Vision Statement and School Improvement Plan ____________________________________________________________________________
James Morris School 2017-2018
1
Contributors Staff
Parents
Students
Morris Board of Education Members
Tracy Barger
Tina Maritano
Susan Coffey
Mark Barone
Dan Coutu
KC Chapman
Robin Moore
Kevin Curley
Grace Dotson
Heather Jones
Barbara Connery
Pam Panasci
Margie Groht
Finley Edds
Chrissie Lauretano
Maria Cook
Karen Prado
Jennifer Finch
Zoe Fenn
Gina Fleming
Bruce Richard
Jamie Kingsley
Charlie Groht
Sharon Kozikowski
Laurie Sweet
Chrissie Lauretano
Sophie Taylor
Jean Leonard
Holly Torrant
Jessica Souza
Heather Mahar
Sarah White
Denise Weik
Carrie Maillet
Alisa Wright
2
3
School Improvement Vision Curriculum
CURRICULUM will be regularly analyzed, adjusted and strengthened to align with the rigor of Connecticut State Standards across all content areas.
Instruction
INSTRUCTION will be driven by individual student need (personalized learning).
Assessment
Multiple forms of ASSESSMENT (qualitative and quantitative) will be used to measure progress and inform decisions.
Positive School Climate
POSITIVE SCHOOL CLIMATE will align with the mission, vision, core values and goals of the school.
4
Performance Summary
5
6
Needs Assessment Quantitative Evidence of Areas for Focus Curriculum ● SBA ○ 47% of students in Gr.4-6 met their SBA goal for ELA. ○ 63% of Grades 3-6 students “at grade level” for Math, per SBA (59%, per STAR) ○ 51% of students in Gr.4-6 met their SBA goal for Math. ● STAR Reading ○ K: 57% of students grew at least 50 SGP points (Early Literacy) ○ Gr.5: 67% of students grew at least 50 SGP points ○ Gr.6: 55% of students grew at least 50 SGP points (50% of students with IEP reading goals) ● STAR Math ○ Gr.1: 60% of students grew at least 50 SGP points (Early Literacy) ○ Gr.2: 32% of students grew at least 50 SGP points ○ Gr.3: 62% of students grew at least 50 SGP points ○ Gr.4: 40% (2 of 5) students with IEP math goals reach 50 SGP ○ Gr.5: 44% of students grew at least 50 SGP points ○ Gr.6: 0 of 7 students with IEP math goals reached 50 SGP Instruction ● 2016 Parent Survey: 57% feel their child is expected to meet high expectations (down from 74%) ● 2017 September Parent Survey: One of lowest scoring questions was “Based on the work I have seen to this point, I feel that my child is being challenged appropriately.” ● 2017 September Student Survey: 75% of students feel that students follow the teacher’s directions right away 7
Assessment ● Per Student Survey (Grades 4-6): ○ “Doing well in school is important to me” increased from 93% to 98%. ● Per Staff Survey ○ 67% of staff responded that they have ready access to student achievement data for their students. ○ 89% of staff say “Teachers actively use student achievement data in collaboration with peers on a regular basis.” Climate ● 2017 September Student Survey: 44% of students report that “We are being taught about bullying and how to prevent it.” ● 2017 September Student Survey: 74% of students report that “Students are well behaved” ● 2017 September Student Survey: 30% of students report that “I have been bullied by someone this school year” ● 2017 September Parent Survey: Lowest-scoring questions: ○ “The school has in place clear and effective anti-bullying measures.” ○ “The general sense in the parent community is one of positivity and satisfaction regarding JMS.” ● 2016 Student Survey of Grades 4-6: 56% feel that students are well behaved (57% two years ago) ● 2016 Parent Survey: 52% feel bullying is a problem (up from 36% in 2014) ● 2016 Staff Survey: 25% of CLASSIFIED Staff responded positively to, “The students in my school/school district show respect for our teachers.” ● 2016 Staff Survey: 38% of staff (56% of certified staff) responded positively to, “I know the specifics of how my school/district intends to improve student achievement in the coming year.”
8
Qualitative Evidence of Areas for Focus Curriculum ● Apparent gaps between written curriculum and implemented curriculum, e.g. higher-order reading, writing and math skills ● Per Parents: The role of handwriting and keyboarding skills needs to be clarified ● Per Parents: Hands-on science and multicultural awareness appears limited ● Per Parents: Communication of age-appropriate supplemental resources for parents looking to further challenge students and provide them with extension learning opportunities Instruction ● Need for raised expectations in upper grades, as evidenced by engagement and students’ performance on rigorous standards-based assessments ● Per Students: Increase opportunities to work with students from other classes ● Per Students: Increase opportunities for hands-on learning ● Per Students: Increase opportunities for movement during the day ● Per Students: Add a greenhouse and real-world things to explore in the science lab (e.g engine, microscopes, construction apps) Assessment ● Apparent gaps between local assessments and standardized-based assessments, e.g. SBA, AchieveTheCore Climate ● Students’ academic-stamina, attention to detail, work completion, growth mindset ● Per Students: Bus behaviors
9
Focus Area Initiatives
One core initiative for each priority that will drive our improvement efforts. Each initiative should: • Be research-based • Directly/indirectly impact student achievement • Be high leverage Curriculum ● JMS educators will help all students meet district expectations for mastery and growth through the use of mathematics and ELA curricula BY ○ Identifying priority standards for each grade-level ○ Pacing and planning accordingly ○ Focusing on mastery of skills in sequence along the progressions ○ Utilizing checklists and assessments to measure progress ○ Continuously reviewing data, reflecting collaboratively, and adjusting our approach as necessary Instruction ● JMS educators will help all students meet district expectations for mastery and growth through the use of Mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) instruction BY ○ Implementing a common understanding and approach to the communication of Learning Targets and Success Criteria ○ Utilizing the a “workshop” model of instruction to encourage students’ communication, complex thinking and problem solving, and vocabulary ○ Providing students with increased opportunities for rigorous, multifaceted learning tasks and assessments. Assessment ● JMS educators will help all students meet district expectations for mastery and growth through the use of Mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) assessment BY ○ Reflecting upon their learning on an ongoing basis ○ Tracking and documenting their own growth and areas of need ○ Developing a growth-mindset ○ Articulating and celebrating their own learning (e.g. student-led conferences, Celebration of Learning) 10
○ Preparing for the rigors of standards-based assessments of grade-level expectations ● Teachers will actively analyze student achievement data in collaboration with peers, coaches and administrators on a regular basis, including ○ Data-review meetings ○ PLC meetings ○ Grade-level meetings ○ Coaching meetings ● High Stakes Assessment Participation: JMS will have a 95% or greater student participation rate in high stakes assessment for the 2017-18 school year. Climate ● JMS staff will help students maximize their learning opportunities, academic production, and preparation for future challenges BY ○ Implementing a whole-school common understanding of expectations - behavioral, professional, social, and academic ○ Practicing habits of a growth mindset ○ Emphasizing and celebrating independent reading ○ Inviting the community to be active participants in our school culture.
11
School Improvement Goals and Action Plans Curriculum VISION Curriculum will be regularly analyzed, adjusted and strengthened to align with the rigor of Connecticut State Standards across all content areas. GOAL-1 ● Math: Teachers and administrators will identify gaps and overlaps, specifically in the area of fractions. STRATEGY ● Math: Driven by regular data reviews by teachers, coaches, and administration, JMS will supplement, refine, and align existing math curriculum to address gaps in whole-district student performance data. Implementer Administrator
Resources Needed
Action(s)
Assessment Method(s)
Ongoing: Facilitate and support teachers in developing pacing and long term planning
● Cover sheets ● Time with teachers at grade-level meetings
● PD feedback from teachers ● Completion of Cover Sheets and long-term plans
Ongoing: Analyze math-unit formative assessment data and STAR screenings, and follow-up with teachers and coaches about the curriculum-based lessons being done to address students’ needs in identified areas of focus
● Student-data files ● STAR progress monitoring data ● Curriculum pacing guides
Notes from coaches meetings and one-on-one meetings with teachers
12
Teachers & Math Coach
By the end of February grade-level meetings: ● Map the progression and percentage of curriculum time devoted to fractions and major works (by grade)
● Curriculum ● District Calendar
● Minutes from grade-level meetings ● Curriculum doc revisions
Teachers & Math Coach
Ongoing: Refining the strategies to instruct fractions appropriately at each grade level
● ● ● ●
Minutes/observations/reflections from coach’s time with teachers
Teachers, Math Coach & Administrators
Ongoing: Assess student progress toward grade-level standards in fractions and prerequisite skills
● Fraction assessments from math curriculum ● STAR screenings and progress-monitoring ● Smarter Balance IABs and Mini-assessments from Achieve the Core
Curriculum Instructional coaches Professional videos Progression documents
13
Notes and documented adjustments that result from ongoing analysis of student progress
VISION Curriculum will be regularly analyzed, adjusted and strengthened to align with the rigor of Connecticut State Standards across all content areas. GOAL-2 ● ELA: Teachers and administrators will identify priority standards and benchmarks for each grade-level which includes a focus on critical, analytical READING and WRITING. Students will also be given regular opportunities for LISTENING and responding analytically. STRATEGY ● ELA: Teachers, coaches, and administrators will supplement, refine, and align existing ELA curriculum to address gaps in whole-district student performance data. Action(s)
Resources Needed
Administrators
Ongoing, at grade-level meetings: ● Facilitate teachers’ creation/revision of “Cover sheets” that identify units, pacing, and grade level expectations ● Provide teachers with models and guidance and models for calendar-based pacing and prioritizing of standards
● Cover Sheet template for each grade ● Models of pacing and standards-prioritization ● Time for teachers, coaches and administrators to work together (i.e. grade-level / PD time)
Cover Sheets created throughout the year
Instructional Coaches
Ongoing: ● Introducing a standard close-reading protocol (3-6) ● Introduce and model higher-level questioning techniques (3-6)
● https://nieonline.com/tbti mes/downloads/CCSS_re ading.pdf ● Close-reading protocols ● DOK resources on questioning ● Calkins Learning Progression
● Gr. 3-6 teachers’ adoption and observed usage of close-reading protocol ● Gr. 3-6 teachers’ adoption and observed usage of higher-level questioning techniques ● Ongoing (bi-monthly) reflective-discussion notes
Implementer
● Observe and facilitate reflective discussion with teachers (3-6)
14
Assessment Method(s)
Instructional Coach
During October PD, and Ongoing: ● Introduce/review phonological awareness study procedures and scope and sequence
● Sounds Sensible
● Teachers’ PD-feedback forms on Sound Sensible program introduced/reviewed during Oct PD ● Notes from coaching session
Teachers
Ongoing: ● Find and create listening and responding activities ● Provide explicit instruction on how to listen to and follow directions ● Develop higher-level questioning techniques ● Find/develop a listening rubric
● ReadWorks ● Responsive C lassroom books ● DOK questioning resources
● Teachers will find and create activities to encourage listening and responding ● Teacher created checklist to track students following directions ● Listening rubrics created for all classrooms
15
Instruction VISION: Instruction will be driven by individual student need (personalized learning). GOAL(S): ● Teachers will clearly articulate the goal and expectations for success, as measured by average growth on observational rubric(s), e.g. Learning Target & Success Criteria Rubric. ● Teachers to increase the level of rigor within assigned tasks, as measured by average growth on Depth-of-Knowledge (DOK) rubric(s), e.g. DOK Look-Fors’ Rubric. STRATEGY ● Teachers, coaches, and administrators will use the Learning Target & Success Criteria Rubric to reflect upon lesson planning and implementation ● Teachers, coaches, and administrators will use the DOK rubric / look-fors document to reflect upon lesson planning and implementation Implementer
Resources Needed
Action(s)
Assessment Method(s)
Admininstrator
August 2017: Provide staff with clearly-articulated expectations for learning targets and success criteria and DOK
Rubric for learning targets and success criteria, and Depth of Knowledge rubrics
● Walkthroughs ● Informal observations ● Formal observations
Administrator
Ongoing: Model expectations for learning target and success criteria during professional development and staff activities
Reflection/Feedback tool
Teachers’ feedback (e.g. exit ticket, reflection, survey)
Administrator
Ongoing: Provide feedback to teachers and coaches regarding students’ awareness of learning target and success criteria
Scheduled time for walkthough observations and check-ins with students
One-on-one meeting notes
16
All teachers and coaches
Ongoing: Post both learning targets and success criteria for all lessons
Rubric for learning targets and success criteria
Feedback on LT/SC rubric from: ● Walkthroughs ● Informal observations ● Formal observations
Teachers and coaches
By December: Demonstrate proficiency writing and communicating high-quality learning targets and success criteria
● Rubric and examples from administration ● Grade-level time to discuss
Exit ticket/survey of learning (December grade levels)
By February: Demonstrate proficiency in creating a structure that promotes students’ contributions to the development and/or revision of success criteria prior to activity
Check-ins/Feedback from students
Feedback from administrator
Decline in student misunderstandings and/or under-performances
By June: Demonstrate proficiency in creating a structure that promotes students’ self-reflection relative to the success criteria.
Grade level discussions on student contributions to success criteria
Increase in student success
All teachers and coaches
Feedback from coaches
17
Feedback on LT/SC rubric from: ● Walkthroughs ● Informal observations ● Formal observations Feedback on LT/SC rubric from: ● Walkthroughs ● Informal observations ● Formal observations
Assessment VISION: Multiple forms of assessment (qualitative and quantitative) will be used to measure progress and inform decisions. GOAL(S): ● Students will gain greater exposure to and and experience with rigorous standards-based assessments and be better prepared for rigorous assessments (e.g. Smarter Balanced Assessment SBA), as measured by the frequency and number of such opportunities this school year versus the prior year. STRATEGY ● Teachers, coaches, and administrators will use the Learning Target & Success Criteria Rubric to reflect upon lesson planning and implementation. ● Teachers will, on an ongoing basis, collect both quantitative and qualitative measures of student performance. Implementer Instructional Coaches
Resources Needed
Assessment Method(s)
● Readworks articles with a listening component ● SBA Interims/Practice tests, ● Achieve3000 ● Newsela ● F&P Continuum ● Podcasts ● (other?)
Grade-specific list of assessments provided to teachers and principal
Action(s) By November 1st: Identify and share with teachers grade-appropriate rigorous standards-based assessments By December 1st: Ensure that each teacher has a plan to incorporate grade-appropriate rigorous standards-based assessments throughout the rest of the year. Throughout Remainder of Year: Check-in and provide support for teachers as they implement their plan
Collect notes and/or copy of each teacher’s plan for incorporating grade-appropriate rigorous standards-based assessments on an ongoing basis Notes from meetings with teachers
18
Teachers
By November 1st: Meet with instructional coaches to identify grade-appropriate rigorous standards-based assessments
Grade-specific list of assessments in hand.
By December 1st: Draft a calendar/plan to incorporate grade-appropriate rigorous standards-based assessments throughout the rest of the year.
Copy of calendar/plan given to instructional coaches
Throughout Remainder of Year: Implement plan, thereby ensuring that students have more opportunities for standards-based assessments this school year than they did last school year
Students’ performance results on respective assessments
Meet in PLCs to reflect on assessment results and instructional practices that will positively affect student progress. Administrator
Meeting time with instructional coaches
Ongoing: Meet with instructional coaches to strategies on how best to support teachers and students during this implementation Review and document effectiveness of implementation
PLC meeting time
PLC minutes
Ongoing meetings with coaches
Coaches’ notes Teachers’ plans Observations Students’ performance results
Documentation from coaches. Time in classrooms 19
Positive School Climate
VISION James Morris School’s climate will align with the mission, vision, core values and goals of the school. GOAL 100% of students will report a positive perception of the JMS learning environment, including student- and staff-behaviors, professionalism and quality of work. STRATEGY Regularly teach, practice, and recognize positive school behaviors, high expectations for personal growth, etiquette, and social interactions in the classroom and hallways. Implementer
Action(s)
Resources Needed
Administrator
● Lead the development and implementation of a school-wide common understanding of expectations for behaviors, professionalism and quality of work.
● Input from staff, students and parents ● Ongoing communications with students, staff and families
● ● ● ● ●
● Morning-meeting time in each classroom ● Lunch with small groups of students
● Calendar of meetings ● Notes from meetings ● Student-survey results
● School climate meetings ● Principal’s Coffee meetings ● Written c ommunications to community
● Notes from meetings ● Parent-survey results ● Copies o f written communications
First Trimester: ● Communicate expectations to all students
● Communicate expectations to parents and community
20
Assessment Method(s) Student surveys Parent surveys Staff surveys Notes from parent meetings Incident reports
School Psychologist
Classroom Teachers
● Monthly check-ins with teachers and staff regarding student behaviors ● Facilitate Second Step lessons in each classroom (weekly) ● Facilitate Friendship Groups during lunch (including both typical students and at-risk students) ● Facilitate lessons and activities for all students addressing bullying prevention in the month of October ● Facilitate Anti-Bullying Awareness Month activities (October) ● Facilitate JMS’s response to the districtwide Kindness Initiative
● Administration support for programs and time in schedule to implement them
● Incident reports (monthly) ● Observation data related to targeted social skills ● Student surveys
● Teach/Model Whole Body Listening ● Using visuals, model appropriate circle time behavior on the rug ● Reinforcement for rug behaviors ● Teach, model, and facilitate students’ practice of desired behaviors ● Track on/off task behavior ● Adjust focus areas based on tracked data ● Introduce and use SLANT for active engagement: “Sit up,
● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●
Behavior Sticker Chart Stickers Whole Body Listening rubric Visual cues Teacher created progress chart Incentive system Visual cues/reminders Administrator observation of students ● Individual student recording sheet ● Students need access to Google Calendar
● Graph on chart paper the number of teacher interventions ● Tallies of off-task behaviors ● Graphed trends ● Tally marks tracking disruptive (off task) behavior with incentives (iPad choice time) to decrease the interruptions, therefore increasing on task behavior ● Students reflect each day to
21
Instructional Coaches
Listen, Ask and answer questions, Nod your head, Track the speaker” ● Facilitate end of day discussion about behavior and setting a goal for the next day ● Teach and use nonverbal signals to communicate with students ● Build appropriate social skills (use words to request break or state feelings; take 5 breathing) ● Build self-calming strategies to increase self-regulation behavior
● Model hw assignments, done by teacher as a model, posted on hw for nightly reference.
● Explicitly teach oratory skills utilizing a speaking rubric ● Facilitate leadership club (LAW), and promote service learning from within ● Collect evidence (qualitative and quantitative) on student discourse ● Facilitate reflective conversations around data collected on quantitative and qualitative on student discourse ● Work with teacher to create short and long-term goals ● Provide professional development on the 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions, which promote student discourse
● Collaboration/Planning/ Reflection time with 5th and 6th grade teachers in district and a Ford’s Theatre teaching artist ● Modeling of lessons ● Write oratory curriculum ● Conduct weekly leadership club meetings inviting guest speakers when possible ● Collaboration time with teachers ● Time to go into teachers classrooms during their math time for coaching
● ● ● ● ●
22
create a goal for the following day. Individual student behavior record, as needed. Tracking-the-speaker tallies Students’ weekly reflections on their poster and set goals for the next week. Tally chart for quality homework Tally Sheet earning Monthly Golden ___ Awards (Specials)
● Students’ growth on oratory rubric ● Student engagement survey ● Classroom-data collection ● Monitoring of teachers’ goals ● Notes / Minutes from teacher meetings and PD sessions
23