the load is when the resistance ... Function generator on the Velleman oscilloscope that is used in a ... Th . http://www.vellemanusa.com ...

Squeeze Theorem Exercises.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Squeeze ...

WEDDERBURN'S FACTORIZATION THEOREM ... - Semantic Scholar
May 25, 2001 - Nrd|N : N −→ Z(N) is well defined, where Z(N) = F .... Let D1 = C((x1)) and define σ1 : D1 → D1 by the rule σ1(x1) = −x1. Now ... dia Math. Sci.

WEDDERBURN'S FACTORIZATION THEOREM ... - Semantic Scholar
May 25, 2001 - V. P. Platonov who developed a so-called reduced K-theory to compute SK1(D) .... be observed that v is a tame valuation and D = C and F = C.

Hardy–Weinberg Theorem
allele frequencies, it is important to state that in any ... If there are data providing genotype frequencies at a single .... Weir BS (1996) Genetic Data Analysis II.

First Welfare Theorem
S7. D8. 2. 8. S8. D9. 1. 9. S9. D10 0. 10 S10. Plus: Each person endowed with $10. 4 Conditions for Pareto Efficiency. Condition 1: Efficient Allocation of.

a dichotomy theorem for graphs induced by commuting families of ...
Then gk ◦gs' ◦π(0nγ) = gt' ◦π(0nγ), and since 〈g0,g1,...〉 is prismatic, it follows that supp(t ) = supp(s )∐ {k}, thus k = ki, for some i ≤ n, and supp(t) = supp(s)∐ {ki}, ...

Proof of the Julia–Zee Theorem - Springer Link
1 Apr 2009 - the temporal index, µ = i, j, k denote the spatial indices, and J ... is the current density in which ρ = J0 expresses the electric charge density. As spatial vector fields, the electric field E = (Ei ) and magnetic field B = (Bi ) are

A trichotomy theorem in natural models of AD
The argument can be seen in a natural way as proving two dichotomy theorems, ..... holding not in the universe V of all sets but rather in particular inner models, such as L(R). ..... any tree T on R with no end nodes has an infinite branch.

2.4. Average Value of a Function (Mean Value Theorem) 2.4.1 ...
f(x)dx . 2.4.2. The Mean Value Theorem for Integrals. If f is con- tinuous on [a, b], then there exists a number c in [a, b] such that f(c) = fave = 1 b − a. ∫ b a f(x)dx ,.

CLAPEYRON'S THEOREM OF THREE MOMENTS NOTES-2.pdf ...
Page 1 of 10. THE THREE-MOMENT EQUATION. for. CONTINUOUS BEAM ANALYSIS. CE 130L. Uncertainty, Design, and Optimization. Department of Civil ...

A version of the closed graph theorem
[1] J. Munkres. Topology, John-Wiley, 2005. [2] W. Rudin. Principles of Mathematical Analysis, Mc Graw Hill, 2000. 1Electronic mail: [email protected]. 1.

A new proof of Belyi's Theorem
A new proof of Belyi's Theorem is given. While Belyi's two proofs use different methods to first reduce the branch locus from Q to Q and then from Q to {0, 1, ∞} ...

An extension of Günther's volume comparison theorem ...
Euclidean space (see [6]). It would be natural to try to extend that result ... be the norms of Jacobi fields along a given geodesic. Assume for simplicity that those.

A trichotomy theorem in natural models of AD - CiteSeerX
although our results apply to a slightly larger class of models. The special form .... Theorem 1.2; and Hugh Woodin, for developing the beautiful theory of AD+, for.