https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19980203952 2017-09-13T19:48:04+00:00Z
NASA
/ TP--1998
-208475
Electrodynamic Tether and Power Generation D.L.
Gallagher
Marshall
and L. Johnson
Space
Flight
Center,
Marshall
J. Moore SRS
Technologies,
Huntsville,
Alabama
F. Bagenal University
National
Boulder,
and
Administration
Marshall
June
of Colorado,
Aeronautics
Space
Space
1998
Propulsion at Jupiter
Flight
Center
Colorado
Space
Flight
Center,
Alabama
Available
NASA Center for AeroSpace Information 800 Elkridge Landing Road Linthicum Heights, MD 21090-2934 (301 ) 621-0390
from:
National Technical
Information
Service
5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 (703) 487-4650
TABLE
.
INTRODUCTION
.......................................................................................................................
1
.........................................................................................................................
2
2.
BACKGROUND
3.
TETHER
PHYSICS
4.
TETHER
PROPULSION
5.
JOVIAN
CAPTURE
6.
JOVIAN
ELECTRODYNAMIC
AND
.
°
9.
MANEUVERING
MISSION-SPECIFIC
7.1 7.2
Gravity Gradient Micrometeoroid
SUMMARY
AT JUPITER AND
ANALYSIS
.............................................................................................. POWER
....................................................................
............................................................................................... TETHER
CAPABILITY ISSUES
MODEL
POWER
3 11 !2
GENERATION
.....................................................................................
16
....................................................................................................
!9
Forces ....................................................................................................... Threat ........................................................................................................
19 20
.................................................................................................................................
RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES
OF CONTENTS
.............................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................
111
21 23 24
LIST
1.
Total electron and 6,000
density
with constant
OF FIGURES
density
contours
at 10, 100, 500,
1,000,
3,000,
cm -3 ..........................................................................................................................
2.
Spacecraft
speed
3.
Induced
4.
Tether current contours
5.
Force
6.
Total power
7.
Orbit
8.
Tether propulsive
9.
Tether current and voltage
during capture maneuver
10.
Orbit
capture
11.
Power
generation
12.
Effect
of tether
13.
Tether
orbital
maneuvering
capability
for changing
14.
Tether
orbital
manuevering
capability
for plane
15.
A rotating
16.
The probability
of survival
17.
Artist's
of an electrodynamic
EMF
relative
to the Jovian magnetic
4
field ..............................................................
in a 10-km tether at Jupiter .................................................................................
experienced
by the tether
developed
footprint
................................................................................................
capability power
spacecraft
with 11.009-km
during capture maneuver
tether
for 5-day
generation
and tether
bare-wire
forces
10
tether ................................
...................................................
................................................................
..................................................................................
elliptic
orbit
............................................................
apojove
change
....................................................
...........................................................
system
could
be used to maintain
for a single
strand
tether
tether-augmented
V
in near-Jovian spacecraft
tether space
tension
....................
..............................
at Jupiter
13 13 14 15
orbit ..................................................................
on polar
7 9
..........................................................................................
orbit capture
force magnitude
using
6
1, 5, 10, and 20 A .............................................................
in the tether
for Jovian
circularization
concept
for 0.1,0.5,
5
.........................
16 17 18 18 19 20 21
TECHNICAL
PUBLICATION
ELECTRODYNAMIC AND
POWER
TETHER
PROPULSION
GENERATION
AT JUPITER
1. INTRODUCTION
This report an electrodynamic The environment EDT.
the planet
velocities
which,
velocities
between
propulsive
forces
Jovian tempt generic
of a study performed
has a strong
combined
the magnetic are found
were
to evaluate
the feasibility
intended
rapid
rotation
the spacecraft.
to simulate once
a tether
tether
established
design
to demonstrate
For all cases,
is specified
and
The simulation
maneuvering
scenarios
field and the mass
with the planet's field
developed
is made to optimize
magnetic
as an input
the tether
and merits
of using
mission.
the potential is assumed
can produce orbit
and power
orbit,
close
very
high orbital large
relative
to the planet,
tether
performance
in the
generation
the use of an EDT for Jovian
and spacecraft Instead,
power
the model
of an EDT for future
to be uninsulated
and it is assumed
dictates
as high as 1 MW.
code was used to evaluate
for a specific
to the simulation
rate,
levels
propulsion
in Jovian
of the planet
In a circular
to be as high as 50 N and power
environment.
orbital
sion planning. length
when
planetary
insertion,
the results
tether (EDT) for propulsion and power generation for a spacecraft in the Jovian system. of the Jovian system has properties which are particularly favorable for utilization of an
Specifically,
Models
discusses
was exercised
engineering
and to have
that the tether
generation. studies
orbit No at-
in several and mis-
a 1-mm
diameter.
is deployed
radially.
The
2. BACKGROUND
In recent
years,
tethers
cations.
Conducting
systems.
1 Conducting
moving
wire in a magnetic
tethers
useful in any planetary closure can occur.
niques (RTG's)
have
plutonium
used
solar panels
for electrical however,
rapidly
degrade
planet,
also typically
high "wet" the strong
magnetic
power
require
specifically
generation
field,
power
generation
in all past deep
space
has improved to high levels
use of an expendable and/or
lifetime
rotation,
Stion 3 reports the tether's
in recent
Tethers
through
which
larger
tech-
generators
risk of releasing of using
Even with improvements system
tethers
of the assessment applications.
in this
are expected
system,
or around
to any
This may lead to
on orbit. It is for these reasons,
use for spacecraft
current
than that at
The possibility
maneuvering.
a
may be
and propulsion
The finite
in the Jovian
that electromagnetic
the results
through
thermoelectric
in the Jovian
for orbital
flowing
much
missions.
years.
operations
propellant
limited
missions.
on future
of radiation
Extended
radioactive
orbit appli-
and propulsion
medium.
and a plasma
magnetic
for alternative
low-Earth power
of the current
or conducting
field
is the large Jovian
of solar arrays.
address
of a plasma a magnetic
may rule out RTG's
field and rapid planetary
Stions
2
power
exposure
mass at launch
magnetosphere.
more
exists
in many
for electrical
as a result
to low solar luminosity,
environment
extended
opportunities considered
their properties
is the need
Due
for electrical
use in the Jovian 4-6
there
however,
the effectiveness
spacecraft
derive
where
to Jupiter.
into the terrestrial
technology,
are being
The first inducement
missions
been
tethers
field and in the presence
The real motivation,
for future
come to offer significant
or EDT's
system
But why Jupiter? the Earth.
have
and nonconducting
are being
from a physics
and because
of
considered
for
perspective.
3. TETHER
This stion
of the report
Jovian
planetary
Parker
and
system.
current
and resulting
Murphy
discusses
Tether
2 and power
the initial
modeling
Sanmartin.
PHYSICS
is based
3 The
estimates.
AT JUPITER
results
of analyzing
on results
computed
The Jovian
the performance
from the TSS-I
tether
magnetic
R mission
performance
of a spherically
assumptions. sumed
The
of this distance,
distance,
therefore,
field model
(1965)
coordinate
system,
are defined
axis is along
the planetary
orient
the x axis
reference
which
1 shows
and outside
linear
interpolations
varies
is accomplished with the Jovian system.
coordinate
the torus,
4 con-
on several
to the tether
will be somewhat
with the square length
is as-
volts
and
high inside
this
root of the thermal
electron
of 10 km has been
assumed,
magnetic nature
toward
with constant
profile.
Both the magnetic
point
and show
density
inside
One is the System
coordinate of Aries
constant
contours
the Io torus, Inside
level
the torus,
The torus falls off exponentially
other
the z
contours
system. of various
1,000,
and outside
the density
to
inertial
coordinate
at 10, 100, 500,
the Io torus,
where
has been made
or any
inertial
III
field and den-
system,
of this study, no effort
the first
falls off exponentially.
radial
field.
systems.
in the x-z plane of this work's
components:
the density
of a measured
also depend
current
is only a few electron
current
in two coordinate
the x and z axes
density
up of three
The results
The sond is an inertial
system
graphically
+8 Rj along
total electron
Khurana,
and an Euler potential formuof that presented by Bagenal 5
the thermal
to it. A tether
from
of
limiting
diameter.
rotates
are shown
extend
cm -3. It is made
Inside
current sensitive
maximum
is obtained
temperature
the estimated
spin axis. Due to the preliminary
of this inertial
Each of the displays quantities. Figure
of l-mm
in this coordinate
point. All results
and 6,000
Tether
of EDT performance
sity models
to estimate
radii (Rj), the electron
this distance. tether
plus an Io toms.
is used
eV. This means
it is not tremendously
with a cylindrical The analysis
which
of 5 Jovian
it is 10-50
and low outside
temperature,
distribution,
temperature,
to be 10 eV. Inside
outside
along
symmetric
electron
and the theories
represents
sisting of the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) 06 internal field model, lation for the external field. The plasma density model is a simplified version and consists
of an EDT in the
3,000,
the torus.
is derived
from
away from the magnetic
equator. Induced magnetic
tether
current
will depend
field. That speed will depend
upon the speed
on spacecraft
motion
with which around
the tether the planet,
Fj. For the purpose of initially exploring tether behavior, the spacecraft circular orbit at each radial distance and latitude where the calculations
VSC
=
moves
through
the Jovian
_sc, and planetary
motion is assumed are made:
to result
rotation, from a
(1)
3
where relative
0 is the latitude to planetary
and _ is the longitude. rotation,
given
This velocity
is added
to the velocity
of a stationary
location
by
Fj = -1.7585"
10 -4.
rcos(0)_
.
(2)
Density(cm-3) 10
i
i
I
I
I
i
i
i
I
I -5
i
i
i
i
I
i
L
i
t
i
i
i
I
i
r
i
i
I
i
I 5
i
L
L
L
5 --
.-_
0
-5
-Io -10
Figure
1. Total
i
electron
density
at 10, 100, 500,
Jupiter
is assumed
to rotate
relative
to the planetary
plotted
in figure
with a period
magnetic
2. Constant
field,
velocity
t
with constant
1,000,
3,000,
contours
density
and 6,000
of 9 hr 55 min 29.70333 Vrel, which
=
_sc
cm
10
contours -3
s. The resulting
is the sum of spacecraft
are shown
Vrel
4
I i 0 x_iS (hi)
speed
of the spacecraft
speed and planetary
rotation,
is
for 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, and 40 km/s
+ Vj
•
(3)
Relative Velocity (km/s)
10
I
_
i
I
i
l
i
f
L
I
i
i
]
I
I ,
t [
__'
i
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
1
iI
i II i
,,Ill
5 --
,,
/" 'l, ",,, I,
,,,"
'II
/
I, It
tI
.,,n 0 )4 I N
iI ,iII ,,," ,,,"
--5
-/
',, "ll
I I
I
-10
J
i
-10
I
i
L
i
i
I
-5
I
i
i
i
0
]
I
5
10
xAxis (Rj)
Figure
2. Spacecraft
You can see that for most increases
with increasing
the planetary contribute
distance.
At 90 degrees,
to induced
electromagnetic
3 shows
induced
locations, Close
rotation.
Figure
speed
relative
to the Jovian
the planetary
to the planet,
the planetary force (EMF)
EMF in the 10-km
1, and 10 kV values. Induced voltage depends netic field, Vrel, and the vector magnetic field,
upon B
rotation
the orbital
motion
magnetic
field.
dominates
spacecraft
is not a factor,
the plotted
speed
leaving
begins
speed,
to dominate
only the orbital
i.e.,
it
over
motion
to
in the tether. tether.
Contours
the tether
V = ['$;rel
x/_
are shown
length,
for-50,
[, the velocity
-10,-1,-0. relative
l, 0. l,
to the mag-
(4)
Voltage(V) 10
I
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
\
%
J j-J
\
\
/ /
.-_ 0
! ,/ /
/
/
-5
/
I,
/
"I
//
\,
/•
-1o
i
J
i
I
I
-10
/
l
i
I
I
I
-5
I
I
l
0
t
I
i
I
i
i
5
10
xAxis (Rj) Figure Tether on Parker times surface
is plotted
and Murphy,
a factor.
magnetic
current
field
2 current
The factor strength,
sity, Jo, is a function electron, e,
in figure
EMF
4. Here,
in a 10-km contours
into a conductor
is a function B. The
and the component
3. Induced
current
of the thermal
of the density,
are shown
in a magnetic
of induced
thermal
tether
voltage, density
ne, the mean
Jo -
4
1, 5, 10, and 20 A. Based
field is equal
to the thermal
of the cross-stional
along
thermal
ene VTe
for 0.1,0.5,
V; the area of the conducting
is a function
current
at Jupiter.
the magnetic
electron
velocity,
current,
surface,
Io,
a, and the
area of the conducting
field.
Thermal
current
VTe, and the charge
denof an
(5)
Current (A) 10
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
f
i
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
i
L I
I
l
i
l
[
I
i
i
J
i
--
A
.on 0
--5
--
-10 -10
I
-5
0
10
5
x Axis (Rj)
Figure The component the total thermal projected
current
onto a plane
4. Tether
current
of the current density. transverse
contours
density
The
along
for 0.1, 0.5, the magnetic
area of the conducting
to the magnetic
d is the diameter
radial
tether
of the tether
and the vector
magnetic
(0.001 field.
field is obtained
surface
is taken
by taking
to be the area
one-fourth
of
of the tether
field
a = d'l"
where
1, 5, 10, and 20 A.
sin(a)
m), l is the tether length This angle
is obtained
o_ = cos-l l _ )
(6)
,
,
( 10 4 m), and a is the angle between
the
from
(7)
where
Br is the radial component
of 2 to take into account magnetic
of the Jovian
the collection
magnetic
of current
field. The thermal
from both the parallel
current
is multiplied
and antiparallel
by a factor
directions
along
field
I,, = 2.,,-jo
found
Finally, the current is multiplied by factors to be a factor of 2-3 times greater than Parker
is the source
of the first factor. The sond factor
is thought to enhance the current in the TSS and TSS-1R missions
collection 6
(8)
of 2.5 and 30. The limiting current and Murphy 2 in the TSS and TSS-1R
results
from the analysis
by a factor
of bare tether
of at least 30 over the spherical
into a tether was missions, which
performance,
which
end-collector
used
vo,ol,s)
The 0.01,0.05, magnetic
force, 0.1,0.5,
field,
/_, a current-carrying 1,5,
tether
would
experience
10, 25, and 50 N. The force is obtained
Figure from
(9)
is shown
in figure
from the tether
length,
5, with contours l; current,
at
I'; and the
/_,
P= # x
decades current
the
6 shows
the power
1 W to l0 MW.
developed
Power
is simply
distance
of Europa
that tether performance will be limited presence of a Europa atmosphere. 7
(10)
in a current-carrying obtained
P=V.I The orbital
.
puts it beyond
from
tether. the product
Contours
are drawn
of the induced
for even
EMF
and the
. the distance
at that distance
unless
(11) treated plasma
in this report; density
however,
is enhanced
it is clear
locally
by the
Force(N) 10
5
I
I
I
I
I
i
i
i
i
I
i
i
i
i
I
I
I
1
I
-m
\
\
v
._-
d
0 --
t_
-5
m
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
-5
i
i
I
i
I
i
i
0 x Axis (aj)
Figure
5. Force
experienced
I 5
by the
tether.
i
I
I
I 10
10
f
,
i
I
I
I
I
i
i
f
Power(W) i I i
I
I
i
i
i
l
i
i
I
I
i
I
i
i
i
!
I
I
I
I
h
i
.in 0 m
--5
--
-10 -10
J
-5
I
I
0
5
xAxis (Ri) Figure
10
6. Total
power
developed
in the tether.
10
4. TETHER
The simulation trajectory
model
user-specified
developed
coupled
initial
PROPULSION
for this study
with an EDT model.
conditions,
by solving
AND
consists
MODEL
of a fifth-order,
The trajectory the two-body
d2r/dt
POWER
model
propagates
equations
2=-mr/r
3+a
3 degrees
of motion
of freedom
spacecraft
the spacecraft's
state, from
in the following
form:
t ,
(12)
where
r = spacecraft
constant
at = acceleration
caused
passed
vectors
Runge-Kutta
The tether
the motion
model
spacecraft.
The simulation
are output
at user-specified current,
are specified
algorithm
model continues
the current
the electrodynamic
tether
relative
over the user-specified as are tether
inertial
stepsize
control
state vector voltage,
to the Jovian
and used to calculate
time increments
in a Cartesian
with automatic
code passes
then calculates
of the conducting
back to the trajectory
sive forces,
forces.
At each time step, the trajectory
model.
ing from
by tether
and acceleration
uses a fifth-order
of motion. tether
vector
m = gravitational t = time
The position model
position
to integrate
current,
and force The
( 1) by dividing
time period.
system.
The
the equations
(x, y, z, Vx, Vy, Vz, t) to the
magnetosphere.
at in equation performance
coordinate
Spacecraft
parameters
vector force
by the mass
position including
result-
vector
is
of the
and velocity tether
propul-
and voltage.
11
5. JOVIAN
The tether to chemical craft.
The
simulation
propulsion mass
tionally,
used to evaluate
the feasibility
for initial
to perform
is completed.
Jovian
appealing
when
using
to be used for on-orbit
Thus, the weight
of using an EDT as an alternative
orbit insertion
is particularly
this maneuver
has the potential
maneuver
ANALYSIS
for this function
required
the tether
capture
or aerobraking
use of a tether
spacecraft
was initially
CAPTURE
(JOI)
of an interplanetary
because
of the large
conventional
maneuvering
propulsion
and/or
of the tether can be traded
power
against
space-
percentage systems.
generation
multiple
of Addi-
once the
systems
of the
spacecraft. For the purpose and mission. ments
Typical
outlined
provides
spacecraft
utilizes
missions
of 1.05 Rj and
consistent hyperbolic
launch
excess
spacecraft
from
constraint
orbit.
along
metrically
was initialized were evaluated.
orbit.
Once
drops
rapidly
at a distance approaches,
days).
force
that the tether
approaches
as the spacecraft
assumed
at Jupiter,
once
trajectory
This
report
around
The
Jupi-
first mission
utilizes
an orbit with
to be 340 kg, which would
is
be launched
the spacecraft
has a predicted
the feasibility
of capturing
Figure
the spacecraft
the planet, away
stated
during
the planet.
builds
rapidly
tether, The
trajec-
simulation
is
into the desired
maneuver
is illustrated
of time during
in
the initial flyby.
2.5 Rj from
to a peak
radially
simulation
approach
it. The
is captured
the capture
on a para-
be established
bare wire
decelerating
benefit
a retrograde
was varied
trajectory.
a
The
of the spacecraft
orbit could
is more than approximately force
to enter
on the hyperbolic
over a short period
the tether
from
center
increase,
orbit.
the maximum
length
assumptions;
that the spacecraft
by the tether
force is applied
Tether
of the spacecraft's
forces
7 shows
conditions
that the desired
the planet's
tether
to utilize
the planet.
It was found
by a 100-day
was targeted
the initial
toward
the footprint
generated
moves
to allow the spacecraft
of 6 Rj from
shows
off rapidly
the require-
orbits
that the spacecraft
used to evaluate
to the previously
the planet
propulsive
the tether
was
into a 1.05 Rj perijove
inbound
7 shows
x 106 s (100
force drops
center.
12
The
8. The figure
km (subject
Figure
was
by specifying
orbits
of 11.009
mass
The arrival
and the resulting
for 8.64
The tether
code
trajectory
diameter).
in polar Observer.
The sond mission
It was assumed
in order
The simulation
length
spacecraft
orbit directly
magnetosphere.
with the spacecraft
continued figure
transfer
of the planet's
tory. As the spacecraft elliptic
the simulation
approach
l-mm
by reviewing
Studies ''8 report.
spacecraft
in 2006. On arrival
the hyperbolic
a tether
deployed,
evaluated
and the Auroral
of 100 days.
the spacecraft
km/s.
for a polar orbit was not enforced
equatorial
begins
analysis,
regarding
Mission
involving
Observer
The
assumptions
were
Preliminary
spacecraft.
occurring
of 6.854
an Earth-Jupiter
from the rotation
using
Science
of 5 days.
some
requirements
Orbiters:
for two missions
polar orbiter
opportunity
velocity
to make
of 1.01 Rj and a period
a period
For the capture
point
planning
with the proposed
in the low energy
Polar
are the Radio
an orbit with perijove
perijove
and orbital
Close
mission
proposed
it was necessary
size
in the "Jupiter
preliminary
ter. The
of this study,
the planet's
of 107 N and then
Spacecraft Trajectory in Jovian Equatorial Plane (Capture Orbit Footprint)
_lIJlrIIIZllllllllllllIFIfflrll
14
v
LtlltJllLLlllJ0
2.10 6
4,,106 6.10 6 8,,106
x(km)
Figure
7. Orbit
footprint
for Jovian
orbit capture
with 11.009-km
bare-wire
tether.
TotalForce Reactedon SpacecraftDuring Maneuver 120
_l
I rl
I II
II
i I
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
I _
100
8O
:
/
A Z
6O O t_
40--
/
2O --
0
. m
-20 5,000
I
llllll
_llll 1.10 4
1.5°10 4
t Ill
I II
2°10 4
2.5*10 4
Time (s)
Figure
8. Tether
propulsive
force magnitude
during
capture
maneuver.
13
Tether proximately
voltage
approximately generated
6.6 MW. These tethers
by the tether
assumed
radial
possible;
in most
targeting
mission
density
during
stability
ting the spacecraft
mass
tions to the high power possible
to justify
requirement
levels
estimate
which
would
analysis
be addressed
have
would
large power
the large propulsive
of the tether, tension
probably
the system
identified.
engineered
for stability
in this
using
and power
a tether
somewhat
this possibility.
it should
be noted
power
levels
by
electron
The tether
for spin stabilization tension.
is
for orbit
the peak
to produce
However, for these
forces by the
time and reduce
the spacecraft
is
of reason-
the use of a tether
forces
at ap-
is implied
capture,
preclude
the peak
which
required
to fully investigate
and spinning
system
Additionally,
the fly-by
is required
peaks
the encounter
capabilities
of tether
to reduce
increase
voltage
during
on the physics-orbit
by designing
not been readily
of a tether
9. The
generation
the power-carrying
materials.
that based
problems
into two endmasses
the weight
for a very
indicate
Additional
probably
in figure
stabilization
It may be possible
radius
exceed
of conventional
results
scenarios.
could
levels
gravity-gradient
that engineering
the encounter.
problem
and power
preclude
perijove
are shown
at 26.5 A. The peak power
of the tether. A first-order
it seems
for a higher
the encounter
peaks
constructed
is 130 N. These
however,
capture
current
would
orientation
encounter
during
V and the current
ably sized (diameter)
fly-by
and current
290,000
by split-
Practical
solu-
that it might be
if the spacecraft
had a
supply.
3O 2.5ol05 25 20
15
= CID
10
Time (s)
Figure Some power
interesting
during
the fly-by
at a lower
the 100-day orbital
additional
produced
utilized
discharge
and power
of the capture
tether
by. The orbit can be circularized no propellant
14
required
current
and voltage
observations could
resulted
be captured
rate, an average
initial orbit period.
maneuvering
capability
9. Tether
power
It was also noted generation ( 11.009
for circularizing.
capture
from the capture
with some
capabilities
maneuver. analysis.
form of rapid
of 1,731 W could
that a tether
km ) to circularize
to a radius
during
It was noted
charge
be supplied
the spacecraft
of 1.05 Rj approximately
rate device
and then
to the spacecraft
sized for orbit capture
for use in subsequent
that, if the
orbits.
would
have
Figure
during
significant
10 shows
the
(340 kg) orbit after the initial
fly-
120 days after the initial fly-by
with
Circularization of Jovian Orbit Using Baseline Capture Tether 1'4"107Li 1,2.107
_
i II
itlJ
li
I I II
II
II
I I I I
I_
b_
8"1061E-
O_ 0
/
_"
20
40
60
80
--
100
120
Time (Days) Figure
10. Orbit
circularization
using
capture
tether.
15
6. JOVIAN
ELECTRODYNAMIC AND
The Jovian orbital
tether
maneuvering
requirements
model
once
of a mission
similar
of 180 W over the 5-day meet this requirement. generation However,
profile The
power
for use over
the entire
required
orbit would
equatorial.
the spacecraft
Observer.
radius
similar
a high charge
of the tether
of the tether
requirements
for other
in a polar
× 1-mm tether
more
power
maneuver.
manageable
peak of the
device.
shorter
could
is 140 kW. Storage Figure
11 shows
different
(<4.75
the
orbit inclina-
as the orbit inclination
that a much orbital
supply
in an impulsive
above for various
significantly
power
for the capture
in much above
rate storage
described
increases
was modeled
of this orbit result results
and
the power
a time-averaged
shown
generation
to address
that a 4.75-km
described
The figure demonstrates
power
The spacecraft
to the profiles
for this application require
for power
was sized
was sized to provide
rate for the tether
capability
capability
orbit. A tether
It was determined
period
generation
generation
generation
Science A tether
Whr/orbit).
GENERATION
the use of EDT's
Jovian
orbit and low perijove
length
power
from polar to retrograde used to meet
orbit (21,600
tether
peak
power
tions. The power
to the Radio
and 5-day period.
The elliptic
the shorter
levels.
time-averaged
in a specified
with a high rate and short
power
POWER
CAPABILITY
was also used to investigate
established
orbit with a 1.01 Rj perijove
TETHER
MANEUVERING
is varied
km) tether could
be
inclinations.
JovianTether PowerGenerationCapability '4.75-km Tether,1.01 Rj x 5-Day RetrogradeOrbit 500.103
_l i i i_ll 400-103
:-I
_
ii
i ill
i i i i II_l
I_owerGeneration/
I I_
////
Orb t/W br/ j // /--
300ol03
-_
J Equatorial
C o
Orbit
_ 200.10a
_
- Polar _ 100o103
Q.
i I I L I II i I i I I I I I I I 10 -L_i'll 8o 100 120 140 160 180 200 Inclination(deg)
Figure The sensitivity the tether
(radial)
lized it would
16
of power
with respect
be possible
to meet the spacecraft
11. Power
generation the tether
requirement
capability
for 5-day
to orbit inclination
to the planet's
to orient
power
generation
magnetic
field.
in any inertial
with a tether
elliptic
is primarily It was noted
plane desired.
much
shorter
orbit.
a function
of the orientation
that if the tether In that case,
than indicated
of
was spin stabi-
it might
be possible
by this analysis.
Typically, spacecraft.
EDT power
12 shows
of tether
tives. Figure
ing of the apojove varied
different
results
force can be desirable
the effect
used to size the power decay
generation
The propulsive
generation
radius
over
tether
power
the 100-day
with the rotation
drag force,
or undesirable
depending
generation
described
above.
period
from orbit to orbit. This is possibly
orbit passes
in a propulsive
over
affects
the motion
on the specific
forces
resulted
It was also noted
due to the inclination
of the
mission
time on the 1.01 Rj x 5-day
The tether
simulated.
which
objec-
polar
orbit
in only a slight lower-
that the amount
of apojove
of the pole and the time phasing
of
of the planet.
Effectof Tether Forceson Polar Orbit 25
20
15 ,m
re-
10
.m
5
0 0
2.10 6
4.10 6
6.10 6
8"10 6
1"10 7
Time(s)
Figure The rapid the potential the tether
rotation
high altitudes,
the simulation
results
895 kW. Figure
in the power The
peak
generation
A maximum power
the plane change
that broadens
orbit the direction
velocity
maneuvering.
14. These
study. Figure
and, conversely,
The orbital
figures
13 shows
rate generated
rate corresponding by the 4.75-km
maneuver
were generated
the rate of apojove
rate of 1.15 Rj per orbit is predicted
generation
tether
high spacecraft
more effective
velocities
for plane
changes
near perigee
in the elliptic
in a low circular
orbits
studied.
The
on the 340-kg
tether
would
from change
for the case of
to this maneuvering
rate is
spacecraft.
A maximum plane change rate of 0.041 degree per orbit is predicted. Thus, for the cases studied, that the tether is much more effective in performing in-plane orbital maneuvers. This is probably very
of
of the orbit. At
velocity.
13 and
in figures
system
on the altitude
the relative
for orbital
are illustrated
orbit.
in a posigrade
depending
field dominates the relative
on polar
of the Jovian
For example,
from the EDT can be exploited
orbit.
14 shows
properties
as 180 degrees,
dominates
of orbit inclination.
equatorial
forces
tether
generated
as a function
a retrograde
missions.
of the magnetic
velocity
generation
is one of the unique
for Jovian
velocity
resulting
of the 4.75-km
power
can vary by as much
the spacecraft
The forces
predicted
of EDT's
force
the rotational
at low altitudes,
of tether
rate of Jupiter
applications
propulsive
capabilities
12. Effect
it appears due to the
probably
be
orbit.
17
Jovian Tether Orbital Maneuvering Capability 4.75-km Tether, 1.01 Rj x 5-Day Retrograde Orbit) 1.2 b_
_l
I I t i I I ] I I I I I I I I t/I
1,0 _
Maximum Apojove
/
I I_ /
0,8 I
g _
ChangeRate (Rj)
I
/
Eqo_O_ial
0.6
O
E _ E N "_ E
Polar
0.4
0.2
a I_t
0 8O
IJl, 100
ItJ
Ill
120
II _
IIlllJll
140
160
180
200
Inclination (deg)
Figure
13. Tether
orbital
maneuvering
capability
for changing
apojove.
Jovian Tether Plane Change Capability (4.75-km Tether, 1.01 Rj × 5-Day Retrograde Orbit)
0.04
-£
m
0.03
= = = r.-
\
Orbit
.E=
_
0.02
_= =E
--
l
e___e Maximum Plane I Change Rate (deg
\
-
._E O.Ol E=
Equatorial Orbit-_
OI I I I J I, 80
100
J h
\ \
_ _ I J i J I J i_--.,_l
120
140
160
J
180
200
Inclination(deg)
Figure
18
14. Tether
orbital
maneuvering
capability
for plane
change.
7. MISSION-SPECIFIC
7.1 In order dous forces
to maintain
experienced
tion must be used. be attained Jupiter,
One
such forces
approach
after deployment. integral
part of the design
science
measurements
option
This approach in two places
using
Figure
would
a rotating in figure
also increase
simultaneously,
15. A rotating
would
spacecraft
Forces to keep
it vertical
mechanism sufficient
and endmass
other to keep
under
the potentially
than gravity the tether
weights.
Due
tremen-
gradient
stabiliza-
vertical
and stable
can
to the mass
distribution
of
too weak. vertical
would
be to reevaluate expanding tether
system
and tether
scope
rotation return
because
could
to rigidize
approach,
making
of a mission
spacecraft.
keeps
and spatially-varying
system
a stiffener
mission
and two small
science
time-varying
be to include
the entire
the science
15. The system's
the potential
providing
some forces
lengths
the tether
and potentially
like that illustrated
gradient
tether
are simply
to keeping
Another
sufficient
near Jupiter,
gravity,
modest
Gradient
in the tether
by operation
In Earth-orbit
with relatively
however,
something
tension
Gravity
ISSUES
to include
Such
the tether measurements
a system
from
could
tether
an
multipoint might
developing
time-coordinated
be used to maintain
the tether the tether
look slack.
now be made observations.
tension.
19
7.2
The threat all tethers
operating
of severing in Earth
the tether orbit.
Micrometeoroid
by collision
With an impactor
Threat
with a micrometeoroid of one-third
is very real, as is the case with
the tether
cut, the probability of survival for tethers of 1- and 10-mm diameter diameters of one-third and one-fifth the tether diameter were assessed.
diameter
is shown
assumed
in figure
16.
JovianTetherExamples
P
m ¢o
a.
Time (yr)
Figure
20
16. The probability
of survival
for a single
strand
tether
in near-Jovian
space.
to cause Impactor
a
8. SUMMARY
The use of EDT's in the Jovian system, as shown in the artist's concept (fig. 17)' presents entirely new challenges and opportunities. In a circular orbit near the planet, it appears that induced tether voltages can reach as high as 50,000 V, currents can become greater than 20 A, power levels can reach over a million watts, and propulsive forces can reach higher than 50 N. Utilizing this tremendous power is clearly beyond current engineering capabilities.
Figure 17. Artist's concept of an electrodynamic tether-augmented spacecraft at Jupiter. EDT's appear, on the basis of plasma physics, to be feasible for use in the Jovian magnetosphere. They also appear to present significant engineering challenges including: High levels of tether current mean that managing a spacecraft system's thermal budget is not simple. The complex geometry of forces that a tether would experience around Jupiter means that sophisticated control of tether current will be required in order to achieve specific mission orbital characteristics. The capture analysis illustrates the potential for reasonably sized tethers to generate significant propulsive forces and tremendous, megawatt-level power generation. The huge power levels predicted for the capture maneuver would require a relatively heavy tether system to handle the load. However, the weight of such a system could be justified for missions with very large power requirements.
22
•
It alsoappearsfeasiblethatvery shorttethers(- 1km) couldbeutilized for generatingsubstantial power andorbital maneuveringcapabilities.Powergenerationvia tethermay provide a realisticalternativeto RTG's.
•
The issueof tetherstabilityremainsopen.Gravity gradientforcesat Jupiterareinsufficientto maintain tetherorientationandtensionunderthesepropulsiveloads.Alternative configurations, includinga rotatingsystem,shouldbeconsidered.
•
Additional analysesshouldbe performedto evaluatethe behaviorof a tethersystemin lower altitude,morecircularorbits.In thesetypesof orbitsit wouldbepossibleto providecontinuous power andpropulsiveforceswithout the requirementto deal with the very largepeaklevels generatedin highly elliptic orbits.
9.
Based and power
•
•
on the study performed
generation
A more
A rotating
system
with two spacecraft
Power
•
This should
both the tether management
A detailed
and the power dynamic
namic
environment
Better
physics
integrated
using
and merits
of EDT
mission-specific
coordinated
be examined
an EDT for propulsion
are as follows:
performance
for propulsion
and power
requirements.
by a small-to-modest with the science
and the enhanced
should
of using
recommendations
connected
be closely
engineering options
system,
characterization
be performed
the tether •
and detailed
should
mize
the feasibility
in the Jovian
generation
investigated.
•
to evaluate
for a spacecraft
specific
RECOMMENDATIONS
science
length investigation
tether
should
be
team
to opti-
the limits
of both
return.
in more detail
to determine
system.
simulation
should
be developed
to thoroughly
understand
the unique
dy-
at Jupiter.
models
describing
the plasma
environment
at Jupiter
should
be obtained
and
into the simulations.
23
REFERENCES
I°
Johnson,
L., et al.: "Electrodynamic
craft Propulsion,"
AIAA-96-4250,
ville, AL, September 2.
3.
L.W.;
Journal
of Geophysical
5.
F.: "Empirical
Shiah,
and Power,
Kliore,
Spilker,
A.J.; Galileo
Potential
Model
Models
Hinson, Radio
T.: "Jupiter Meeting
Space
and Space-
Conference,
Hunts-
Polar
Summary,
Wire Anodes
Satellite,"
for Electrodynamic
Teth-
1993.
Magnetospheric
Field,"
Journal
of Geophysical
Torus:
EM.;
Voyager
Measurements,"
Journal
of Geophysi-
1994. N.H.:
"Three-Dimensional
Sci., Vol. 45, pp. 475-482,
Occultations,"
Ionospheric
1967.
E.: "Bare
of Jupiter's
of the Io Plasma
D.P.; Flasar,
Close
and Technologies
Station
1997.
K.S.; Wu, S.T.; and Stone,
Planet.
Space
of an Electron-Emitting
Vol. 9, pp. 353-360,
Vol. 99, pp. 11043-11062,
A.; Hwang,
Program
Buildup
M.; and Ahedo,
Vol. 102, pp. 11295-11306,
Bagenal,
Space
of the International
Vol. 72, pp. 1631-1636,
K.K.:
ing Group
24
Research,
Research,
From 8.
"Potential
Khurana,
tion in Space," 7.
1996 AIAA
B.L.:
of Propulsion
cal Research, 6.
and Murphy,
"Euler
for Reboost
1996.
J.R.; Martinez-Sanchez,
ers," Journal 4.
24-26,
Parker,
Sanmartin,
Tethers
Nagy,
Science,
A.E;
Orbiters:
Preliminary 26, 1995.
of Current
Collec-
1997. and Cravens,
Vol. 277, pp. 355-358,
September
Simulation
Mission
T.E.: "The
Ionosphere
of Europa
1977.
Studies,"
Outer
Planets
Science
Work-
REPORT
DOCUMENTATION
PAGE
FormApp,'oved OMBNo.0704-0188
Pubhc reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Informalion Operation and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Prolect (0704-0188), Washington. DC 20503 1. AGENCY
USE ONLY
(Leave
Blank)
2. REPORT
DATE
3. REPORT
June 1998 4. TITLE
AND
TYPE
Technical
SUBTITLE
Electrodynamic
AND
DATES
COVERED
Publication 5. FUNDING
Tether Propulsion
and Power Generation
NUMBERS
at Jupiter
6. AUTHORS
D.L. Gallagher, 7. PERFORMING
L. Johnson,
ORGANIZATION
J. Moore,*
NAMES(S)
AND
and F. Bagenal** 8. PERFORMING
ADDRESS(ES)
REPORT
George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center 35812
ORGANIZATION
NUMBER
M-876
9.SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) ANDADDRESS(ES) National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546-0001
10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER
NASA/TP--
! 998-208475
11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Prepared by Program Development Directorate *SRS Technologies, **University of Colorado 12a.
DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY
STATEMENT
12b.
DISTRIBUTION
CODE
Unclassified-Unlimited Subject Category 20 Standard Distribution 13.
ABSTRACT
(Maximum
200 words)
The results of a study performed to evaluate the feasibility and merits of using an electrodynamic tether for propulsion and power generation for a spacecraft in the Jovian system are presented. The environment of the Jovian system has properties which are particularly favorable for utilization of an electrodynamic tether. Specifically, the planet has a strong magnetic field and the mass of the planet dictates high orbital velocities which, when combined with the planet's rapid rotation rate, can produce very large relative velocities between the magnetic field and the spacecraft. In a circular orbit close to the planet, tether propulsive forces are found to be as high as 50 N and power levels as high as i MW.
14.
SUBJECT
TERMS
tethers, electrodynamic in-space transportation 17.
SECURITY
CLASSIFICATION
OF REPORT
Unclassified NSN 7540-01-280-5500
15. NUMBER
propulsion,
OF PAGES
32
orbit transfer, power generation, 16. PRICE
CODE
A03 18. SECURITY
CLASSIFICATION
OF THIS PAGE
Unclassified
t9.
SECURITY
CLASSIFICATION
20.
LIMITATION
OF ABSTRACT
OF ABSTRACT
Unclassified
Unlimited Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89) Prescribedby ANSIStd 239-18 298-102