The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Ladder Operators Originally appeared at: http://behindtheguesses.blogspot.com/2009/03/quantum-harmonic-oscillator-ladder.html Eli Lansey — [email protected] March 30, 2009

The Setup As a first example, I’ll discuss a particular pet-peeve of mine, which is something covered in many introductory quantum mechanics classes: The algebraic solution to quantum (1D) simple harmonic oscillator.1 The one-dimensional, time-independent Schr¨ odinger equation is: HΨ = EΨ,

(1)

where H is the Hamiltonian of the system. Explicitly, this Hamiltonian is H=

p2 + V (x), 2m

(2)

where p is the particle’s momentum, m is it’s mass and V (x) is the potential the particle is placed into. The potential associated with a classical harmonic oscillator is 1 V (x) = kx2 2 mx2 = , 2ω 2

(3)

where ω 2 ≡ k/m. For the sake of convenience, so we don’t get bogged down with various factors,2 we’ll consider m = ω = ~ = 1. Then, if we substitute (3) back into (2) we write the Hamiltonian as: p2 + x2 H= . (4) 2 A bad way Now, at this point, many texts, (see [1] or [2] for example,) define, with no motivation other than future “convenience”, two operators √ a ≡ (x + ip)/ 2 (5a) √ a† ≡ (x − ip)/ 2, (5b) 1

I’ll be discussing this in the boring algebraic sense of symbols and whatnot, leaving off the geometric/visual interpretation of the algebra for another time. 2 Or maybe I’m just lazy

1

Figure 1: How Einstein developed his famous E = mc2 expression. and proceed to show how these can be used to simplify the Hamiltonian and easily solve the problem. While it is an elegant and quick solution, this presentation is completely useless. I find it highly unlikely that Dirac sat down to solve this problem and tried a whole series of random operators c ≡ (x2 + ip)/7 √ √ 2 f ≡ ( xe−x /8 + ip3 )/ π

d ≡ (xp − eip )/π √ g ≡ ( xp − ip/x)/3

and so on, along with their complex conjugates, until he lucked out with the solution in (5), see Fig. 1. A better way What is far more likely is the argument given by Griffiths in [3], which I’ll loosely follow. He presents a rationale and a method for approaching this problem. Namely, he suggests factoring the Hamiltonian (4) into terms linear in x and p. If we ignore the operator properties of x and p momentarily, and consider the classical quantities, we can factor the Hamiltonian (x + ip) (x − ip) (p + ix) (p − ix) √ √ √ = Hclassical = √ . 2 2 2 2 2

(6)

Now we see a reason why (5) makes sense to try. Each term, either on the right or left side of (6),3 contains two terms which are complex conjugates of each other. If this were a classical problem, we could, in principle, make a change of variables converting the Hamiltonian to something of the form H = η 2 /2 = η ∗ η/2, (7) where η is any of the combinations of x and p in (6). Although this is not a “canonical transformation,” the symmetric form4 of the Hamiltonian allows us to reduce the Hamiltonian from a function of two dynamical variables to a function of a single dynamical variable. Switching back to quantum mechanics, we now see a rationale for choosing a and a† as we did.5 Although deciding which variable to attach the i to and its choice of sign is a guess,6 we now have a general method for approaching Hamiltonians that look like they might be easily factored classically – try using the classical factorizations with quantum quantities and see what happens. References [1] J.J. Sakurai. Modern Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, CA, revised edition, 1993. [2] F. Schwabl. Quantum Mechanics. Springer, 3rd edition, 2005. [3] D.J. Griffiths. Introduction to Electrodynamics. Pearson Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 1999. [4] P.A.M. Dirac. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Oxford University Press, USA.

3

And, since this is a classical problem, the order does not matter, either. Yes, it’s only up to a constant which I’ve set to one, but you can still symmetrize things by changing to unitless variables, see [2]. 5 Recall that the † for a quantum-mechanical operator/matrix serves the role of the ∗ in (7). 6 It actually does not matter to the solution of the problem. The only change is which operator acts to ‘step up’ the state. Dirac actually defined his operators with the i attached to the x variable, see [4]. 4

3

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Ladder Operators - Eli Lansey

Mar 30, 2009 - As a first example, I'll discuss a particular pet-peeve of mine, which is something covered in many introductory quantum mechanics classes: The algebraic solution to quantum (1D) simple harmonic oscillator.1 The one-dimensional, time-independent Schrödinger equation is: HΨ = EΨ,. (1) where H is the ...

172KB Sizes 0 Downloads 160 Views

Recommend Documents

Behind the Guesses - Eli Lansey
Mar 23, 2009 - So I'm starting this blog to attempt to show some of the reasoning that ... that science should be taught according to the historical development.

The Schrödinger Equation - Eli Lansey
May 26, 2009 - http://behindtheguesses.blogspot.com/2009/05/schrodinger-equation.html ... where G is the generator of this particular transformation.2 See [2] ...

The Schrödinger Equation - Eli Lansey
May 26, 2009 - In quantum mechanics this equation is replaced with df dt. = ih[f,H]. (8) where the square brackets signify a commutation relation and H is the ...

Derivative and Integral of the Heaviside Step Function - Eli Lansey
http://behindtheguesses.blogspot.com/2009/06/derivative-and-integral-of-heaviside.html. Eli Lansey — [email protected]. June 30, 2009. The Setup. 4. 2. 2. 4.

Quaternions – Part 1: How many? - Eli Lansey
Nov 30, 2009 - the mysterious algebraic problem of “closure” or something to that effect. Then, often retelling the story of Hamilton and a bridge1 they pull some strange, “4D” quater- nions out of a hat and show how they happily resolve all

man-40\harmonic-oscillator-kinematics.pdf
Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. man-40\harmonic-oscillator-kinematics.pdf. man-40\harmonic-oscillator-kinematics.pdf.

Quaternions – Part 1: How many? - Eli Lansey
Nov 30, 2009 - Graphically this is a vector with length ab at an angle θ = (β −α) from the x-axis. Expanding this into a real and complex part using Euler's identity (1) gives: A∗B = abcosθ + i absinθ. (3). We now note that the real part of

A generalized quantum nonlinear oscillator
electrons in pure crystals and also for the virtual-crystal approximation in the treatment of .... solvable non-Hermitian potentials within the framework of PDMSE.

Linear Operators for Quantum Mechanics - Thomas F. Jordan.pdf ...
Retrying... Linear Operators for Quantum Mechanics - Thomas F. Jordan.pdf. Linear Operators for Quantum Mechanics - Thomas F. Jordan.pdf. Open. Extract.

TERMINATION [IEVIEE ELI/3'2
Jul 29, 1996 - 5,272,396 12/1993 Mammano et a1. .................... .. 326/30 mg reslstors' Acnvanon of the termmanon modes 15 log' cally driven from an ...

Phase-shifting oscillator
Flg. 2. The complete circuit for an audio oscillator. wpELESS WORLD FEBRUARY 19E. When we apply to the n.t.c. a sine wav voltage with an r. m.s. value, v,: v, ...

Bitwise Operators
to the Cloud! • This is better than WinSCP and a text ... Valgrind. • Pronunciation: val-grinned. • For best results: ... Bitwise Encryption. One-time pad: My string:.

Yig-tuned solid state microwave oscillator
Mar 29, 1971 - device 11, which may be a GaAs bulk effect device or an Im patt diode ... of a dc. blocking capacitor 19, the other side of the capacitor. 19 being ...

harmonic function.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. harmonic ...

Bitwise Operators
This is better than WinSCP and a text editor. You don't want to do that. ... valgrind –v –leak-check=full . • Gives a report on ... subtree of each node contains only lesser nodes. 2) Right subtree of each node contains only greater nodes. 3) L

I Eli tN
The Manila Teachers' Savings and Loan Association Inc. (MTSLAI). 918 United Nations Avenue, Ermita, Manila. Telephone Nos.: (02) 404-2790; (02) 404-2795; ...

Ladder epochs and law of the maximum of ladder ...
Summary. Let (Sn)n≥0 be a random walk on R; under quite large assumptions on its law µ we describe its oscillations and study several ways to condition it to stay nonnegative. Namely, we can first consider the condition that Sk ≥ 0 up to time n

Delay stage circuitry for a ring oscillator
of Search . ..... phase deadband characteristics to be easily optimized. Another object of the present .... (ASIC), a memory controller, or a graphics engine. Master.

Yig-tuned solid state microwave oscillator
Mar 29, 1971 - coupled to one end of a quarter wavelength transmission line. 15 on-the surface of quartz substrate 28 mounted on the base. 23. The other end of the transmission line 15 is electrically connected to an r.f. bypass capacitor 16 which is

Using the LTC6900 Low Power SOT-23 Oscillator ... - Linear Technology
The LTC6900 master oscillator is controlled by the ratio of the voltage between V+ and the SET pin and the current,. IRES, entering the SET pin. As long as IRES ...

Oscillator Model Theory
over the canonical distribution of r, pr, and pθ and substituting into eq 1, we can obtain the low-density transport ... Boltzmann factor. Equation 6 is valid when the ...