Case No.2014/17 11.04.18 Today, this Court is also working as Link MM of Ld. MM, Ms. Mahima Rai. Present :
Petitioner in person alongwith Ld. Counsels, Sh. Debopriya Pal and
Sh. Kunal Kumar. It is stated by the Ld. Counsels for the petitioner that vide order dated 13.02.18, this court allowed the petitioner to serve the summons upon the respondent no.1 namely Sunny Choudhary through whatsapp, text messages and email. Ld. Counsels for the petitioner submit that respondent no.1 has been duly served through Whatsapp and also through Text Message on his Mobile Number through the mobile number of the petitioner. They further submit that summons have also been served upon the respondent no.1 on the email Id i.e. [email protected]
through the email Id of the petitioner i.e. [email protected]
Petitioner submits that the mobile number and email (as mentioned in the affidavit), on which respondent no.1 has been served, belongs to the respondent no.1. She has filed an affidavit of compliance in pursuant to the order dated 13.02.18 alongwith some documents on record. Submissions heard. Record perused. Perusal of copy of documents which are filed on record reveals “Double Tick” on the printout of the Whatsapp messages, which primafacie shows that the copy of the summons has been delivered on the mobile number of the respondent no.1. However, none has appeared on behalf of the respondent no.1. At this stage, it is stated by the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner challenged the order dated 15.07.17 vide which only respondent no.1
was summoned and Ld. Counsel for all the respondents i.e. including respondent no.1 appeared before the Ld. Revisionist Court, therefore, respondent no.1 is very well aware about his summoning in the present matter. Today, no adverse order is being passed against the respondent, in the larger interest of justice. Put up for further proceedings on 04.05.18.
(Surabhi Sharma Vats) MM/Mahila Court01/East/KKD/Delhi 11.04.18