Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics (2005) 29: 773-783

Southeast Asian Bulletin of Mathematics @ ) S E A M S .2 0 0 5

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness V Ravichandran School of Mathematical Sciences,Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800 USM Penang, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected]

S SivaprasadKumar Department of Applied Mathematics, Delhi College of Engineering, Delhi - 110 042, India E-mail: [email protected]

AMS Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 30C45 Abstract. In this paper, we give some sufficient conditions for analytic functions defined on lzl ( 1 to have positive ieal part and in general to satisfy the subordination p\z) < q(z). Also some applications of these results are discussed. Keywords: Starlikeness; Caratheodory function; Differential subordination.

1. Introduction Let Ao be the classof all functions f (r) : zIa2z2 iasz3 *. . w.hichare analytic i n A : { r;l rl < 1 } L e t Ab e the cl assof al l functi onsp(z) : l -tptzl p2z2 + ' ' ' which are analytic in A. The class P of Caratheodory functions consists of functions p(z) € .4 having positive real part. Recently Nunokawa et. aI. 12] gave some sufficient conditions for analytic functions in A to have positive real part. In this paper, we generalized the results by finding some conditions on a,g,1,d and w(z) such that each of the foilowing differential subordination implies p(z) e P: 6 zp' (z) < w (z), o a p (z ) + 7 p Q)' + i4 i . a p (z )2 * 6 z p (z )p ' (r) < u (" ),,, .

o ap(z)+ 0pQ)2+ i4 + 6i& < w(z), . ap(z)+ gpQ)'+ ia + 6#E < w(z).

) P c a n b e w r i t t e na s p ( z ) < ( 1 + " ) l Q - z ) . I n N o t e t h a t t h e c o n c i u s i o n p ( z€ this paper, we find sufficient conditions for the subordination p(z) < q(z) to hold. ReceivedMarch \7,2003, Accepted November 4,2004.

774

V Ravichandran and S S. Kumar

Our results include the results obtained by Nunokawa et. a1.[2]. We also give some application of our results to obtain sufficient conditions for starlikeness. We need the following result of Milier and Mocanu[1] to prove our main result: Theorem A. Let q(z) be uniualent i,n the uni,t di,skA and 0 and Q be analyti,c 'in a doma'in D conta'in'ingq(A) wi,th Q(tu) + 0 when w e q(A). Set QQ) : z q'(z )6 @ Q )), h (z ) : 0 (q (z )) + QQ). S upposethat (1) QQ) r,sstarl'ikeuniualent'in L, and - L l

t - t

( 2 )R e f f i > 0 f o r z € 4 . If q(r) i,s a analyt'ic 'in A wi,th p(0) : q(0), p(D) € D and O(p(z)) + z p ' ( z ) S @ Q ) ) < 0 ( q ( r ) ) * z q ' ( r ) 6 @ Q ) ) , t h e n p ( z ) < q ( z ) a n d q ( z ) i , st h e b e s t domi,nant.

2. Caratheodory

F\rnctions

We begin with the following: Theorem 2.T. Let a, {3,1 and 6 be compler numbers,5 + 0. Let 0 I qQ) € A be uniualent in L and sattsfy the following condi,tionsfor z € A: (l) ,q'(z) i,sstarl'ike,

^ /r-p'q,,r:r)}to. e ) n * {( *o + 1o Q l z )- & d P + ( , qrzt /)

Ifp(t)€Asatisfies a p (z ) + g p (z )2 + *

p \ z)

+ 6 zp'(z) < aq(z) + 0q(42 + l = + 6zq'(z), q \ z)

then p(z) < q(z) and q(z) i,s the best domi,nant. P r o o f .L e t 0 ( w ) : ( t L L ) l B u 2 * f i a n d d ( d : d . The"d(w)f 0attd0(.),d(.) are analytic in A - {0}. Let the function QQ) and h(z) be defined by Q Q ) : z q '( z ) d @ Q ) ) : 6 z q '( z ) ,

h(z): 0(q(r))+ QQ) : aq(z)+ CqQ)'+ + * 6zq'(z). q \ z) Clearly QQ) is starlike and (^ nq n ez h^' ()z :\ R e l + * ' ! / \

elz)

ld

1 1

' (/ -t * az q! "J( z\) )\ ' ,l t o .

o - Q \ z ) - 6 q ( + + 1 t -d @ ) l

The differential subordination

a p ( z ) +\ p Q ) ' + + - r d z p ' ( z<) a q ( z ) + 0 q ( z )+2 + * 6 z q ' ( z ) p \ z) q \ z)

775

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness becomes

0 ( p ( r ) )- t z p ' ( z ) Q @ Q )<) e @ Q ) )* z q ' ( z ) Q @ Q ) ) . The result followsby an applicationof TheoremA. By taking o, 0,1 and d to be real, we have the following result: Corollary 2.2. Let a,1 and 6 be posi,t'iuenumbers. If 0 I pQ) € A and

o p, \ z\ , ) ,+, c, p, 2l z, ) ,' L* o , *rdrr,r , ( r )< " ( - ) * B \t_z/

rr'

(:*

\1=i

z\

lt-

262

* t ( 1 + r ) + O, _ ; p '

th e n R e p (z ) > 0 . Proof. This result follows from Theorem 2.1 by taking q(z) : function QQ) :2521(l - ,)' is clearly starlike. Since z Q ' Q ) a , 2 C ( 1 + :t+t\.r-, q\z)- 1 6 q a y *a @

0 , 2 0 , \

t+ a

z \

-

1 ( 1 - r \ '

)-t\t.r/

Then the

I - r z

+ t-z

we have, with z -- eio (

* . t nf + 27{ 3c ,() - 6 lr_ G+pr *Q 'i( rd) \ j :=i c } * uL t a n0 ' r > o . Let 1 : 0 and q(z) be the function defined by

q, (\z ) :l *f Af iz'

- 1< B < A < r '

Then we have (A-B)'

z qt , \ 'z ) : e+Bzy L e t g (z ) - z q '(z ). T h e n z g ' ( z )_ l - B z g(z) I-t Bz' If z -- reie , we have | - B2r2

R"""t 9 ' Q ) g(z)

> u'

1 + B 2 r 2+ 2 B r c o s 0

Hence zq'(z) is starlike in A. Also it follows that

0 20 t+

(, * a!!4\ :

dq(r)+\

- (1- c-l6)8lz [1+ (o + 2P)l6] + l2pA16

q , ( z))

u uz : - + l+Bz'

I t Bz

776

V Ravichandran and S S. Kumar

w h e r eu : I * ( a + Z p ) 1 5a n du : 2 P A l 6 - ( I - a l 5 ) 8 . T h ef u n c t i o w n ( z ): # f f i maps A into the disk n-Bul ,lr-B"l I

l w -t - B , l < t - n ,

Therefore

R e ( -u B u )- l u- B u lr ' """{[+d + ' 2 ! u a + ( t + ' q " ( ' ) )} : o o q ' ( z )) J u t-82 ,. provided Re(z-Bo)>lu-Bul Re(z-Br)>lu-Bal. Hencewe havethe followingresult: C o r o l l a r y2 . 3 .L e t - 1 < B < A < I . L e t a , p a n d d s a t i , s fRye ( u - B r ) > l u - B t l w h e r eu : I + ( r + 2 P ) 1 6a n du : 2 P A l 5 - ( 1 - a l 6 ) 8 . I f p ( r ) € A a n d

a p ( z c) +p Q )*'l'z p ' ( z ) . , * ( + + ) * p" \(r!+! *B)z' *) \t+Br)

B|'=.

' "d( :1!--t B z 1 z '

thenp(z) . ## B y ta k i n g o : 0 , A : I,B : -1 and B and d to be real , then w e have the following result of Nunokawa et. al.l2): Corollary 2.4. Let | + 2P16 > 0. If p(z) e A and

(,)< u (-)' ope)'t dzp'

*

;%,

t he n R e p (z ) > 0 . If q(z) is a convex function that maps A onto a region in the right half plane, then the conditions of Theorem 2.1 are satisfied bV qQ) whenever ad > 0. 05 > 0, and 7:0. By taking q(z):(-)^

o<^<1

we have the following: Corollary 2.5. Let a6, p5 > 0. If p(z) e A and

r y p (+z ) t p l z )+2 6 , p ' ( z )< o ( = ) ^ \r-z/

* 0 (-)'^ \1=)

-* r?r 4- ; \ t/ t- r+/ ' \ ^

777

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness

thenlArgp(r)l < ),r 12. T h e o r e m2 . 6 . L e t a a n d S b e c o m p l e r n u m b e r s , 6f 0 . L e t q ( z ) e A b e u n ' i u a l e n t i,n A and satisfy the following conditions for z € A: (1 ) L e t Q Q) : 6 z q (z )q ' (z ) b e starl i ,ke,

( 2 ) n " { ? * z Q ' Q ) I Q Q )>} 0 . Ifp(r)€Asatisfies a p (z )2 + 6 zp(z)p' (r) < aq(z)2 -r 6zq(z)c1' Q), th,enp(z) < q(z) and q(z) is the best domi,nant. The proof of this theorem is similar to that of Theorem 2.1 and therefore omitted. Let c1Q)be the function

- 1< B < A < t '

q(z):(+#)t Then we have

o<)<1'

zq(z)q'(l:ftffi

Lei QQ) -- zq(z)q'(z). Then ,Q'Q) _ | - Bz 1* Bz' QQ) If z :

T e i o ,w e h a v e I - B2r2

zQ'G)

o-tffi:

ggzrz*2gr*u2u'

Hencezq(z)q'(z) is starlikein A. Thus,we have 2a

zQ'Q)

d'- ae)

- QalS+1) +(2cl-15-r)Bz r+Bz _ u+uz 1+ Bz'

w h e re u : (2 a fd + f) a n d u : A into the disk

I

(2a16 - l )8.

The funcLi onw (z) :

a-Bul ,lr-BEl

l w -r - B , l < t - e r Therefore

R" " I[4 d +'Q',?)l : QQ))

Re(z,' r - 8 2 - Btl t s ?o)=-lu

##

maps

((6

V Ravichandran

and S S. Kumar

provided that

Re(z-Br)>lu-Bul OT

Re(u-Br)>lu-Bu,l. Therefore we have the following result: y e(t,-Bu)> lu-Bal C o r o l l a r y 2 . 7 .L e t - 1 < B < A < 1 . L e t a , p a n d d s a t i , s fR w h e r e r l : ( 2 a f d + t ) a n d u : ( 2 a 1 6- l ) 8 . I f p ( r ) e A a n d

a p ( z ) 2 + 6 z
,

,

t h e rpL( . i . ( j + # ) ' By ta k i n g A:I,B :

-1 a n d a,13,6to be real , w e have the fol l ow i ngresul t:

Corollary 2.8. If p(r) e A and

o p ( z ) 2 5- tz p ( z ) p '.(, r )' | j +

i!+,

t h e np ( t - ( l = )-j / \Theorem 2.9. Let a, 0,1 and 6 be cornplernu,mbers,6 + 0. Let 0 I r1Q) € A be un'iualent in L and satisfy the follouting c:onditionsfor z e A; ( 1 ) L e t Q Q) - 6 tq ' Q)l q Q ) b e start' i ke,

(2)Reiga(z) +'#q'Q)- ffi + ,e'Q)le(r))> 0. Ifp(r)eAsatrsfi,es

2 i- + u'!,\) a p l z+) t p ( z )+2 i - + 6 z P ' ( z<) o q ( z-)t , J q ( a + q \ z) p \ z) p \ z) q \ z) then p(z) < q(z) o,ndq(z) zs the bestdominant. Proof. Let 0(ut) : au * pw2 + ] and @(ur) : 6fu. Then d(-) I 0 and 0(r), Q@) are analytic in A - {0} wliich contains q(A). Let the functio:nQQ) anclh(z) be defined by

Q Q )- z q ' ( z ) Q ( q Q D q: \6z4 ? . . , )

(z) h(z): 0(q("))+ QQ) : cvq(z) ' q+ ( z + ) '6zq' " q ( z ) + 0,tQ)2+

779

On SufficientConditions for Starlikeness Clearly QQ) is starlike and

20 ')' ' : Re{ioe t + 7 a"'L^|,(',) a ' ( z ) - l-- +'q|,Q) } t o. Lt\z) [d' W)* qA ]' The differential subordination r v p ( z+) d p ( 4 2+ j + 6 ' p ' ( ' ) < o q ( z )+ 0 q ( z ) 2+ - L * a ' n ' J ' ) q \ z) q \ z) p \ 2) p \ z) becomes e@Q)) * zp'(z)$(p(')) < 0(q(r))I zq'(z)$(q(r)), and the result follows, by using Theorem A. Corollary 2.I0. Let p and 6 be positiue numbers. If 0 I pQ) e y so,tisfies

ri_ z a p ( z ) + 4 p ( r ) t + +- d z p ' ( l . < a r - z * '' '((rr -+ r' \)' p(z) p(z)

262 r-z +)1+z-r-2,

then Re p(z) > 0. Proof. The result follows from Theorem 2.9 by taking q(z) : {f and replacing z2 i s cl earl y starl i ke. S i nce d b y -d . T h e n th e fu n c ti o n Q Q): -25zl l -

- a - 2 8 qo' ( : )' r 1 * z Q ' ( z \ 6^r) 6 6q(z) A

:-;(-)-T(n'*;(-).=t we have, with z :

eio

R .{ - i q t , -, T n ' ( z +) ; 6 + z Q ' ( z ) l Q: (',f),}" , ' 9 . 0 [ 0 T

By taking (t : l, C : 1 : 0 and d - -1, then we have the following result of Nunokawa et. al.l2l: Corollary2.II. If 0+p(z)e

Aand

p(z)++&.!Jff, t h e n R e p (z ) > 0 . T h e o r e m2 . I 2 . L e t a , l 3 a n d S b e c o m p l e r n u m b e r s , f6 0 . L e t 0 l q Q ) un'iualenti,n A and sati,sfythe follow'ing condit'ionsfor z e A:

e Abe

780

V Ravichandran and S S. Kumar

( 1) L e t QQ) : 6 z q ' (z )l q ' Q) b e starl i ke,

( 2 )R e{ 7 , f Q )+ T q ' Q ) - } + , Q ' Q ) l Q ( , )>i o Ifp(r)eAsati,sfies a p ( z ) +B p ( z ) 2 + +

p \ z)

) 2j + 6 z p - ' ( z<) o q (z ) + 0 q ( z +

q \ z)

p'\z)

+ d ' n u ' ,.1 ! q ' \ z)

then p(z) < q(z) and q(z) i,s the be,st d,om'inant. Tlie proof of this theorem is similar to that of Theorem 2.9 and therefore it is omitted. Corollary 2.I3. Let a,1 and 6 be posi,ti,uenumbers. If 0 I pQ) € y satisfies

''

a p ( ? ) + u p l ' ) ' +- ] p(r)

a'l'\')* o p2(z)

t *' r- z

+ ) (r-r

z\'-' ^!-' +11+,

262

-

o+*'

\1-./

t he n R e p (z ) > 0 . Proof. The result follows from the Theorem 2.I2 by taking q(z) : += and -Z6zl(l-t z)2 is clearly starlike. replacing d by -d. Then the functionQQ): Since

. , ', ( : )2-07=t .t ,' ,()2 oQ J+*, z+ e ' e ) _ _ o / r + z \ ' _ 2 8 ( l : : \ ' * -U d \l_./ 6* AG):-t\,_ri we have, with z :

(

-z J *,i 1 _ z d

6'io

^

R . - } o ' ( z- )' } n ' ( z+) } . t3} {

:

; , o r f' , * } - o I

B y ta k i n g a :

l .J :1 :0

i n Theorem 2.12,w e have the fol l ow i ng:

Corollary 2.L4. Let q(z) e A be uniualent dn L, q(4 I 0 starli,ke. If p(t) e A satisfies zp' (z) _. ,q' (r) p(r)2 q(z)2' then,p(z) < q(z). The domi,nantq is the best dominant.

3. Starlikeness Criteria

Let zq'(z)lqQ)2 be

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness

787

In this section, we give application of our results for getting suffi.cientconditions for starlikeness.Let -I < B < A< 1. The class S*\A,B] consistsof functions f e Ao satisfying

t J ? - ,' 7! ++B4z -' ' . z € a

f(r) -1] : In particular S*[1, S*, the class of starlike functions. For the class S*[A,B], we have the following: T h e o r e m S . l .L e t - 1 < B < A l L L e t a , { j a n d S s a t i , s fR ye(u-Br)> lu-BAl w h e r eu : | * a * 2 0 1 6 a n d u : 2 P A l 6 - ( 1 - a ) 8 . I f f ( r ) € A s a n d

4f ? l * + t c- -i /l fz({, '), (+' d , )( r * ' { , ; ( : ) ) l (r) L

\-'f'(r)/)

- B)z Az) + Az\'* . *- ( 7 - r * , -t \ (rr+ B z ) u " (( 1A *Bz)z' \1+Bz/ t h e nf ( z ) € S . I A ,B ) . Proof. Let p(z) :

Then a computationshowsthat

+&.

z p ' ( z )_

zf"(r)

t P ( z ) : 1+ P\z) ffi

Therefore, it follows that

3 l : ? l * + r o- 6 ) ' { ' , ?+)d " \(' t * ' { , i : ) ) l f(r) L-'\r

fQ)

f'(r)))

+e('))] 'i,',1 ..o',',, r"i3,i,',ee

-V- B), - o' ( 1 + . a z -*\ ' a / r + A z \ 2+ d a r ) + 4 . \r ) \r+ e+ Bzy IJsing Corollary 2.3, we have the result.

As a specialcase,we havethe following: Corollary 3.2. Let I + 21316 > 0. If f (r) e Ao and

z f ' ( zl), o _ 6 ) ' { ' , ? ) - ' f " ( ' ) \ l +t(. - 'C \ 1I (- r' /- ) ' * - 4-: (t zy' f a S r u r \ z ) \ ' * f , @) l then f (z) € ,S*.

V Ravichandran and S S. Kumar

782

The classSS. (^) of strongly starlike functions of order ,\ consistsof functions f e Ao satisfying

lo,* - \(:l:?\ /(') / I

\tr

<_. 2

Which is equivalent to the following:

+ & r ( i * ) ^ , z eL For this class,we havethe following : Theorem 3 . 3 .L e t- 1 < B < A < I . L e t a , p a n d 6s a t i ' s fRye ( u - B u ) > - l u - B u l y : ( 2 a f d+ t ) a n du : ( 2 a 1 6- I ) 8 . t f f ( r ) € A o a n d , where

'r 'l (,r'?)' r:l -l!!' "^\ -+ylf t '11 s'Y' ' + n ' r*!:!-:)'= / f@ ) l\}t'r

-rl/-\

-

)

/.+er\L

thenffi.\ffi)

The result can be obtained by using Corollary 2.7, with

p ( z ) : z f ' ( z ) l fQ ) . As a special case, we have Corollary 3.4. If f (r) e Ao and

'. y l ( a t J ? \ , ] -, !r .-*z,+' (,r. -6".,1, 2 ' *o\(/,({,(), . )' )2, * )

tn"n

ffi

r (}!)

+

[ \ r r , l) l

o, "quiualently f (z) zs stronsly starli,keof ord,er1/2.

Using Corollary 2.10 , with p(z) : zf'(z)lf

Q), we have the following result:

Theorem 3.5. Let p and 6 be posi.t'iuenumbers. If f (t) e As satxsfi,es '*tf?) r-z r+z z f " ( z \\ (a+d *u(\*"\'* ' f)(' zf ')( ' ) * a ( " f ' ( " ) , f , ( "-)u / 1t+ffi)t'1_ .-"\r-z/'r+,-r-,' ' \/(,)

252

t h e n f (z ) € ,S * . Using Corollary 2.I3 , with p(z):

tf'Q)If

(z),we have the following result:

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness Theorem 3.6. Let a,1

783

and 6 be posi,t'iuenumbers.

If f (r) e Ao sati,sfies

, z f r ' , ( 2+, )'a- ( , { ' , ( r . ) ) ' * , ' f -'((rz.)) - 6 " zf f (r) \ /(r) /

1 r

-L I

'-J l t t t\ ' -) t lt/-\

r \'t ,f'(r)

-"{.u(-)'*"thenf (z) e S. By taking a : Tirneskif3]:

13:

1 :

0, we have the following result of Obradovid and

Corollary 3.7. If f (z) e Ao sat'isfies 'l '- r l t t \t '- )l r -L I

_@- f ' ( " )

<1+

f (")

2z

G+*'

thenf(z)€,S*. U s i n g C o ro l l a ry 2 .2 , w i th a: foilowing result:

C:

0 and p(z) : ,f' (z)l f

(z), w e have the

Theorem3.8. Letl and 6 beposi,tiue numbers.If f (r) e As sat?,sfr,es rf"(") tfQ),62f'(z)(, zf'(z) f(r) \-'f'(r) !

t

t

_

_

!

_

"f'(r)\ f("))

r-z 262 'I+z'(I-z1z'

thenf (z) € ,S*. References

-

[1] Miller, S.S., Mocanu, P.T.:D'ifferent'ial Subordi,nations: Theory and, Applications, Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 225, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000. [2] Nunokawa, M., Owa, S., Takahashi, N., Saitoh, H.: Sufficient Conditions for Caratheodory Functions, Ind'ian J. pure appl. Math. 33(9), 1385-1390 (2002). [3] Obradovia, M., Thneski, N.: On the starlike criteria defined Silverman, Zesz. Nauk. Poli,tech.Rzesz., Mat. l8l(24), 59-64 (2000).

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness

E-mail: sivpk7l@yahoo.com. AMS Mathematics Subject Classification ..... zf'(z) l,o_6)'{',?) +t(. -'f"(')\l - CI(r-)'* 4:- f a Sru r\z) \'* f,@ )l -'\1-'/ - (t - zy' then f (z) € ,S* .

404KB Sizes 1 Downloads 295 Views

Recommend Documents

On Sufficient Conditions for Starlikeness
zp'(z)S@Q)) < 0(q(r)) * zq'(r)6@Q)), then p(z) < q(z)and q(z) i,s the best domi ..... un'iualent i,n A and sati,sfy the follow'ing condit'ions for z e A: .... [3] Obradovia, M., Thneski, N.: On the starlike criteria defined Silverman, Zesz. Nauk. Pol

on sufficient conditions for caratheodory functions
then. p(z) < q(z) and q(z) is the best dominant. 2. Sufficient Conditions ..... Department of Computer Applications. Sri Venkateswara College of Engineering.

On some sufficient conditions for distributed QoS ...
May 23, 2008 - other, we study sufficient conditions for determining whether a given set of minimum bandwidth .... In order to keep this paper as self-contained and accessible as possible, we recall along the way ... an optimal schedule has a rationa

On Some Sufficient Conditions for Distributed Quality-of ... - IEEE Xplore
that of an optimal, centralized algorithm. Keywords-distributed algorithms; quality-of-service (QoS); conflict graph; wireless networks; interference models; frac-.

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Distributed ...
The system is usually represented by a connectivity network modeled as a graph with vertices and links. ... focused on communication constraints on the network topol- ogy (e.g., time-varying connectivity [11], [12], ...... problem using MPC,” Inter

Necessary and sufficient conditions in the problem of ...
Savings account with zero interest rate. M - family of martingale ... Primal Problem u(x) = sup c,XT : X0=x,X≥0. E. [∫ T. 0. U1(t, ω,ct )dt + U2(ω,XT ). ] . Is u a utility ...

ON CONDITIONS FOR CONSTELLATIONS Christopher ...
Nov 17, 2010 - + : a, d, a, d. Let C denote the set of conditions given in Definition 1.1: C := {(C1), (C2), (C3), (C4)}. Theorem 1.3. C forms a set of independent defining conditions for a constellation. Proof. We present four counterexamples: C(C1)

Sufficient conditions for the existence of a path-factor which are related ...
1Department of Mathematical Information Science,. Tokyo University of ... For u ∈ V (G), we let NG(u) and dG(u) denote the neighborhood and the degree of.

Radii of Convexity and Strong Starlikeness for Some ...
and 1 q z r 1 y .. z are all convex functions in whose range is symmetric with respect to. Ž . the real axis, the class ST for these choices of functions reduces to the.

Bridgeland Stability Conditions on Fano Threefolds - Northeastern ...
When the Picard rank of X is 1, Theorem 1.1 was proved in [Li15] with Γ = 0 (the cases ... and by ANR-11-LABX-0040-CIMI within the program ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02; ...... to check that O(h) is β-stable, while for any m ≥ 2, the pull-back m∗O(h) ...

Conditions on option prices for absence of arbitrage ...
spreads, let us try to give some intuition on the conditions call prices should satisfy .... Finally, the options are cash settled: one, who holds a call, receives in cash the .... of the statistical measure, which are never known in advance (see Rem

Bridgeland Stability Conditions on Fano Threefolds - Northeastern ...
When the Picard rank of X is 1, Theorem 1.1 was proved in [Li15] with Γ = 0 (the cases ... and by ANR-11-LABX-0040-CIMI within the program ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02; ..... Let (α0,β0) be the top point on the semicircle W. By Lemma 3.4 the derivative ...

sufficient dimension reduction based on normal and ...
and intensity were a big part of what made possible for me to complete this work. ... 2.4 A look of functional data analysis and dimension reduction . . . . . 18 ...... Σ, facilitating model development by allowing visualization of the regression in

LDR a Package for Likelihood-Based Sufficient ...
more oriented to command-line operation, a graphical user interface is also provided for prototype .... entries. In the latter case, there are only two matrices G1 = Ip and G2 = eeT , where e ∈ Rp ..... Five arguments are mandatory when calling the

LDR a Package for Likelihood-Based Sufficient ...
We introduce a software package running under Matlab that implements several re ..... simple graphical user interface to make usage more intuitive and analysis ...

Feasibility Conditions for Interference Alignment
Dec 1, 2009 - Bezout's and Bernshtein's Theorems (Overview) - 1. ▻ Both provide # of solutions → Prove solvability indirectly .... Page 101 ...

God's Conditions For Revival
In 2 Chronicles 7.14, God names the four things we must do, .... America. The writer continues: In one of his meetings, however, everything was at a standstill. He gave himself to earnest prayer. "O God," he implored, "why ...... names of sporting pe