Energy momentum tensor relation to Lorentz force. Peeter Joot Feb 17, 2009. Last Revision: Date : 2009/02/1807 : 14 : 45

1

Motivation.

In [Joot(b)] the energy momentum tensor was related to the Lorentz force in STA form. Work the same calculation strictly in tensor form, to develop more comfort with tensor manipulation. This should also serve as a translation aid to compare signs due to metric tensor differences in other reading.

1.1

Definitions.

The energy momentum “tensor”, really a four vector, is defined in [Doran and Lasenby(2003)] as T ( a) =

e0 ˜ e0 Fa F = − FaF 2 2

(1)

We’ve seen that the divergence of the T (γµ ) vectors generate the Lorentz force relations. Let’s expand this with respect to index lower basis vectors for use in the divergence calculation. T ( γ µ ) = ( T ( γ µ ) · γ ν ) γν

(2)

T µν = T (γµ ) · γν

(3)

So we define

and can write these four vectors in tensor form as T (γµ ) = T µν γν

1

(4)

1.2

Expanding out the tensor.

An expansion of T µν was done in [Joot(a)], but looking back that seems a peculiar way, using the four vector potential. Let’s try again in terms of F µν instead. Our field is

F=

1 µν F γµ ∧ γν 2

(5)

So our tensor components are T µν = T (γµ ) · γν

e = − 0 F λσ F αβ (γλ ∧ γσ )γµ (γα ∧ γβ )γν 8 Or

−8

1 µν T = F λσ F αβ (γλ δσ µ − γσ δλ µ )(γα δβ ν − γβ δα ν ) e0

+ F λσ F αβ (γλ ∧ γσ ∧ γµ )(γα ∧ γβ ∧ γν )

Expanding only the first term to start with F λσ F αβ (γλ δσ µ ) · (γα δβ ν ) + F λσ F αβ (γσ δλ µ ) · (γβ δα ν ) − F λσ F αβ (γλ δσ µ ) · (γβ δα ν ) − F λσ F αβ (γσ δλ µ ) · (γα δβ ν )

= F λµ F αν γλ · γα + F µσ F νβ γσ · γβ − F λµ F νβ γλ · γβ − F µσ F αν γσ · γα = ηαβ ( F λµ F αν γλ · γ β + F µσ F να γσ · γ β − F λµ F να γλ · γ β − F µσ F αν γσ · γ β ) = ηαλ F λµ F αν + ηασ F µσ F να − ηαλ F λµ F να − ηασ F µσ F αν = 2(ηαλ F λµ F αν + ηασ F µσ F να )

=

βµ αν

= 4ηαβ F F = 4F βµ Fβ ν = 4F αµ Fα ν

For the second term after a shuffle of indexes we have D E 0 F λσ Fαβ η µµ (γλ ∧ γσ ∧ γµ )(γα ∧ γ β ∧ γν )

This dot product is reducable with the identity

( a ∧ b ∧ c) · (d ∧ e ∧ f ) = ((( a ∧ b ∧ c) · d) · e) · f 2

leaving a completely antisymmetized sum 0

F λσ Fαβ η µµ (δλ ν δσ β δµ0 α − δλ ν δσ α δµ0 β − δλ β δσ ν δµ0 α + δλ α δσ ν δµ0 β + δλ β δσ α δµ0 ν − δλ α δσ β δµ0 ν ) 0

0

0

0

0

0

= F νβ Fµ0 β η µµ − F να Fαµ0 η µµ − F βν Fµ0 β η µµ + F αν Fαµ0 η µµ + F βα Fαβ η µµ δµ0 ν − F αβ Fαβ η µµ δµ0 ν 0

0

= 4F να Fµ0 α η µµ + 2F βα Fαβ η µµ δµ0 ν = 4F να F µ α + 2F βα Fαβ η µν

Combining these we have  e0  αµ ν T µν = − 4F Fα + 4F να F µ α + 2F βα Fαβ η µν 8  e0  = −4F αµ Fα ν + 4F αµ F ν α + 2F αβ Fαβ η µν 8 If by some miracle all the index manipulation worked out, we have   1 T µν = e0 F αµ F ν α + F αβ Fαβ η µν 4 1.2.1

(6)

Justifying some of the steps.

For justification of some of the index manipulations of the F tensor components it is helpful to think back to the definitions in terms of four vector potentials F = ∇∧A

= ∂ µ A ν γµ ∧ γν = ∂µ Aν γµ ∧ γν = ∂ µ A ν γ µ ∧ γν = ∂ µ A ν γµ ∧ γ ν 1 = ( ∂ µ A ν − ∂ ν A µ ) γµ ∧ γν 2 1 = (∂µ Aν − ∂ν Aµ )γµ ∧ γν 2 1 = ( ∂ µ A ν − ∂ ν A µ ) γ µ ∧ γν 2 1 = ( ∂ µ A ν − ∂ ν A µ ) γµ ∧ γ ν 2

3

So with the shorthand F µν = ∂µ Aν − ∂ν Aµ Fµν = ∂µ Aν − ∂ν Aµ Fµ ν = ∂µ Aν − ∂ν Aµ F µ ν = ∂µ Aν − ∂ν Aµ We have 1 µν F γµ ∧ γν 2 1 = Fµν γµ ∧ γν 2 1 ν µ = Fµ γ ∧ γν 2 1 = F µ ν γµ ∧ γ ν 2

F=

In particular, and perhaps not obvious without the definitions handy, the following was used above F µ ν = − Fν µ

1.3

The divergence.

What’s our divergence in tensor form? This would be

∇ · T (γµ ) = (γα ∂α ) · ( T µν γν )

So we have

∇ · T (γµ ) = ∂ν T µν Ignoring the e0 factor for now, chain rule gives us 1 (∂ν F αµ ) F ν α + F αµ (∂ν F ν α ) + (∂ν F αβ ) Fαβ η µν 2 1 αµ ν µ = (∂ν F ) F α + Fα (∂ν F να ) + (∂ν F αβ ) Fαβ η µν 2 Only this center term is recognizable in terms of current since we have

∇ · F = J/e0 c 4

(7)

Where the LHS is 

∇ · F = γα ∂α ·

1 µν F γµ ∧ γν 2



1 ∂α F µν (δα µ γν − δα ν γµ ) 2 = ∂µ F µν γν

=

So we have ∂µ F µν = ( J · γν )/e0 c

= (( J α γα ) · γν )/e0 c = J ν /e0 c Or ∂µ F µν = J ν /e0 c

(8)

So we have   1 ∇ · T (γµ ) = e0 (∂ν F αµ ) F ν α + (∂ν F αβ ) Fαβ η µν + Fα µ J α /c 2 So, to get the expected result the remaining two derivative terms must somehow cancel. How to reduce these? Let’s look at twice that 2(∂ν F αµ ) F ν α + (∂ν F αβ ) Fαβ η µν

= 2(∂ν F αµ ) Fνα + (∂µ F αβ ) Fαβ = (∂ν F αµ )( Fνα − Fαν ) + (∂µ F αβ ) Fαβ = (∂α F βµ ) Fαβ + (∂ β F µα ) Fαβ + (∂µ F αβ ) Fαβ = (∂α F βµ + ∂ β F µα + ∂µ F αβ ) Fαβ Ah, there’s the trivector term of Maxwell’s equation hiding in there. 0 = ∇∧F 

= γµ ∂ ∧ µ

1 αβ F ( γα ∧ γ β ) 2



1 µ αβ (∂ F )(γµ ∧ γα ∧ γβ ) 2  1  µ αβ = ∂ F + ∂α F βµ + ∂ β F µα (γµ ∧ γα ∧ γβ ) 3!

=

5

Since this is zero, each component of this trivector must separately equal zero, and we have ∂µ F αβ + ∂α F βµ + ∂ β F µα = 0

(9)

So, where T µν is defined by 6, the final result is ∂ν T µν = F αµ Jα /c

(10)

References [Doran and Lasenby(2003)] C. Doran and A.N. Lasenby. Geometric algebra for physicists. Cambridge University Press New York, 2003. [Joot(a)] Peeter Joot. Energy momentum tensor. ”http://sites.google.com/ site/peeterjoot/math/energy momentum tensor.pdf”, a. [Joot(b)] Peeter Joot. Lorentz force relation to the energy momentum tensor. ”http://sites.google.com/site/peeterjoot/math2009/stress energy lorentz.pdf”, b.

6

## Energy momentum tensor relation to Lorentz force. - Peeter Joot's Blog

Î½. For the second term after a shuffle of indexes we have. FÎ»ÏFÎ±Î²Î·. ÂµÂµ. ã. (Î³Î» â§ Î³Ï â§ Î³Âµ)(Î³ Î± â§ Î³ Î² â§ Î³ Î½). ã This dot product is reducable with the identity.

#### Recommend Documents

Energy momentum tensor relation to Lorentz force. - Peeter Joot's Blog
In [Joot(b)] the energy momentum tensor was related to the Lorentz force in. STA form. .... So, to get the expected result the remaining two derivative terms must.

Energy momentum tensor
In [Joot()], the electrodynamic energy density U and momentum flux density ... Additionally the energy and momentum flux densities are components of.

Peeter Joot [email protected] Velocity ... - Peeter Joot's Blog
... momentum space, and calculated the corresponding momentum space volume element. Here's that calculation. 1.2 Guts. We are working with a Hamiltonian.

Solutions to David Tong's mf1 Lagrangian problems. - Peeter Joot's Blog
dial decomposition. This is something that can be understood without the. Lagrangian formulation. To do so the missing factor is that before a conser-.

(INCOMPLETE) Geometry of Maxwell radiation ... - Peeter Joot's Blog
The first is the spatial pseudoscalar, which commutes with all vectors and bivectors. ... observe this is from the split of F into electric and magnetic field components. .... the differential operator to find eigenvectors for is the transverse gradi

questionably-the-easiest-way-to-robotic-blog-how-to-force ...
... Behind Your Blog,. Page 1 of 2. Page 2 of 2. Page 2 of 2. questionably-the-easiest-way-to-robotic-blog-how-to-force-skilful-loot-1499493545218.pdf.

Momentum, Energy and Work Test Review.pdf
What was the speed of the bullet just before it hit the block? ... pendulum bobs are small solid steel spheres. ... Momentum, Energy and Work Test Review.pdf.

Taxonomy in relation to Chromosomal morphology & Evolution ...
READING LIST: ... Below is the list of some plant families and their local name ... principles had to be adopted in naming them to avoid confusion botanists adopted ... Taxonomy in relation to Chromosomal morphology & Evolution notes 1.pdf.

Taxonomy in relation to Chromosomal morphology & Evolution ...
Taxonomy in relation to Chromosomal morphology & Evolution notes 1.pdf. Taxonomy in relation to Chromosomal morphology & Evolution notes 1.pdf. Open.