Scholastic Dishonesty Sanctioning Guidelines When instructors determine that scholastic dishonesty has more than likely occurred, it is their responsibility to determine an appropriate sanction given the nature of their course. The purpose of administering a sanction is to hold students accountable for their actions and to facilitate learning. Consider the following questions when determining an appropriate sanction.
1. Was the student aware of the expectations of the course/assignment with regard to scholastic dishonesty? 2. Was the student aware of the fact they were plagiarizing or cheating? 3. Does the student understand the greater impacts of scholastic dishonesty (e.g., fairness to other students, the integrity of a degree from the University of Minnesota)? Below you will find examples of scholastic dishonesty followed by common sanctions. Please keep in mind that the factors surrounding each student and each case and the context of the course may be different and may yield different results (these are nonbinding recommendations). No academic Penalty /Warning
Partial Credit or additional assignment
No credit on assignment, quiz or exam
Reduced final course grade
F in the course
Minor plagiarism on an ungraded draft Minor plagiarism or improper citation Unauthorized resources or collaboration on homework Significant plagiarism (failure to cite and/or paraphrase) Submitting work partially or entirely done by another student* Cheating on an exam Falsifying information or data Blatant cheating (e.g. hiring someone to complete coursework) Repeated incidents of scholastic dishonesty in the same class *if a student outside your course is involved, please refer to Section 2.2 of the “Student Academic Integrity Misconduct Procedures - Morris Campus” Any Academic Integrity incidents should be reported to the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Student Affairs within two weeks. This ensures that the student(s) and faculty receive timely and accurate information on their rights and responsibilities. Thanks to UMTC Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity (OSCAI) for sharing their Sanctioning Guidelines Grid.
Was the student aware of the fact they were plagiarizing or cheating? 3. Does the student understand the greater impacts of scholastic dishonesty (e.g., fairness to other students, the integrity of a degree from the University of Minnesota)?. Below you will find examples of scholastic dishonesty followed by common sanctions.
plified considerably when such reputation information is shared among a ..... information prohibits the use of this kind of mechanisms in a large scale online market. .... require CPU time, storage requests need disk space, information requests .....
The availability of ubiquitous communication through the Internet is driving the migra- tion of business transactions from direct contact between people to ... can be eliminated by a reputation mechanism that punishes providers for not exerting effor
Total Marks / CGPA secured in all subjects. Maximum Marks / CGPA for all subjects. Total Marks / CGPA secured in all subjects. Maximum Marks / CGPA for all.
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. Alpha Scholastic ...
Fax: +3316079117. 11/07/11. Acknowledgments ... Dykema-Engblade (2009) report thatâin a simulated computer-mediated .... All recipients were required to send a particular suggestion concerning how to split the â¬10, but they had the ...
In the medical profession- which deals with human touch- these aspects of learning become ... IT skills: Computer, internet. 4. ... Balance of home and career.
Apr 28, 2014 - Financial support by the Faculty of Business and Economics at the University .... The solution concept is perfect Bayesian equilibrium (PBE), and we focus on PBE .... probability one for all states Ï â¥ Ï/ as her costs d = 1 â Ï/
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. SCHOLASTIC ...
Dec 18, 2007 - Recommendation Statement. If the service is offered, patients should understand the uncertainty about the balance of benefits and harms. * USPSTF. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Table 2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Levels
Jul 17, 2007 - What the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Grades Mean and Suggestions for Practice* ... is moderate or high certainty that the service has.
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. ANCHORAGE ...