Department of Transportation Year-End FY2017 Performance Evaluation (October 2017)

Strategic Policy Initiatives The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has identified several Strategic Policy Initiatives (SPIs) for fiscal year 2016-17 and beyond. For this performance evaluation, the Department has updated progress on initiatives from its Fiscal Year 2017 Performance Plan that capture the Department’s strategic and operational priorities. The updates reflect data available in spring 2017. Additional details on these initiatives are available in the Department’s Performance Plan, which may be accessed here. SPI 1 Safety: Move Colorado toward zero deaths by reducing traffic-related deaths by one-half by 2030. This includes reducing fatalities by 12 per year, from 548 in 2008 to 344 in 2025. CDOT aims to reduce fatalities to 440 for its one-year target (Dec. 31, 2017 target, or calendar year 2017 fatalities) and 416 for its three-year target (Dec. 31, 2019 target, or calendar year 2019 fatalities). SPI 2 Pavement Condition: Attain High or Moderate Drivability Life for 80 percent of sampled lane miles of pavement on the state highway system by 2025. CDOT plans to achieve 79 percent1 High/Moderate Drivability Life for its one-year target (June 30, 2017 target, or fiscal year 2017 pavement condition), down from 80 percent in fiscal year 2016. The three-year target is 69 percent (June 30, 2019 target, or fiscal year 2019 pavement condition). SPI 3 Travel-Time Reliability: Slow the growth of congestion and achieve satisfactory travel-time reliability on Interstate 25 in the Front Range and in the Interstate 70 West Mountain Corridor. One- and three-year goals include: • • • •

Reduce the Planning Time Index Achieve a PTI of 2.70 in 2019. Reduce the Planning Time Index Achieve a PTI of 2.90 in 2019. Reduce the Planning Time Index Achieve a PTI of 1.80 in 2019. Reduce the Planning Time Index Maintain a PTI of 1.80 in 2019.

for Northbound Interstate 25 from a projected average of 2.57 in calendar year 2017 to an actual average of 2.50. for Southbound Interstate 25 from a projected average of 2.73 in calendar year 2017 to an actual average of 2.70. for Westbound Interstate 70 from a projected average of 1.71 in calendar year 2017 to an actual average of 1.70. for Eastbound Interstate 70 from a projected average of 1.82 in calendar year 2017 to an actual average of 1.80.

SPI 4 Maintenance: Maintain CDOT’s roadways and facilities to minimize the need for replacement or rehabilitation in a constrained funding environment. This includes achieving an overall Maintenance Levels of Service (MLOS) grade of C+ for the state highway system in fiscal year 2017 and a C for fiscal year 2019, compared to an actual grade of C+ in fiscal year 20162.

1 2

The pavement targets for fiscal years 2017 and 2019 were updated in April 2017 to reflect new pavement condition information and new forecasts. The overall Maintenance Levels of Service grade for fiscal year 2016 was revised to a C+ in late calendar year 2016.

1

Department of Transportation Year-End FY2017 Performance Evaluation (October 2017)

Operational Measures SPI 1—Safety: Move Colorado toward zero deaths by reducing traffic-related deaths by one-half by 2030. This includes reducing fatalities by 12 per year, from 548 in 2008 to 344 in 2025. CDOT aims to reduce fatalities to 440 for its one-year target (Dec. 31, 2017 target, or calendar year 2017 fatalities) and to 416 for its three-year target (Dec. 31, 2019 target, or calendar year 2019 fatalities). Major Functional Area – Safety Process – CDOT implements a variety of processes to mitigate injuries and fatalities on Colorado’s roadways. For example, the Department qualifies, selects, advertises and awards Highway Safety Improvement Program projects. Projects that are selected address identified crash patterns, which are mitigated by the scope of the project and meet a minimum benefit/cost ratio of 1.0. CDOT’s goal is to meet a program-wide benefit/cost ratio of 2.0.

Measure

CY14 Actual

CY15 Actual

CY16 Actual

Q1 CY17

Q2 CY17

Q3 CY17

CY17 Goal

CY19 Goal

Outcome: Fatalities on Colorado Roadways. Outcome: Fatalities per 100 million Vehicle Miles Traveled on Colorado roadways. Lead Metric 1: Average benefit/cost ratio for Highway Safety Improvement Program projects. Lead Metric 2: Dedicated law enforcement contact hours for traffic safety enforcement. Lead Metric 3: Percentage of advertised FASTER Safety projects that address Level of Safety Service 3 and 4 locations.

488

547 (rev.)

608 (rev.)

109

263

457

440

416

0.996

1.09 (rev.)

N/A3

N/A3

N/A3

N/A4

0.92

0.88

N/A

2.98

2.85

2.19

2.51

2.58

Mini-mum 2.0

Mini-mum 2.0

75,689

84,146

119,762

24,663

52,633 (rev.)

73,826

66,750

92,000

N/A

75%

86%

86%

92%

92%

90%

90%

FY14 Actual

FY15 Actual

FY16 Actual

Q1 FY17

Q2 FY17

Q3 FY17

Q4 FY17

FY17 Goal

FY19 Goal

84%

159%

160%

30%

61%

81%

113% (YTD)

100%

100%

Measure Lead Metric 4: FASTER Safety Mitigation program dollars spent as a percentage of the program's fiscal-year allocation5

Note: Fatalities and injuries statistics are subject to frequent revision as new data become available. These data were current as of early July 2017

3

Official 2016 Vehicle Miles Traveled data will not be available until mid-2017, and 2017 data will be unavailable until mid-2018. Official 2016 Vehicle Miles Traveled data will not be available until mid-2017, and 2017 data will be unavailable until mid-2018. 5 Metric compares program dollars spent during the specified time period to current year's allocation. The dollars spent may be revenue accumulated in any year. 4

2

Department of Transportation Year-End FY2017 Performance Evaluation (October 2017)

SPI 2—Pavement Condition: Attain High or Moderate Drivability Life for 80 percent of sampled lane miles of pavement on the state highway system by 2025. CDOT plans to achieve 79 percent High/Moderate Drivability Life for its one-year target (June 30, 2017 target, or fiscal year 2017 pavement condition), down from 80 percent in fiscal year 2016. The three-year target is 69 percent (June 30, 2019 target, or fiscal year 2019 pavement condition). Major Functional Area – Various, including Capital Construction; Operations and Maintenance; Safety; and Program and Project Support Process – Operational processes related to pavement condition include preserving, resurfacing, and rehabilitating roads with the optimized application of cost-effective pavement treatments.

Measure Outcome: Percentage of sampled lane miles of state highway pavement with High or Moderate Drivability Life. Lead Metric: Percentage of Surface Treatment program projects advertised for the fiscal year that match recommendations from CDOT's pavement management system.

FY14 Actual

FY15 Actual

FY16 Actual

Q1 FY17

Q2 FY17

Q3 FY17

Q4 FY17

FY17 Goal

FY19 Goal

73%

79%

80%

Annual Metric

Annual Metric

Annual Metric

Annual Metric6

79% (rev.)

69% (rev.)

N/A

77%

90%

57% (Fiscal YTD)

80% (Fiscal YTD)

90% (Fiscal YTD)

89% (Fiscal YTD)

80%

80%

SPI 3—Travel-Time Reliability: Slow the growth of congestion and achieve satisfactory travel-time reliability on Interstate 25 in the Front Range and in the Interstate 70 West Mountain Corridor. (See specific targets in chart below.) Major Functional Area – Operations and Maintenance Process – Various processes will be used to achieve this goal, such as improving incident management and training first responders.

Measure Outcome A: Average monthly Planning Time Index value on Northbound Interstate 257 Lead Measure 1: Average incident clearance time on NB I-25.

6 7

CY14 Actual

CY15 Actual

CY16 Actual

2.42

2.47

2.45

51 minutes

51 minutes

53 minutes

Q1 CY17 Actual Jan.: 2.65 Feb.: 2.49 March: 2.42 Jan.: 23 minutes Feb.: 23 minutes March: 32 minutes

Data will be available in late November 2017 due to a change in the vendor who collects the pavement condition data. Termini for Interstate 25 metrics are C- 470 and E-470. Results and goals are for daytime and early evening weekday hours.

3

Q2 CY17 Actual April: 2.5 May: 2.69 June: 2.65 April: 35 minutes May: 43 minutes June: 39 minutes

CY17 Goal

CY19 Goal

2.50

2.70

46 minutes

41 minutes

Department of Transportation Year-End FY2017 Performance Evaluation (October 2017)

Measure Lead Measure 2: Average monthly road closure time on NB I-25. Outcome B: Average monthly Planning Time Index value on Southbound Interstate 255 Lead Measure 1: Average incident clearance time on SB I-25. Lead Measure 2: Average monthly road closure time on SB I-25. Outcome C: Average monthly Planning Time Index value on Eastbound Interstate 708 Lead Measure 1: Average incident clearance time on EB I-70. Lead Measure 2: Average monthly road closure time on EB I-70. Outcome D: Average monthly Planning Time Index value on Westbound Interstate 706 Lead Measure 1: Average incident clearance time on WB I-70. Lead Measure 2: Average monthly road closure time on WB I-70.

CY14 Actual

CY15 Actual

CY16 Actual

61 minutes

50 minutes

51 minutes

2.41

2.62

2.29

49 minutes

44 minutes

49 minutes

58 minutes

47 minutes

49 minutes

2.13

1.78

1.64

49 minutes

74 minutes

52 minutes

278 minutes

124 minutes

75 minutes

1.76

1.45

1.54

45 minutes

71 minutes

64 minutes

166 minutes

163 minutes

92 minutes

Q1 CY17 Actual Jan.: 32 minutes Feb.: 50 minutes March: 20 minutes Jan.: 2.35 Feb.: 2.21 March: 2.00 Jan.: 25 minutes Feb.: 21 minutes March: 23 minutes Jan.: 33 minutes Feb.: 33 minutes March: 42 minutes Jan.: 1.07 (rev.) Feb.: 1.05 (rev.) March: 1.13 (rev.) Jan.: 31 minutes Feb.: 30 minutes March: 18 minutes Jan.: 55 min. (rev.) Feb.: 55 min. March: 49 min. (rev.) Jan.: 1.08 (rev.) Feb.: 1.05 (rev.) March: 1.39 (rev.) Jan.: 36 minutes Feb.: 32 minutes March: 41 minutes Jan.: 48 minutes Feb.: 61 minutes March: 25 minutes

Q2 CY17 Actual April: 41 minutes May: 50 minutes June: 41 minutes April: 2.27 May: 2.41 June: 2.51 April: 29 minutes May: 34 minutes June: 34 minutes April: 35 minutes May: 43 minutes June: 39 minutes April: 1.41 (rev.) May: 1.16 (rev.) June: 1.19 April: 32 minutes May: 38 minutes June: 107 minutes April: 32 minutes May: 39 minutes June: 51 minutes April: 1.4 May: 1.28 June: 1.49 April: 18 minutes May: 54 minutes June: 85 minutes April: 44 minutes May: 45 minutes June: 128 minutes

CY17 Goal

CY19 Goal

45 minutes

40 minutes

2.70

2.90

40 minutes

35 minutes

42 minutes

38 minutes

1.80

1.80

67 minutes

59 minutes

112 minutes

99 minutes

1.70

1.80

64 minutes

57 minutes

147 minutes

130 minutes

NOTE: CDOT has revised the presentation of the metrics above to reflect performance for individual months, rather than year-to-date performance 5

Termini for Interstate 25 metrics are C- 470 and E-470. Results and goals are for daytime and early evening weekday hours. Termini for Interstate 70 metrics are Vail and C-470. Results and goals are for daytime and early evening weekend hours.

8

4

Department of Transportation Year-End FY2017 Performance Evaluation (October 2017)

SPI 4—Maintenance: Maintain CDOT’s roadways and facilities to minimize the need for replacement or rehabilitation in a constrained funding environment. This includes achieving an overall Maintenance Levels of Service (MLOS) grade of C+ for the state highway system in fiscal year 2017 and a C for fiscal year 2019, compared to an actual grade of C+ in fiscal year 2016. Major Functional Area – Operations and Maintenance Process – Under nine Maintenance Program Areas, CDOT performs many processes to maintain the state highway system. For example, the Roadway Surface area includes sealing potholes and blading unpaved surfaces. The Structure Maintenance area includes painting bridges, repairing expansion joints and patching bridge decks. The Snow and Ice Control area includes plowing snow and taking avalanche control measures.

Measure

FY14 Actual

FY15 Actual

FY16 Actual

Outcome: Overall Maintenance Levels of Service Grade.

B-

B-

C+ (rev.)

Lead Measure 1: Snow and Ice Control Grade.

B

B

B-

Lead Measure 2: Retro-reflectivity score for sampled long-line striping.11

9

N/A

April: 14612 May: 173 June: 166

July: 161 Aug.: 176 Sept.: 223 Oct.: 195 Nov.: 178 Dec.: 135 Jan.: 128 Feb.: 96 March: 155 April: 159 May: 135 (rev.) June: 131

Q1 FY17

Q2 FY17

Q3 FY17

Q4 FY17

Annual Metric Annual Metric

Annual Metric Annual Metric

Annual Metric Annual Metric

Annual Metric9 Annual Metric10

July: 144 Aug: 144 Sept: 161

Oct.: 181 Nov.: 193 Dec.: 202

Jan.: 135 Feb.: 112 March: 138

Apr.: 152 May: 169 June: 201

FY17 Goal

FY19 Goal

C+

C

B

B

≥80 mcd/m² /lux13

≥80 mcd/m²/lux

FY17 grade not yet available due to issues with new system that calculates the overall grade.

10

FY17 grade not yet available due to issues with new system that calculates the overall grade. Aggregate numbers do not include yellow striping for Region 3. February 2016 results do not include Region 5. Data since June 2016 do not include Region 1. December 2016 data do not include white striping in Region 3 12 First month of reporting with current methodology. 13 CDOT's goal is to achieve, at minimum, a retro-reflectivity score for longitudinal pavement markings of 80 mcd/m²/lux (millicandelas per square meter per lux), a measure of luminous intensity. Properly implemented and maintained longitudinal pavement markings convey directional information, location of the road center and edges, the presence of passing or nopassing zones, and an indication that a driver is occupying the correct lane. 11

5

CDOT Performance Plan Annual Performance Evaluation 2017 ...

84% 159% 160% 30% 61% 81%. 113%. (YTD) 100% 100%. Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... CDOT Performance Plan Annual Performance Evaluation 2017- FINAL.pdf. CDOT Performance Plan Annual Performance Evaluation 2017- ...

155KB Sizes 0 Downloads 390 Views

Recommend Documents

CDOT Performance Plan Annual Performance Evaluation 2017 ...
48 minutes Feb.: 61 minutes March: 25 minutes April: 44 minutes May: 45 minutes June: 128 minutes 147 minutes 130 minutes. Page 4 of 5. CDOT Performance Plan Annual Performance Evaluation 2017- FINAL.pdf. CDOT Performance Plan Annual Performance Eval

CDOT Performance Evaluation_July 071015.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading this page. Retrying... CDOT Performance Evaluation_July 071015.pdf. CDOT Performance Evaluation_July 071015.pdf.

TEACHER PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Apr 12, 2016 - Principals are required to complete teacher evaluations in keeping with ... Certification of Teachers Regulation 3/99 (Amended A.R. 206/2001).

Annual performance appraisal.PDF
(Arvind Kumar). Executive Director Estt. Grl) ... Annual performance appraisal.PDF. Annual performance appraisal.PDF. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In.

Annual performance appraisal.PDF
Retrying... Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download ... Annual performance appraisal.PDF. Annual performance appraisal.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AND ...
As uplinks of most access networks of Internet Service Provider (ISP) are ..... event, the TCP sender enters a slow start phase to set the congestion window to. 8 ...

FY 2017-18 DNR Performance Plan - November 2017.pdf ...
recreation. ○ State Parks - ​Maintain accessible, affordable, and diverse outdoor recreation opportunities. and promote natural resource education. ○ Minerals & Energy - ​Promote responsible and sustainable development of Colorado's energy. a

FY 2017-18 DNR Performance Plan - November 2017.pdf ...
There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. FY 2017-18 DNR Performance Plan - November 2017.pdf. FY 2017-18 DNR Performance Plan - November 2017.pdf. Op

10th Annual Intel IT Performance Report - Media11
usage models like cloud computing and consumerization. In 2010, Intel IT made significant contributions to Intel·s business results, from increasing supply chain ...

District Performance Plan 2016 -2017-2.pdf
Action Step. (please only list one action step per box). Resources and Amount Needed for. Implementation. (people, time, materials, funding sources). List Artifacts/Evidence of Progress: Information (Data) that will verify the. action step is in prog

FPGA Implementation Cost & Performance Evaluation ...
IEEE 802.11 standard does not provide technology or implementation, but introduces ... wireless protocol for both ad-hoc and client/server networks. The users' ...

Performance Evaluation of Equalization Techniques under ... - IJRIT
IJRIT International Journal of Research in Information Technology, Volume 2, Issue ... Introduction of wireless and 3G mobile technology has made it possible to ...

2016 Annual Performance Report SMCSC.pdf
Whoops! There was a problem loading more pages. Whoops! There was a problem previewing this document. Retrying... Download. Connect more apps... Try one of the apps below to open or edit this item. 2016 Annual Performance Report SMCSC.pdf. 2016 Annua

2016 Annual Performance Report SMCSC.pdf
Education. 9.2 12.4 8.4 14.3. Percent of Instruction Delivered Through. Career and Technical Education. 4.2 4 4.1 5.6. Number of Students Receiving Free or.

2015 Annual Performance Report.pdf
Greencastle Community Sch Corp. 2015 Annual Performance Report. Page 3 of 7. 2015 Annual Performance Report.pdf. 2015 Annual Performance Report.pdf.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF CURLED TEXTLINE ... - CiteSeerX
2German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI), Kaiserslautern, Germany ... Curled textline segmentation is an active research field in camera-based ...

Exploratory PerFormance Evaluation using dynamic ...
plete 'active' sub-models that serve, e.g., as embedded strategies that control the .... faces, their signature, and that these interfaces behave as described above ...

Performance Evaluation of Equalization Techniques under ... - IJRIT
IJRIT International Journal of Research in Information Technology, Volume 2, Issue ... Introduction of wireless and 3G mobile technology has made it possible to ...

Performance Evaluation for Widely Linear ...
WL processing offers a significant performance advantage with a moderate ... IN wireless networks, fading caused by the multi-path signal propagation and ...

Performance Evaluation of Parallel Opportunistic Multihop ... - CiteSeerX
of the IEEE International Conference on Communications, Seattle,. WA, pp. 331-335 ... From August 2008 to April 2009, he was with Lumicomm Inc.,. Daejeon ...

Performance Evaluation of Parallel Opportunistic ...
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Dankook University, 152 ... Second, computer simulations are performed to verify the performance of the ...

Performance Evaluation of Curled Textlines ... - Semantic Scholar
[email protected]. Thomas M. Breuel. Technical University of. Kaiserslautern, Germany [email protected]. ABSTRACT. Curled textlines segmentation ...

Performance evaluation of QoS routing algorithms - Computer ...
led researchers, service providers and network operators to seriously consider quality of service policies. Several models were proposed to provide QoS in IP ...