City of Salem Salem Parks Improvement Fund FY 2012-2014 The SPIF program was first established in 2006 and is intended to provide an opportunity for Salem’s Neighborhood Associations (NA) to partner with the City to help make local park improvements. Recognized Neighborhood Associations only are encouraged to apply. Each NA is limited to one project per grant cycle. City Council approved $60,000 in SPIF matching funds for the 2012/13 fiscal year. All projects must be approved by city staff and fall within the requirements of the current City of Salem Comprehensive Park System Master Plan (Master Plan). The minimum project amount for this program is $2,500. I. HOW THE PARTNERSHIP WORKS – GENERAL OVERVIEW The NA identifies a project within one of their parks. The City works closely with the NA to ensure the project is feasible and within the standards of the Master Plan. Once a project has been selected and approved by the SPIF Project Review Committee, the City will award a portion of the funds needed to construct the project, and the NA raises the rest of the money. The NA has approximately one year to raise their matching funds. The City then oversees the construction and works with NA volunteers who wish to participate in the process. The partnership is not just the sharing of the cost; it also involves City staff working together with the Neighborhood in the planning, construction, and eventual celebration of their park project. II. HOW TO APPLY – THE DETAILS The application portion of the program is a two-part process: Part One is the submission of a Letter of Intent. Part Two is the submission of a formal application. Part One – Letter of Intent – Due September 14, 2012 (see Timeline) The Letter of Intent (LOI) is a brief explanation of the project, approved by the Neighborhood Association, and signed by its Chair. All LOI forms must be submitted by September 14, 2012 to be eligible for this cycle of the program. You can find the LOI form included with this packet. All LOIs are received by the City, then reviewed by the SPIF Review Committee. This Committee consists of three Parks and Recreation Advisory Board members, one Salem Parks Foundation member, and City staff. The initial focus of the Committee is feasibility, which means whether the project is consistent with the overall use of the park. If a project does not meet this requirement, the NA will be given opportunity to adjust the scope of their project. Those NAs approved will then be contacted for a pre-application meeting with staff to discuss the project in more detail before submitting a formal application. Part Two – Formal Application – November 30, 2012 (see Timeline) A. Pre-Application Meeting and Eligible Project Criteria Once the LOI is approved, the NA will be contacted by City staff for a pre-application conference. The formal application form will be provided at this time. At this meeting, the NA representative will sit down with the Park Superintendent and the SPIF Project

Coordinator to discuss their proposed project in more detail. This meeting may take place on site or in the Parks Operations’ office. Eligible project criteria will include the following items. 1. The project is identified as a sited amenity on the Master Plan. The Parks Master Plan is designed to meet the needs of neighborhood, community, and large urban parks. Park amenities are planned for different categories of parks based on a wide variety and number of users depending on the size of the park. There may be a certain park amenity that is in a community park, but not at a neighborhood park simply because of the park size, service area, and/or location. 2. Project meets all local, state, and federal laws for parks and recreation facilities. Any new amenity added to a public park must meet local, state and federal rules to ensure all citizens safe access and use. A new improvement may require infrastructure such as an access point for a wheel chair, or walkways to provide a safe route leading to the proposed project. 3. The project qualifies as a City of Salem, Parks Operations standard park amenity. The City of Salem has a set standard of park amenities purchased from city-approved manufacturers in order to meet specific safety and maintenance requirements. Even an item as simple as a bench has to be made from a specific quality of material in order to sustain damage due to use, weather, and vandalism. B. Project Budget After the pre-application review, city staff will work up a budget estimate for submission with the formal application. At that time, the Neighborhood will know the approximate cost of the project and have an idea of how much money they will need to raise. It is important to note that project cost estimates are just that – estimates. Actual project costs can vary due to the economic and bidding environment at that time. If the proposed improvement can utilize volunteer labor, that will be discussed at this time as well. This will allow the representative to take this information to their Neighborhood Association meeting for approval prior to application submission. C. Application Review Criteria Applications will include a brief description of the project and the cost sheet provided by the City of Salem. The application MUST be signed by the Neighborhood Association Chairperson and the NA’s designated Park Chair. When the applications have been submitted, staff will review the proposals and verify that all of the information is complete. The applications will then be scored by the Review Committee. The Review Committee will score each application based on the following project criteria. Each item will have a possible total value of 20 points. 1. Feasibility A project’s feasibility is based on the likelihood the NA can raise their portion of the funding within the designated time frame. 2. Matching Funds Applicants must either have solid funding in place or lay out a firm plan to garner their funds that is relatively feasible. Confirmation of a donation can be established through the actual receipt of a contribution, or a pledge letter that details the amount or level of support and a contribution date.

Preference points will be awarded to those projects that have a high percentage of their funds already in place. Volunteer hours can be used toward a portion of the NA match; however, volunteer labor must be discussed prior to application, and will be determined and approved by the City on a case-by-case basis. 3. Community Support Applicants need to show support from their neighborhood residents, businesses, school(s), civic groups, etc. Submission of letters of support from neighborhood residents, organizations, and businesses is encouraged. Contact your Neighborhood Services Counselor at 503-588-6261 for ideas on how to generate support. 4. Priority of Need Applicant must show an identifiable need for the desired park improvement and the level of priority. 5. Maintenance Level The proposal should show the extent to which the improvement will (1) reduce maintenance costs, or (2) require minimal, ongoing maintenance costs. Preference points will be given to those Neighborhood Associations who agree to assist with ongoing maintenance and enter into an agreement to that effect for a period of time agreed to by both the Neighborhood Association and the City. III. FUNDING PROCESS The SPIF grant program is a 50 / 50 matching grant with a maximum grant award of $20,000. This means that the neighborhood association must provide a minimum of 50% of the funds and/or volunteer labor towards the project. For example, if a project is estimated at $40,000, and the SPIF Committee awards $20,000 toward the project, the neighborhood association is responsible for raising the other $20,000. If a project is $25,000 in total cost, and the SPIF Committee awards $12,500, the neighborhood association will be required to raise the other $12,500 toward the project. While there is no maximum project amount defined in the SPIF program, if a project exceeds $40,000, the neighborhood association is required to raise any amount over the $20,000 maximum award from the SPIF grant. For example, if a project is $50,000, and the SPIF Committee awards $20,000, the neighborhood association will need to raise $30,000 for the project. The value of volunteer labor can only be applied to identified and approved volunteer work on the project. It cannot go toward hard costs, such as the purchase of equipment or materials. Although the maximum funding amount for each SPIF project is $20,000, the SPIF Review Committee has discretion to award a larger or smaller amount depending on the number of applications received and how well the Neighborhood Association has satisfied the project criteria. This is determined by the cumulative application score. If the award is smaller, the NA will need to raise the difference between the award and the project amount. The award will be held by the City until such time as the NA has completed their fundraising and construction of the project can begin. All NA donations received will be managed by the Salem Parks Foundation, a non-profit 501(c)(3) corporation. A separate meeting will need to be set up between the NA representative and the Parks Foundation members once the SPIF project has been approved, to explain the process for making donations and submitting funds toward the project.

Fundraising Deadlines Because this program runs over the course of two fiscal years, each NA has the opportunity of having its project constructed during the first year or second year, depending on when the NA is able to raise the matching funds. 1. April 1, 2013 Early Fundraising Deadline. Funds raised by this date will assure the project will be completed in the summer construction season of 2013. 2. December 31, 2013 Final Fundraising Deadline. Project will be completed by the end of the summer 2014 construction season. If all funds are not raised by this date, the project is cancelled and any funds that have been raised by the neighborhood association may be used as follows: a. Agree to a reduced scope for the project in order to fit within the funds raised and the adjusted City matching funds (the SPIF award amount is adjusted down to the level of funds raised by the neighborhood and not kept at the original award, maintaining the 50-50 match requirement). b. Be used for other suitable and approved park improvements in the same park based on the funds raised. c. The NA allows the funds raised to remain in the Salem Parks Foundation account and be used for a city park project at the discretion of the Salem Parks Foundation and the City. d. Return the funds to the donors. The SPIF Review Committee may consider reapplication by the Neighborhood Association in the next approved cycle. Reconsideration will be based on the overall efforts of the NA during the current grant cycle. IV. COMMUNICATION During the planning and construction phases of the SPIF project, we ask that each Neighborhood Association appoint one or two representatives to work with the SPIF Program Coordinator who will coordinate City assistance for each Neighborhood Association by working with the Parks Superintendent, Park Supervisors, Volunteer Coordinator, and the Neighborhood Counselor to answer any questions the NA representative may have during this process. This will simplify communications and ensure that each party involved receives the same information on the project. The SPIF representative can be the Chair, Park Chair, or other person appointed by the NA’s Board.

2012-2014 SALEM PARKS IMPROVEMENT FUND LETTER OF INTENT ALL AREAS MUST BE FILLED OUT AND SIGNED BEFORE SUBMISSION. Please submit to Toni Whitler, SPIF Program Coordinator Parks Operations, 1460 20th Street SE, Salem OR 97302 Neighborhood Association:

Chairperson’s Name:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

SPIF Representative’s Name:

Address:

Phone:

Email:

Proposed Park Site: Type of Project: (check more than one box if appropriate) 

New Park Feature (s)  Replacement of Existing Park Feature (s)  Park Rehabilitation

Project Description: (Description of the proposed work elements)

Signatures Required

Neighborhood Association Chair

Date

SPIF 12-14 FINAL GUIDELINES.pdf

The project is identified as a sited amenity on the Master Plan. The Parks Master Plan is designed to meet the needs of neighborhood, community,. and large urban parks. Park amenities are planned for different categories of parks. based on a wide variety and number of users depending on the size of the park. There.

38KB Sizes 1 Downloads 222 Views

Recommend Documents

COMPETITIONS_HANDBOOK_2016 FINAL FINAL FINAL.pdf ...
Ashurst Student Paper 18. Herbert Smith Freehills Negotiation 20. Jackson McDonald First Year Mooting 22. Australia Red Cross International Humanitarian ...

Hora Santa final- final .pdf
Page 1 of 4. Pastoral Vocacional - Provincia Mercedaria de Chile. Hora Santa Vocacional. Los mercedarios nos. consagramos a Dios,. fuente de toda Santidad.

FINAL Kanata North Final Boundary memo Sep2017.pdf
Loading… Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... FINAL Kanata ... Sep2017.pdf. FINAL Kanata ... o Sep2017.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign I

Final - Final Calendar 2017-18.pdf
Page 2 of 16. Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat. 1. Modified Fall Sports Begin. 2. 3 4. LABOR DAY! 5. Supt. Conference Day. 6. CLASSES BEGIN! 7. SPTO Mtg 3:30 p.m.—H. BOE Workshop 6:30pm—H. 8 9. ACT. 10 11. CROP Begins; Early Morn. Program Begins. 12 6

Final final GWLA report-9-3-2013.pdf
Page 1 of 27. The GWLA Student Learning Outcomes Taskforce Report 1. GWLA Student Learning Outcomes Task Force. Report on Institutional Research Project. September 3, 2013. Background Information: The GWLA Student Learning Outcomes Taskforce. In 2011

GP EUSKADI - 3rd Final - Final ranking-2.pdf
1 Red Bull KTM Factory Racing BLAZUSIAK Taddy POL PZM KTM 17.551 24.493 42.044 9 00:06:52.169 -. 2 Rockstar Energy Husqvarna Factory Racing BOLT ...

2016 Final Odyssey FINAL 2.pdf
were opened for me just by putting myself out there. Now moving on to Parsons School of. Design in New York City, the fear I once had revolving my art has ...

JCES Student Handbook Final Copy 2016-2017 Final Copy.pdf
School Food Services 35. School Insurance for Students 35. State and Standardized Testing 35. Student Acceptable Use Regulations (Internet) 36. Student ...

Final Amherst Private School Survey (final).pdf
Choice, Charter, and Private School Family Survey. Page 4 of 33. Final Amherst ... ey (final).pdf. Final Amherst ... ey (final).pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Final Exam Solution - nanoHUB
obtain an expression for the conductance per unit width at T=0K, as a function of the ... Starting from the law of equilibrium, what is the average number of electrons ... is identical to contact 1, except that it is magnetized along +x instead of +z

Final Programs.pdf
Track / Room Room 1: “Anchan” Room 2: “Orchid” Room 3: “Tabak”. 13.00-13.20. Paper ID.5. Verification of data measured on an. internal combustion engine.

pdf sponsor final - GitHub
the conference is supported, allowing attendees fees ... conference organisation and other related costs. ... Call for Participation (CFP) Deadline: 3 Sept 2017.

IEAS final
Here is a familiar example to illustrate the notion of a self-conscious state of mind. As John rounds the aisles of the supermarket he spies a trail of spilled sugar, ...

CHN Anaphylaxis Final 8.26.13_Somali.doc
Page 1. 口口. 口. 口口口口口. 口口. 口口. 口. 口口口口. Page 2. TM. TM. An affiliate of Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota www.clinics4kids.org.

Conference Final Program
2007 International Conference on Parallel Processing. □ September 10-14, 2007 □ Tangchen Hotel Xi'an. □ XiAn, China. CONFERENCE AT A GLANCE.

Final Programe.pdf
University of Patras, Department of Primary Education. John Katsillis ... Georgia Dede Chariklia Prantzalou. Petros Drosos ... Page 3 of 32. Final Programe.pdf.

Final list- 59 - gsssb
Mar 3, 2016 - AND QUALIFIED FOR THE COMPUTER PROFICIENCY TEST. FOR THE POST OF LABORATORY TECHNICIAN (ADVT. NO 59/201516).

Final report
attributes instead of the arbitrarily chosen two. The new mapping scheme improves pruning efficiency of the geometric arrangement. Finally, we conduct experiments to analyze the existing work and evaluate our proposed techniques. Subject Descriptors:

FHRAI 2014-Final - HVS
Website: www.fhrai.com. Price: FHRAI Members: `500 (per additional copy) .... L&D programme envisions best in class trainings in the traditional verticals of Finance, .... EXHIBIT 1: Occupancy and Average Rate (2009-10 to 2013-14) ..... the Formula 1

Final Draft.pdf
data from The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System on enrollment rates over the. admission years spanning 2002-2014. .... students are making that decision (Dejong and Ingram 2001; Becker 1964). The loss of job. experience from not finding

Final Book.pdf
MONEY IN A DAY. Page 1 of 30 ... As time proceeds, those who have a solid understanding of stock market trends,. and financial ... Final Book.pdf. Final Book.