Google Earth High Resolution Imagery Coverage (USA) As of August 9, 2005 While Goolge Earth does cover the entire globe with satellite imagery at 15m resolution, we do not have high resolution imagery for the entire globe. We have focused on larger, US metropolitan areas initially and have expanded our coverage to major international cities. We will be adding much broader coverage in high-resolution detail over the coming months. See the following charts for a comprehensive list of available high-resolution cities in the U.S. Subject to change without notice. State

Alabama

Arkansas

Area of Coverage

Imagery Date

Imagery Resolution

Birmingham

March 2002 – November 2003

1 – 2 Foot

Huntsville

March 2002

1 Foot

Montgomery

March 2002

1 Foot

Avondale

May – October 2003

2 Foot

Benson

April – September 2002

2 Foot

Casa Grande

November 2002 – September 2003

2 Foot

Chandler

April 2003 – September 2004

2 Foot

Gilbert

July 2003 – September 2004

2 Foot

Goodyear

June 2003

2 Foot

Kingman

March 2003

2 Foot

Mesa

August 2003 – September 2004

2 Foot

Phoenix (Metro)

January – December 2003

2 Foot

Prescott

June 2002 – April 2003

2 Foot

Sedona

February – June 2003 2 Foot

Tempe

April 2003

2 Foot

Tucson

October 2002

1 Foot

Little Rock

May - October 2004

2 Foot

California

Bakersfield

June 2003 – August 2004

2 Foot

Barstow

June 2002 – May 2003

2 Foot

Fresno

June 2002

1 Foot

Kern County

March 2002 – October 2 Foot 2004

Lake Tahoe

January 2003 – June 2004

Long Beach

Feb 2003 – December 2 Foot 2003

Los Angeles

March 2003

1 Foot

Modesto

March 2002

1 Foot

Monterey

March 2002 – July 2004

2 Foot

Napa/Sonoma

July 2002 – September 2004

2 Foot

Oakland

May 2002 – September 2004

2 Foot

Orange County

June 2002 – September 2004

2 Foot

Palm Springs

April 2002 – November 2004

2 Foot

Portola Valley

September 2002 – December 2004

2 Foot

Riverside County

April 2002 – September 2004

2 Foot

Sacramento Area

May 2002

1 Foot

San Bernardino County

March 2002 – November 2004

2 Foot

San Diego

November 2003

1 Foot

San Francisco

October 2002

1 Foot

San Jose

May 2002 – December 2004

2 Foot

San Luis Obispo

February 2002 – November 2004

2 Foot

Santa Barbara

September 2003

2 Foot

Santa Cruz

March – October 2003 2 Foot

2 Foot

South Lake Tahoe

April – June 2004

2 Foot

Stockton

May 2002

1 Foot

Ventura County

April 2002 – December 2004

2 Foot

Colorado Springs

2002

1 Foot

Denver

Spring 2002

1 Foot

New Haven

March 2004

2 Foot

Washington DC

Apr 2002

1 Foot

Jacksonville

December 2002

1 Foot

Miami

December 2002

1 Foot

Orlando

April 2002

1 Foot

Panama City

May 2003 – November 2004

2 Foot

Polk County

December 2002 – November 2004

2 Foot

Punta Gorda

March 2004

2 Foot

Tampa / St. Pete

February 2002 – December 2004

2 Foot

Augusta

Jun 2002 - May 2004 2 Foot

Atlanta

April 2002

Macon

January – April 2004 2 Foot

Savannah

December 2002 – December 2003

2 Foot

Honolulu

October 2002 – September 2003

2 Foot

Idaho

Boise City

April 2002 – June 2003

2 Foot

Illinois

Chicago

April 2002

1 Foot

Indiana

Indiana (entire state)

2003

1 Foot

Kansas City

September 2001

2 Foot

Overland Park

January 2003 – December 2004

2 Foot

Wichita

Nov 2002 – May 2003 2 Foot

Kentucky

Louisville

April 2002

1 Foot

Louisiana

Baton Rouge

March 2002

1 Foot

Shreveport

March 2002

1 Foot

Colorado

Georgia

1 Foot

New Orleans

January 2003 – April 2 Foot 2004

Baltimore

October 2002 – January 2003

1 Foot

Massachusetts (entire state)

2001

2 foot

Boston

2001

1 Foot

Cambridge

2003

6 inch

Worcester

April 2001

1 Foot

Detroit

April 2002

1 Foot

Jackson, MI

March 2003

1 Foot

Minneapolis

September 2002

1 Foot

Minneapolis

September 2002

1 Foot

St. Paul

December 2002 – December 2003

2 Foot

Mississippi

Jackson

March 2002

1 Foot

Missouri (the entire state)

Kansas City

September 2001

1 Foot

St. Louis

March 2002

1 Foot

Lincoln

April 2002

1 Foot

Omaha

March – May 2003

2 Foot

Pensacola

2003 - 2004

2 Foot

Carson City

July 2003

1 Foot

Las Vegas

March 2002 – May 2004

2 Foot

Reno

May 2002

1 Foot

New Mexico

Albuquerque

March 2002

1 Foot

New Jersey

New Jersey (entire state)

2002

1 Foot

New York

Albany County

Dec 2002 – Jan 2004

1 Foot

Broome County

Apr – 2002 (no DG data)

1 Foot

Cattaraugus County

Apr – 2002 (no DG data)

1 Foot

Chemung County

Apr – 2002 – Mar 2005

1 Foot

Chenango County

Apr – 2003 – May

1 Foot

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan Minneapolis Minnesota

Nebraska

Nevada

2004

North Carolina

Clinton County

Dec 2003 – Jan 2004

1 Foot

Cortland County

Jun 2004 – Jul 2004

1 Foot

Columbia County

Aug 2004

1 Foot

Erie County

Oct 2002 – Mar 2005 1 Foot

Fulton County

Apr - 2001

0.5 Foot

Genesse County

Apr - 2002

1 Foot

Greene County

Apr - 2001

1 Foot

Jefferson County

Apr - 2003

1 Foot

Livingston County

Apr – 2002 – Feb 2003

1 Foot

Monroe County

Feb 2002

1 Foot

New York City

2002 – 2004

1 Foot

Montgomery County

Apr - 2001

1 Foot

Nassau County

Jan 2002 – Nov 2003 1 Foot

Niagara County

Apr 2002 – Apr 2004 1 Foot

Oneida County

2003

1 Foot

Onondaga County

Oct 2003 – Jun 2004

1 Foot

Ontario County

Feb 2003

1 Foot

Orange County

Jan 2003 – Sept 2004 1 Foot

Orleans County

Apr - 2002

Saratoga County

Dec 2002 – Feb 2004 1 Foot

Schenectady County

Dec 2002 – Feb 2004 1 Foot

Schoharie County

Apr - 2001

1 Foot

Seneca

Jul – 2003

1 Foot

Steuben

Apr - 2002

1 Foot

Suffolk County

2003

1 Foot

Sullivan

Apr - 2001

1 Foot

Tioga

Apr - 2002

1 Foot

Warren

Apr - 2001

1 Foot

Washington

Apr - 2001

1 Foot

Westchester

2003 -2004

1 Foot

Albany County

Dec 2002 – Jan 2004

1 Foot

Charlotte (Metro basemap)

June 2004

1 Foot

1 Foot

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island South Carolina Tennessee Texas

Charlotte (Various insets)

July 2002 – April 2004

1 Foot

Raleigh-Durham

June 2002 – April 2004

2 Foot

Bismarck

Aug 2004

2 foot

Akron

Dec 2003

2 Foot

Canton

Jul – 2002

2 Foot

Cincinnati Metro

April 2004

2 Foot

Columbus Metro

Jul 2002 and June 2004

2 Foot

Cleveland Metro

June 2002

2 Foot

Youngstown

July 2002

2 Foot

Oklahoma City

Apr 2002

1 Foot

Tulsa

Aug 2002 - Sep 2003 2 Foot

Portland

May - 2002

1 Foot

Philadelphia (Metro basemap)

Nov - 2000

1 Meter

Philadelphia (Various Aug 28, 2003 insets)

2 Foot

Pittsburgh

Apr 13, 2003 - Apr 28, 2004

2 Foot

Entire State

Nov - 2000

1 Meter

Charleston

May 2002 - Jun 2004 2 Foot

Columbia

Feb - Apr 2003

2 Foot

Knoxville

Mar - 2002

1 Foot

Memphis

Jan - 2000

1 Meter

Abilene

Sep 2002 - Jul 2003

2 Foot

Amarillo

Jun 2002 - May 2004 2 Foot

Augusta

2002 - 2004

2 Foot

Austin (Greater area)

Sep - 2000

1 Meter

Austin (Downtown)

Apr - 2002

1 Foot

Dallas / Fort Worth

Sept - 2002

2 Foot

El Paso

2002

1 Foot

Houston

Oct - 2002

2 Foot

Lubbock

Jun 2002 - Feb 2004

2 Foot

Utah

Virginia

Washington

Wisconsin

Midland

Nov 2002 - Mar 2004 2 Foot

San Antonio

Jun 2002 – Nov 2004 1 Meter

Salt Lake City

Jul - 2001

2 Foot

Park City

Sep - 2001

1 Foot

Norfolk - Virginia Beach

Jul - 2001

2 Foot

Northern Virginia

Jul - 2001

2 Foot

Mount St. Helens

Oct - 2004

3 Meter

Seattle (Downtown)

Sep - 2002

1 Foot

Seattle - (Metro)

Sep - 2002

2 Foot

Spokane

Apr 2002 - Jun 2003

2 Foot

Greenbay

Nov - 2000

2 Foot

Madison

Nov - 2002

2 Foot

Milwaukee

Nov - 2002

2 Foot

Google Earth High Resolution Imagery Coverage (USA)

Aug 9, 2005 - data). 1 Foot. Cattaraugus County. Apr – 2002 (no DG data). 1 Foot ... 1 Meter. Charleston. May 2002 - Jun 2004 2 Foot. South Carolina.

98KB Sizes 29 Downloads 429 Views

Recommend Documents

Google Earth High Resolution Imagery Coverage (USA)
We have focused on larger, US metropolitan areas initially ... Entire USA coverage at 15m resolution with the following high resolution city inserts. Subject to.

High Coverage leaflet.pdf
V REVLON PROFESSIONAL®. jsme si dali výzvu: vytvořit TAKOVOU BARVU,. KTERÁ VLASY OMLAZUJE. a po které SE ŽENY MOHOU. CÍTIT ZNOVU MLADÉ.

High Coverage leaflet.pdf
V REVLON PROFESSIONAL®. jsme si dali výzvu: vytvořit TAKOVOU ... High Coverage leaflet.pdf. High Coverage leaflet.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

High Coverage leaflet.pdf
KRÁSNÉ,. V REVLON PROFESSIONAL®. jsme si dali výzvu: ... CÍTIT ZNOVU MLADÉ. Page 3 of 10. High Coverage leaflet.pdf. High Coverage leaflet.pdf. Open.

High Resolution Electromechanical Imaging of ...
Jun 16, 2006 - and Model 7280, Signal Recovery) and an external signal generation and data acquisition system. A custom- modified commercial liquid cell ...

Lightweight, High-Resolution Monitoring for ... - Semantic Scholar
large-scale production system, thereby reducing these in- termittent ... responsive services can be investigated by quantitatively analyzing ..... out. The stack traces for locks resembled the following one: c0601655 in mutex lock slowpath c0601544 i

ActionAid USA, Friends of the Earth, the Sustainable ... -
involved at adaptation planning and advocacy, particularly focused on disaster risk reduction, from the local to the international level. Date: November 15th ...

High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest ...
Nov 15, 2013 - domains, ecozones, and countries (refer to tables. S1 to S3 for all ... or more than 1% per year across all forests within the domain. ..... pixel set of cloud-free image observations which in turn was employed to calculate time-.

High-resolution saline lake sediments as enhanced tools for relating ...
(CA) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA)) have been used to point out the mineral successions of ... Lake sediment records are useful tools that have.

A High Resolution Total Variation Diminishing Scheme ...
Nov 29, 2006 - k−1, un k ,un k−1,un k−2 respectively. An easy calculation shows that ..... Mathods in App. Mech. and Eng., 19. (1979), 59-98. [2] B. P. Leonard ...

Efficient Multi-Scale Stereo of High-Resolution Planar ...
into memory would not be practical even on a modern desk- top or workstation. ..... [25] C. Strecha, W. von Hansen, L. V. Gool, P. Fua, and. U. Thoennessen.

Supervised High Resolution Dual Polarization SAR ...
In order to take into account the contextual information, the developed joint pdf ... Together, these factors explain the rapidly growing interest ..... ij) yielding.

Efficient High Resolution Relaxation Schemes For ...
Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 2000; 00:1–6. Prepared using fldauth.cls [Version: 2002/09/18 v1.01]. Efficient High Resolution Relaxation Schemes For Hyperbolic ..... aui+1 − a. 2 φ− i+1 (ui+2 − ui+1) , a < 0. Now depending on the direction of

High resolution speech feature parametrization for ...
transform of the log-subband energies, where the parameters and in (2) are .... recognition in the presence of car noise,” in ICASSP-95, vol. 1, Detroit,. MI, pp.

Supervised High Resolution Dual Polarization SAR ...
is performed by a dedicated criterion. The concept of ...... (h) VV box. (i) GT box. (j) CoDSEM-MRF box. (k) DSEM-MRF on VV box. (l) K-NN-MRF box. Fig. 1.