Measurements of Lightning Parameters Using Correlated Video and NLDN Data E. Philip Krider, Christopher J Biagi, Kenneth L Cummins, Stacy Fleenor, and Kenneth E. Kehoe Institute of Atmospheric Physics, University of Arizona

Video and NLDN Data

NLDN Report Date/Time: 8/05/05 03:39:18.562 Azimuth: 220° Range: 24 km Peak Current: +85.1 kA

The U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN)

2005, July 3 – 14 Mostly Individual, Short Lived Cells, in the late afternoon hours, a few supercells, and 2 MCS 2003,2004, April Mostly MCS

2003,2004,2005 Monsoon Storms August, September Southern Arizona 2003 – 671 Flashes 2004 – 426 Flashes 2005 – 390 Flashes Total Flashes = 1487

July,

Texas and Oklahoma 2003 – 59 Flashes 2004 – 308 Flashes

The Midwest 2005 – 412 Flashes

Total Flashes = 367

Total Flashes = 412

Lightning Parameters

Estimated Peak Current (Ip) of First Strokes Number of Strokes per Flash (Multiplicity) Number of Ground Contacts per Flash

How do these parameters vary with region?

Regional Comparisons No. of Video Strokes

No. of NLDN Strokes

NLDN Flash DE (%)

NLDN Stroke DE (%)

Mean Ip (SD) (kA)

Median Ip (kA)

94

94

-19.7 (10.5)

-16.9

AZ 2003-2004 First-strokes

1012

953

SS with NGC

444

355

80

-15.0 (11.2)

-15.4

SS in a PEC

1894

1247

67

-14.9 (8.3)

-12.7

86

-19.2 (17.8)

-13.8

TX-OK 2003-2004 First strokes

318

273

92

SS with NGC

126

101

80

-15.6 (8.5)

-13.9

SS in a PEC

338

270

80

-13.9 (8.0)

-12

80

-23.2 (13.6)

-19.5

GP 2005* First-strokes

112

90

91

SS with NGC

61

50

82

-19.4 (8.6)

-17.6

SS in a PEC

130

100

77

-17.5 (11.3)

-13.7

*Flashes not reported by the NLDN were assumed to have a negative polarity if the flash occurred in a negative dominated storm or if the flash had multiple strokes. All other uncorrelated flashes were assumed to be positive.

Peak Current for Negative First Strokes

Peak Current for Negative First Strokes

Peak Current for Negative First Strokes

The mean video multiplicity of negative flashes in AZ, TX-OK, and the GP for low and high |Ip|.

First Stroke Amplitude

No. of Flashes

% Single Stroke

Multiplicity Mean (SD)

AZ 2003-2004 |Ip| ≤ 10 kA

83

45

2.4 (2.0)

|Ip| > 10 kA

893

28

3.6 (2.7)

TX-OK 2003-2004 |Ip| ≤ 10 kA

72

52

2.3 (2.1)

|Ip| > 10 kA

238

32

2.7 (1.9)

GP 2005 |Ip| ≤ 10 kA

8

75

1.6 (1.3)

|Ip| > 10 kA

82

44

2.5 (1.9)

Percentage of negative flashes that produced the number of ground contacts (GC)

No. of GC

AZ (%)

TX-OK (%)

GP (%)

1

68.3

70.0

68.0

2

23.7

22.3

16.1

3

6.0

8.4

10.7

4

1.4

0

6.25

5

0.6

0.3

0

Mean GC per flash

1.42

1.40

1.56

7/10/05 5 pm

7/11/05 9 pm

N = 45, 95% positive

N = 106, 89% positive Tornado Warning

7/7/05 4 pm N = 13, 100% positive

7/05/05 4pm N = 20, 0% positive

7/6/05 5 pm N = 30, 10 % positive

7/5/05 5 pm N = 12, 100% positive 7/13/05 8 pm N = 15, 0% positive 7/03/05 7pm

7/06/05 1pm

N = 34, 0% positive

N = 23, 0% positive

7/4/05 4 pm

7/4/05 9 pm

N = 10, 100% positive

N = 16, 93% positive

Tornado Warning

Tornado Warning

Table 1. Summary of Measurements in the Great Plains in 2005

Date

Recording Interval (min)

Video Flashes

Flashes (%) Reported by NLDN

Video Strokes

Strokes (%) Reported by NLDN

Mean Video Multiplicity

Session Polarity (%)

3 July

60

31

30 (97)

75

61 (81)

2.42

Negative (100)

4 July

28

10

7 (70)

10

7 (70)

1.00

Positive (100)

5 July

72

16

15 (94)

25

18 (72)

1.56

Positive (94)

5 July

41

4

4 (100)

5

5 (100)

1.25

Positive (100)

6 July

18

20

19 (95)

57

46 (81)

2.85

Negative (100)

6 July

23

12

12 (100)

13

12 (92)

1.08

Positive (92)

6 July

104

23

19 (83)

51

40 (78)

2.22

Negative (100)

6 July

6

3

3 (100)

15

10 (67)

5.00

Negative (100)

7 July

103

30

28 (93)

33

31 (94)

1.10

Positive (100)

7 July

31

8

8 (100)

33

26 (79)

4.13

Negative (100)

7 July

14

13

12 (92)

14

13 (93)

1.08

Positive (100)

10 July

18

6

5 (83)

6

5 (83)

1.00

Positive (100)

10 July

83

45

42 (93)

49

43 (88)

1.09

Positive (98)

11 July

84

88

78 (89)

105

93 (89)

1.19

Positive (92)

11 July

11

12

10 (83)

12

10 (83)

1.00

Positive (100)

11 July

10

6

6 (100)

6

6 (100)

1.00

Positive (100)

13 July

60

15

14 (93)

37

32 (86)

2.47

Negative (100)

Positives

227

204 (90)

237

210 (89)

1.04

Negatives

111

104 (94)

300

239 (80)

2.70

Bipolars

4

4 (100)

9

9 (100)

2.25

All Data

342

312 (91)

546

458 (84)

Estimated Peak Current - Negative and Positive First Strokes 14 N Mean Ip Median Ip SD

12

Negative 91 23.3 kA 19.6 kA 13.6 kA

Positive 205 48.7 kA 44.7 kA 24.1 kA

8

6 Negative Positive 4

2

Ip (kA)

10 5 11 0 11 5 12 0 12 5 13 0 13 5 14 0 14 5 15 0

95 10 0

85 90

80

70 75

60 65

50 55

40 45

30 35

20 25

10 15

5

0 0

Number

10

Peak Current for Positive First Strokes

200 45

180 40

N = 104 Flashes Neg. Mean: 2.81 strokes/flash

Number of Flashes

30

25

20

15

Number of Flashes

160 35

N = 204 Flashes Pos. Mean: 1.04 strokes/flash

140 120 100 80 60

10

40

5

20 0

0 1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

11

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Strokes per Flash

Strokes per Flash

200

80

180

70

N = 104 flashes Neg. Mean: 1.58 contacts/flash

50

40

30

Number of Flashes

Number of Flashes

160

60

140

N = 204 flashes Pos. Mean: 1.02 contacts/flash

120 100 80 60

20 40

10

20 0

0 1

2

3

Ground Contacts per Flash

4

1

2

3

Ground Contacts per Flash

4

11

0 ms

277 ms

Estimated Peak Current - Negative Strokes 20 First Strokes 91 N 23.3 kA Mean Ip 19.6 kA Median Ip 13.6 kA SD

18 16

Normal Subsequent 98 17.2 kA 13.7 kA 11.1 kA

14

10 8 First Strokes

6

Normal Sub. 4 2

Ip (kA)

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

0

Number

12

Estimated Peak Current - Negative Strokes 12

N Mean Ip Median Ip SD

10

First Strokes 91 23.3 kA 19.6 kA 13.6 kA

New Contacts 47 18.9 kA 16.7 kA 8.7 kA

6

4 First strokes New Ground Contact 2

Ip (kA)

75

70

65

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 0

Number

8

Measurements of Lightning Parameters Using ...

Aug 5, 2005 - N = 10, 100% positive. Tornado Warning. 7/03/05 7pm. N = 34, 0% positive. 7/4/05 9 pm. N = 16, 93% positive. Tornado Warning. 7/05/05 4pm. N = 20, 0% positive. 7/06/05 1pm. N = 23, 0% positive. 7/6/05 5 pm. N = 30, 10 % positive. 7/7/05 4 pm. N = 13, 100% positive. 7/10/05 5 pm. N = 45, 95% positive.

1MB Sizes 2 Downloads 254 Views

Recommend Documents

Sound insulation evaluation using transfer function measurements
With the new available front-end devices ... If in the time domain ISO/DIS 18233 [3] suggests to use the Schoroeder energy integration method to get ... the space-time average sound pressure level, in dB, inside the cabin under test. The most ...

Sound insulation evaluation using transfer function measurements
domain, it is better to use MLS or Sweep Sine technique respectively, to get the impulse ... method to get the sound pressure difference level between two rooms.

Art. 34 Optimization of sanding parameters using response surface ...
Art. 34 Optimization of sanding parameters using response surface methodology.pdf. Art. 34 Optimization of sanding parameters using response surface ...

Lightning
Answered in correct and complete sentences. 20. Quiz Questions answered. (Give yourself 2 points per correct answer – get the key from your teacher). TOTAL.

Using bulk radiocarbon measurements to estimate soil organic matter ...
This chapter outlines a strategy for using bulk soil radiocarbon measurements to estimate soil organic matter turnover in native, cultivated and recovering soil.

PID Parameters Optimization by Using Genetic Algorithm Andri ... - arXiv
But there are some cases where we can't use these two tuning methods, i.e. the ..... Richard C. Dorf, Robert H. Bishop, Modern Control Systems 10th Edition, ...

High-precision laser range measurements using ...
Itcomprises a laser diode (1), an optical receiver (2) (photon detector and linear amplifier), a resonator (3) for convolution, an ADC (4) and software processing ...

Using aircraft measurements to estimate the magnitude ...
cloud-free conditions of the biomass burning aerosol characterized by measurements made ...... and therefore offered an explanation of the discrepancy in.

Multi-terminal electrical transport measurements of molybdenum ...
Dec 22, 2014 - 4KU-KIST Graduate School of Converging Science and Technology, Korea ..... Supplementary Information S2) All samples were obtained by exfoliation .... mechanisms limiting the carrier mobility of MoS2, the Hall mobility ...

Statistical evaluation of parameters estimating ...
Feb 1, 2012 - Statistical evaluation of parameters estimating autocorrelation and individual heterogeneity in longitudinal studies. Sandra Hamel1*, Nigel G.

EFFECT OF CONTROLLED ROLLING PARAMETERS ...
temperature was elevated from 1100°C to 1200°C indicated that copper ... The strain degree applied during the roughing phase increased the ageing response ...

Raman Thermometry Measurements of Free ...
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of California, Berkeley, California. 94720, and Chemical Sciences DiVisions, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,. Berkeley, California 94720. Received May 22 ..... measured temperature data

Copy of MEASUREMENTS- By EasyEngineering.net.pdf
Copy of MEASUREMENTS- By EasyEngineering.net.pdf. Copy of MEASUREMENTS- By EasyEngineering.net.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Characteristics of meteorological parameters ...
R. Gautam, G. Cervone, R. P. Singh,1 and M. Kafatos ... and r and E are constants. ..... Hong, X. D., S. W. Chang, S. Raman, L. K. Shay, and R. Hodur (2000),.

Improvement in Performance Parameters of Image ... - IJRIT
IJRIT International Journal of Research in Information Technology, Volume 2, Issue 6, ... Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Technocrats Institute of Technology ... Hierarchical Trees (SPIHT), Wavelet Difference Reduction (WDR), and ...

Determining the Parameters of Axiomatically Derived ...
An Application Based on Reported. Well Being in Colombia ... do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Inter-American Development Bank, its Executive Directors, or the countries they ..... were computed taking into consideration the estima

Three-dimensional morphological measurements of ...
Nov 23, 2012 - were taken at X-ray energies that can provide clear contrast between LCO and NMC particles in the composite cathodes. ... Journal of Power Sources 227 (2013) 267e274 ... during preparation, all cathode samples were gently cut with ....

Electrokinetic measurements of dielectric properties of ... - Springer Link
Dec 30, 2006 - C Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007. Abstract The ... complexities and barrier functions of cell membrane, re- spectively, and could ...

Inferring the parameters of the neutral theory of ...
This theme has received a great deal of attention in the recent literature, and tests have .... The unified neutral theory of biodiversity: do the numbers add up?

Significance of Parameters of the Conic Equation ...
THE CONIC EQUATION HOUGH TRANSFORM FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS. 1. Significance of ... for each set of points, it has a relatively low time complexity. The advantage of the ... building identification from satellite images also uses the linear Hough ... left

LiDAR- Based Estimation of Canopy Fuel Parameters of Tree ...
the fieldwork and LiDAR was done. R2 was also computed to test relationship. between the two datasets. VILLAR, R. G. et al. - CMUJS Vol. 20, No.3 (2016) 140-149. Page 3 of 10. LiDAR- Based Estimation of Canopy Fuel Parameters of Tree Plantation in Bu

comparison of color parameters of red wines produced from ... - vitis
where L is visual lightness. Although the wine color plays a major role in the final quality of red ..... Sh.Z(Vl)n. Reddish-orange 65.24 49.06 12.62 0.51 0.39 0.099 47.05 59.78 75.49. Sh.Z(Tr)n. Orange-pink. 59.91 44.73. 11. 0.52 0.39 0.095 46.65 59