How  Can  We  Understand  Ethical  Consumer?   the  Case  of  Fair  Trade  Consumer

Yosuke  Hatayama     WASEDA  university

     

1

IntroducBon     2

Ethical  Consumer Ethical  Consumer  :  the  consumer  who  takes  posiBve  choice                      the  eco-­‐friendly  goods  or  social  responsible                      goods    or  who  rejects  not  eco-­‐friendly                                        goods    or  not  social  responsible  goods. ■Example   Green  purchasing  ,      AnB-­‐sweatshop  consumpBon,        BoycoM,   Organic  food  or  clothe,        Reject  geneBcally  modified  foods,     ProtecBon  of  human  rights  through  consumpBon,        Fair   Trade

3

Fair  Trade Fair  Trade:the  trade  which  pay  fair  price  to  producer  in  the                third  world  and  guarantee  their  minimum  standard                of  living,  working,  and  educaBon.    

FLO(Fairtrade  Label  OrganisaBon)   decides  the  standards  and  cerBfies   producers  and  any  other  stakeholders.         Figure  1        FLO  Label  logo  

4

Transi;on  of  the  World  Sales     (million  €)

5000   4000   3000   2000   1000   0  

2000年 2001年 2002年 2003年 2004年 2005年 2006年 2007年 2008年 2009年 2010年

Figure  2        Change  of  the  Sales  of  Fair  Trade  Goods  

5

Japanese  Sales  in  the  World 100  million  ¥    

1420   1222  

412  

343  

272  

207  

117   105   98  

88   83   74   66   50   49   22   14  

Figure  3        Japanese  Sales  of  Fair  Trade  in  the  World(2008)  

6

What  kind  of  People  is  the  Consumer  ? ■UK   Department  for  InternaBonal  Development  of  UK(2009)   ・Mainly  Wemen     ・High  income  and  high  educaBon   ■JAPAN   JETRO(2006)、Watanabe(2010)   ・Mainly  Wemen   ・White  Color   ・Middle  or  High  income   ⇒ What  social  consciousness  affect  consumer  behavior  ?  

7

 Hypothesis     8

An;-­‐consumerism?   Consumer  society   ⇒ Fall  of  Public  Man  (Sennet  1976)        Excess  of  self  (Lasch  1979)        PromoBon  of  privaBzaBon(Bauman  2001)     Consumerism・・・ the  way  of  thinking  to  achieve  self-­‐realizaBon                through  daily  consumpBon     It  is  said  that  consumerism  make  people  selfish  and  apacy.   ⇒Ethical  consumpBon  as  the  criBcism  of  consumerism   (Elkinton  and  Hailes  1988)     ⇒Whether  is  fair  trade  consumpBon  based  on  the  spirits  of  annB-­‐ consumerism  or  not?  

9

Poli;cal  awareness?   R.  Inglehart(1977)   The  more  society  develop,  the  more  poliBcal  awareness  is   increase  .   M.  Micheleg(2003)   Ethical  consumers  aMempt  to  exemplify  own  poliBcal  agtude   through  daily  shopping.   D.  Shaw  T.  Newholm  and  R.  Dickinson(2006)   Ethical  consumpBon  is  the  aMempt  to  reflect  own  poliBcal   opinion  as  like  “voBng”.     ⇒Whether  is  fair  trade  consumpBon  based  on  poliBcal   awareness  or  not?  

10

Self-­‐actualiza;on?   F.  Trentmann(2007)   Ethical  consumes  are  not  only  public  ciBzen,  but  consumerist.   They  are  “ciBzen-­‐consumer”.   K.  Soper(2007)   Ethical  consumers  aMempt  to  create  individuality  lifestyles  and   moBvated  by  self-­‐fulfilling  desire.     Ethical  consumpBon  is  not  based  on  anB-­‐consumerism,  but  a   kind  of  consumerism.     ⇒Whether  is  fair  trade  consumpBon  based  on  Self-­‐ actualizaBon  needs  or  not?.?

11

 Data     12

 Table  1      Diversified  Consuming  Life  Survey  (2010) Primary  body  

Global  ConsumpBon  Research  Society

Entrustment  

Central  Research  Services

Method   Period   Sampling   PopulaBon   Sample  design  

QuesBonnaire  survey  (Mailing  method) From  September  to  October,  2010 Tow-­‐stage  random  sampling     using  basic  resident  register the  age  from15  to  69  in  Tokyo  (within  the   range  of  40km  from  Shinjuku  staBon) 4000

Efficiency  percentage  

44.5%

Number  of  responses

1775

13

Table2      Variables Average SD   Note   0.07   0.25   Dummy  variable(○=1、×=0) Fair  trade  consumpBon   0.54   0.50   Dummy  variable(Woman=1、Man=0) Sex  (ref.  Woman) 44.48   15.54   Age Household  Income 4.38   2.27   11  category 13.91   2.11   Years  of  schooling Health  consideraBons 0.00   1.00   Principal  component  score  of  3  variable Environmental  consideraBons 1.72   1.47   Added  score  of  6  variable 〈Public  awareness〉 2.89   0.84   4  choice  quesBons   PoliBcal  interest                  Social  support  for  the  weak 3.15   0.72   4  choice  quesBons                  Sacrifice  of  my  life  for  public 2.31   0.85   4  choice  quesBons 〈OrientaBon  to  consumpBon〉 3.32   0.70   4  choice  quesBons   Lifestyle 2.15   0.82   4  choice  quesBons                  Fashion 2.49   0.87   4  choice  quesBons   DifferenBaBon 2.11   0.89   4  choice  quesBons   Brand 2.85   0.81   4  choice  quesBons   Quality 〈Criteria  of  daily  behavior〉 2.30   0.87   4  choice  quesBons     Individuality 2.68   0.89     4  choice  quesBons     Others  

14

Analysis   15

Table3 Rate  of  Purchace  of  fair  trade  goods     Sex Man Woman Total

N=1740 % 4.0   9.3   6.9  

(χ2=18.36,  df=1,  p  <.001)

Age   15~19   20~29   30~39   40~49   50~59   60~69   Total  

N=1740   %   0.9     3.1     9.6     6.1     8.0     8.7     6.9    

  Income ~400 400~599 600~799 800~1200 1200~ Total

N=1617 % 6.4   5.1   6.7   5.8   10.4   6.7  

(χ2=7.59,  df=4,  p  >.10)  

(χ2=18.79,  df=5,  p  <.01)  

16

Table4 Logis;c  Regression   Sex(ref.  Woman) Age Household  income Years  of  schooling Health  consideraBons Environmental  consideraBons 〈Public  awareness〉   PoliBcal  interest   Social  support  for  the  weak    Sacrifice  of  own  life  for  Public 〈OrientaBon  to  consumpBon〉   Lifestyle    Fashion   DifferenBaBon   Brand   Quality 〈Criteria  of  daily  behavior〉     Individuality     Others   invariable Model  χ2   Nagelkerke  R2

Coefficient   .545 * .010 .038 .107 .112 .467 **

Odds 1.725 1.010 1.039 1.113 1.119 1.595

.138 .299 -­‐.023

1.148 1.348 .978

.395 * -­‐.105 .019 -­‐.189 .323 *

1.485 .900 1.020 .828 1.381

.378 ** .027   -­‐10.898 **

1.459 1.027 .000 140.083** .221 (**p<  .01  *p<  .05)

17

Result ・ Sex  is  the  important  factor.   ・ Environmental  consideraBons  has  high  posiBve  effect.     ・ Public  awareness  is  not    so  relevant.   ・ “Lifestyle”  and  “Quality”  is  relevant.   ・ “Individuality”  is  relevant.  

18

Conclusion   19

How  can  we  understand  ethical  consumer? ・ Fair  trade  consumer  is  not  always  based  on  Public  awareness.    ⇒But  they  oriented  by  self-­‐actualizaBon  needs.     ⇒It  is  the  orientaBon  to  create  one’s  own  individual  lifestyle.   ・ This  result  doesn’t  mean  that  ethical  consumers  have  no  public   orientaBon.    ⇒ But  public  needs  and  private  needs  are  not  incompaBble.     ⇒ It  is  important  that    ethical  consumpBon  is  not  the  opposite   to  private  and  individual  concern.  

20

Reference Bauman,  Zygmunt,  2001,  The  Individualized  Society,  Cambridge:  Polity  Press.   DFID,  2009,  Elimina5ng  World  Poverty:  Building  our  Common  Future,  London:  DFID.   Elkington,  John  and  Julia  Hailes,  1989,  The  Green  Consumer  Guide:  From  Shampoo  to   Champagne:  High-­‐Street  Shopping  for  a  BeDer  Environment,  London:  V.  Gollancz.   Ingelhart,  Ronald,  1977,  The  Silent  Revolu5on:  Changing  Values  and  Poli5cal  Style  among   WesternPublics,  Prinston:  Prinston  University  Press.   JETRO(2006) “Environment  and  Health-­‐Conscious  Consumers  and  Environment  and   Health-­‐Friendly  Products  and  Services”,  JETRO  Japanese  Market  Report,  78.   Lasch,  Christopher,  1979,  The  Culture  of  Narcissism  :  American  Life  in  an  Age  of   Diminishing  Expecta5ons,  New  York:  Norton.   SenneM,  Richard,  1976,  The  Fall  of  Public  Man,  Cambridge:  Cambridge  University  Press.   Soper,  Kate,  2007  “Re-­‐thinking  the  `Good  Life’:  The  CiBzenship  Dimension  of  Consumer   DisaffecBon  with  Consumerism”,  Journal  of  Consumer  Culture,  7(2):  205-­‐229.   Trentmann,  Frank,  2007,  “CiBzenship  and  ConsumpBon,”  Journal  of  Consumer  Culture,  7:   147–158.   Watanabe,  Tatsuya,  2010,  “Fairtrade-­‐gaku(fartrade  stady)”Shin-­‐Hyoron.    

21

How Can We Understand Ethical Consumer? Yosuke ...

Health considera,ons .112. 1.119. Environmental considera,ons .467 **. 1.595. 〈Public awareness〉. Poli,cal interest .138. 1.148. Social support for the weak .299. 1.348. Sacrifice of own life for Public. -‐.023 .978. 〈Orienta,on to consump,on〉. Lifestyle .395 *. 1.485. Fashion. -‐.105 .900. Differen,a,on .019. 1.020. Brand.

413KB Sizes 0 Downloads 266 Views

Recommend Documents

Can We Talk?
words, commands, questions, emphatic statements, images, or figures of speech. Make your notes specific as you examine the passage. Personal Conversation—Genesis 15:1–8. Genesis 15 records a personal conversation between God and Abraham. Read Gen

We are here to add what we can to life, not what we can ...
Department of Information Technology. Digital Logic Design ... Draw a Nand logic diagram that implements the complement of the following function. F(A, B, C, ...

Shrinking dictators: how much economic growth can we ...
May 25, 2017 - problem of assessing the “value added” of a school teacher to standardized .... T years and is the total number sample length for country c. (2) ≡ ...... (2015), “Attribution Error in Economic Voting: Evidence from Trade Shocks

How Can We Discover the Contents of Experience?
An alternative model of introspection is a domain-specific model. On a domain-specific model, introspec- tion of visual experience is a different kind of reflection ( ...

Concussion and Speech Language Pathology: How we can help - OSLA
You do not need to hit your head directly to have a concussion AND you do not need to lose consciousness for it to be diagnosed as a concussion. Medical providers may describe a concussion as a “mild” brain injury because concussions are usually

Microblogging: What and How Can We Learn From It? - dmrussell.net
to social network sites such as Facebook, and message- exchange services like ... by the author/owner(s). CHI 2010, April 10–15, 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Microblogging: What and How Can We Learn From It?
to express using existing technologies (e.g. email, phone, IM or ... Microsoft Research New England ... more other familiar channels (e.g., email, phone, IM, or.

can we generalize.pdf
Global Environmental Politics 15:3, August 2015, doi:10.1162/GLEP_a_00316. © 2015 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1. The term “the comparative method” was emphasized by Arendt Lijphart (1971), who focused. on controlled-comparison

can we generalize.pdf
I introduce the concept of resonance groups, which provide a causeway for cross-system. generalization from single case studies. Overall the results suggest ...

Why We Must, How We Can By Janet Unruh
Mar 26, 2010 - DOWNLOAD FROM OUR ONLINE LIBRARY ... Never mind if you don't have adequate time to head to guide shop and also look for the favourite e-book to ... View a short presentation on the ideas in this book here (copy and paste this URL in yo

Things we can recycle
Page 1. Things we can recycle. © 2010 Umm An-Nu'man http://amuslimchildisborn.blogspot.com/

The Failure of Environmental Education (and How We Can Fix It)
environmental education community to take stock of itself. .... per capita economic output), and technology (specifically, ..... Science 171:1212–1217. 17. Laundré ...

PDF Online Utopia for Realists: How We Can Build the ...
at jobs we often dislike, we buy things we don t need. Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian, reminds us it needn t be this way-and in some places it isn t.Rutger.