Erasmus+​ ​Promotion Evaluation​ ​Criteria

Applications​ ​have​ ​to​ ​comply​ ​with​ ​the​ ​following​ ​minimum​​ ​requirements​ ​in​ ​order​ ​to​ ​be considered​ ​for​ ​evaluation: ● All​ ​sections​ ​in​ ​the​ ​application​ ​form​ ​must​ ​be​ ​filled​ ​out​ ​and​ ​submitted​ ​before​ ​the deadline ● Contact​ ​person/s​ ​is/are​ ​member/s​ ​of​ ​one​ ​of​ ​the​ ​following​ ​four​ ​ESAA​ ​organizations: EMA,​ ​ESN,​ ​GaragErasmus,​ ​OCEANS​ ​Network ● Application​ ​complies​ ​with​ ​the​ ​geographical​ ​scope​ ​(see​ ​list​ ​of​ ​eligible​ ​countries​ ​in​ ​the application​ ​guideline) ● Proposed​ ​event​ ​is​ ​in​ ​line​ ​with​ ​the​ ​general​ ​objective​ ​of​ ​supporting​ ​the​ ​worldwide promotion​ ​of​ ​Erasmus+​ ​programme Applications​ ​will​ ​be​ ​assessed​ ​by​ ​the​ ​Evaluation​ ​Committee,​ ​by​ ​giving​ ​points​ ​for​ ​each of​ ​the​ ​following​ ​criteria: Note​ ​to​ ​applicants:​ ​Please​ ​note​ ​that​ ​the​ ​questions​ ​below​ ​each​ ​criteria​ ​are​ ​guiding​ ​questions and​ ​need​ ​not​​ ​be​ ​all​ ​answered​ ​in​ ​the​ ​application.

A. Aim​ ​and​ ​objectives​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​5​ ​points) a. Are​ ​the​ ​aims​ ​and​ ​objectives​ ​clearly​ ​stated​ ​in​ ​the​ ​application?​ ​(1p) b. Do​ ​the​ ​aims​ ​and​ ​objectives​ ​align​ ​with​ ​the​ ​ones​ ​listed​ ​in​ ​the​ ​application guidelines?​ ​(2p) c. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​have​ ​a​ ​specific​ ​target​ ​group?​ ​(2p) B. Impact​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​10​ ​points) a. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​actively​ ​promote​ ​ERASMUS+?​ ​(4p) b. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​have​ ​a​ ​multiplier​ ​effect?​ ​(3p) c. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​effectively​ ​reach​ ​the​ ​target​ ​group (eg.​ ​potential,​ ​outgoing/incoming,​ ​returning​ ​exchange​ ​students)?​ ​(3p) C. Collaborations​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​5​ ​points) a. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​receive​ ​support​ ​from​ ​universities,​ ​local​ ​governments,​ ​other sponsors? i. monetary​ ​(1p) ii. institutional​ ​(1p) iii. in​ ​kind​ ​(promotional)​ ​(1p) b. Does​ ​the​ ​project​ ​involve​ ​and/or​ ​reach​ ​more​ ​than​ ​one​ ​ESAA​ ​member organization?​ ​(2p) D. Budget​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​10​ ​points) a. Is​ ​there​ ​a​ ​clear​ ​outline​ ​of​ ​the​ ​budget?​ ​(1p) b. Is​ ​the​ ​budget​ ​cost​ ​efficient?​ ​(7p) c. Is​ ​alternative​ ​funding​ ​secured?​ ​⇒​ ​Yes​ ​(2p)

E. Planning​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​5​ ​points) a. Does​ ​the​ ​team​ ​have​ ​a​ ​clear​ ​and​ ​realistic​ ​implementation​ ​plan​ ​for​ ​the proposed​ ​activity/activities?​ ​(3p) b. At​ ​which​ ​planning​ ​stage​ ​is​ ​the​ ​team​ ​currently?​ ​(2p) F. Outcome​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​5​ ​points) a. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​have​ ​a​ ​clear​ ​suggested​ ​outcome​ ​that​ ​as​ ​their​ ​main​ ​objective will​ ​promote​ ​Erasmus+?​ ​(3p) b. How​ ​is​ ​the​ ​team​ ​planning​ ​to​ ​measure/prove​ ​the​ ​outcome​ ​of​ ​the​ ​event?​ ​(2p) G. Inclusion​ ​(0​ ​-​ ​3​ ​points) a. Does​ ​the​ ​event​ ​target​ ​students​ ​with​ ​special​ ​needs,​ ​from​ ​disadvantaged backgrounds​ ​or​ ​from​ ​remote​ ​areas?​ ​(3p) H. Dissemination​ ​&​ ​Communication​ ​(0-7​ ​points) a. Are​ ​the​ ​planned​ ​dissemination​ ​activities​ ​giving​ ​sufficient​ ​visibility​ ​for​ ​the​ ​scope of​ ​project​ ​and​ ​do​ ​they​ ​ensure​ ​the​ ​sufficient​ ​participation?​ ​(3p) b. Are​ ​the​ ​channels​ ​used​ ​for​ ​disseminating​ ​the​ ​project​ ​fitting​ ​for​ ​the​ ​target audience?​ ​(2p) c. Do​ ​dissemination​ ​activities​ ​ensure​ ​visibility/impact​ ​beyond​ ​the​ ​project duration?​ ​(2p) Total​ ​Maximum​ ​Points:​​ ​50​ ​PTS

Erasmus+ Promotion Evaluation Criteria

Applications have to comply with the following ​minimum​ requirements in order to be considered for evaluation: ○ All sections in the application form must be ...

206KB Sizes 4 Downloads 64 Views

Recommend Documents

An Empirical Evaluation of Test Adequacy Criteria for ...
Nov 30, 2006 - Applying data-flow and state-model adequacy criteria, .... In this diagram, a fault contributes to the count in a coverage metric's circle if a test.

ERASMUS CHARTER.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. ERASMUS CHARTER.pdf. ERASMUS CHARTER.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.Missing:

Scheduled Screening-Evaluation of Application for Promotion to ...
Nu~v:1 Ec1Ja St.. .l:fago B:rnrny, Qu~zvn City. W\VW. .... Screening-Evaluation of Application for Prom ... r II positions (Elementary and Junior High School).pdf.

ERASMUS CHARTER.pdf
Legal representative. G KALLITH02. 223481-EPP-1-2014-1-GR-EPPKA3-ECHE. -signed-. Page 1 of 1. ERASMUS CHARTER.pdf. ERASMUS CHARTER.pdf.

SPH 504 Health Promotion Planning & Evaluation Farish W2016.pdf ...
Page 3 of 20. SPH 504 Health Promotion Planning & Evaluation Farish W2016.pdf. SPH 504 Health Promotion Planning & Evaluation Farish W2016.pdf. Open.

ERASMUS GENERATION SURVEY.pdf
INTRODUCTION. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. ERASMUS GENERATION SURVEY.pdf. ERASMUS GENERATION SURVEY.pdf. Open.

ERASMUS POLICY STATEMENT.pdf
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. ERASMUS POLICY STATEMENT.pdf. ERASMUS POLICY STATEMENT.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu.

Happy life-expectancy - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
social indicators of quality-of-life differ in the criteria which they add and how many. Scheme 1 ..... There are many variations in this theme, some of which.

erasmus-plus-programme-guide_en.pdf
... with the academic world)............................................171. Page 3 of 263. erasmus-plus-programme-guide_en.pdf. erasmus-plus-programme-guide_en.pdf. Open.

Happy life-expectancy - Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Items 19 - 36 - The most current indicator of this type is the 'Human Development Index'. In ..... critics see that happen in Japan and the USA (f.e. Schor, 1991). ...... Buying power (per capita , in $). 25000. 20000. 15000. 10000. 5000. 0. H app.