USO0RE40449E

(19) United States (12) Reissued Patent

(10) Patent Number:

Provitola et a]. (54)

(76)

US RE40,449 E

(45) Date of Reissued Patent:

Aug. 5, 2008

AUTO-VERIFYING VOTING SYSTEM AND

2003/0062411 A1

4/2003 Chung et a1.

VOTING METHOD

2003/0068872 A1 *

4/2003

McClure et a1. ............. .. 235/51

2004/0046021 A1 *

3/2004

Chung ...................... .. 235/386

Inventors: Anthony I. Provitola, PO. Box 2855,

DeLand, FL (US) 32721-2855; Michael R. McDermott, PO. Box 2855, DeLand, FL (US) 32721-2855

OTHER PUBLICATIONS Rebecca Mercuri, “A Better Ballot Box?,” IEEE Spectrum, vol. 39, No. 10, Oct. 2002, U. S. A.

Rebecca Mercuri, “Voting Automation (Early and Often?),” Inside Risks, Communications of the Association for Com

(21) Appl.No.: 11/062,351 (22) Filed:

puting Machinery, vol. 43, No. 11, Nov. 2000, U. S. A.

Feb. 14, 2005

Rebecca Mercuri, “Corrupted Polling,” Inside Risks, Com munications of the Association for Computing Machinery, vol. 36, No. 11, Nov. 1993, U. S.A. Rebecca Mercuri, “Electronic Voting”, (from WWW.notable

(Under 37 CFR 1.47) Related US. Patent Documents

softWare.com copyrighted 200042005), Updated Sep. 2005,

Reissue of:

(64) Patent No.: Issued: Appl. No.:

6,769,613 Aug. 3, 2004 09/732,324

Filed:

Dec. 7, 2000

(51)

(52) (58)

Int. Cl. G06K 17/00 G06F 11/00

U. S. A.

Rebecca Mercuri, “The Business of Elections,” 3rd Confer ence on Computers, Freedom and Privacy, Mar. 1993, U. S. A.

Rebecca Mercuri, “VotingiMachine Risks,” Inside Risks, Communications of the Association for Computing Machin ery, vol. 35, No. 11, Nov. 1992, U. S.A.

(2006.01) (2006.01)

(Continued) Primary ExamineriSteven S. Paik

US. Cl. ........................... .. 235/386; 235/51; 705/12 Field of Classi?cation Search .................. .. 235/50,

Assistant ExamineriApril A Taylor

235/51, 56, 57,375,386; 705/12 See application ?le for complete search history.

(57)

ABSTRACT

A voting system provides for a computer-prepared and (56)

References Cited

computer-printed election ballot generated by input from the

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

voter, and provides for auto-veri?cation whereby the voter has the opportunity and the responsibility to inspect the

4,641,240 A

12/1996 Harp

6,081,793 6,250,548 6,581,824 6,641,033

6/2000 6/2001 6/2003 11/2003

A B1 B1 B2

7,036,730 B2 *

computer-printed ballot With his or her votes. The voting system also provides for correction of the votes of the voter in the computer station and correction of the votes of the

2/1987 Boram

5,585,612 A

Challener McClure McClure Lohry et a1.

voter shoWn on the printed ballot if such votes are not shoWn

5/2006

Chung ...................... .. 235/386 Balolia

2002/0066780 A1 *

6/2002

2002/0078358 A1 *

6/2002 Neffet a1. .

2002/0084325 A1 2002/0084352 A1 2003/0006282 A1

7/2002

Reardon

.... .. 235/51

713/176

................... .. 235/386

on the printed ballot as intended by the voter. Ultimately, the voter is presented With a printed ballot prepared by the vot ing station and its connected printer Which accurately pre sents the votes of the voter for submission by the voter for ?nal tabulation.

7/ 2002 Reardon 1/2003 Vedura et a1.

94 Claims, 3 Drawing Sheets

Voting Station (vs)1

US RE40,449 E Page 2

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

Michael Stanton (Translator), Agéncia O Estado de Sao

Paulo, “The Importance of Recounting Votes”, (on Website

Rebecca Mercuri, “Statement on Electronic Voting”, (from WWW.notablesoftWare.com), Copyright 2001, U. S. A.

http://WWW.estadao.com.br/technologia/), Nov. 2000, Bra

Rebecca T. Mercuri, “Physical Veri?ability of Computer Systems, ”5th International Computer Virus and Security

Zil.

Conference, Mar. 1992, U. S. A.

Ted Selker and Sharon Cohen, Caltech/Mit Voting Technol ogy Project, “An Active Approach to Voting Veri?cation”, VIP Working Paper #28, May 2005, U. S. A. Rebecca Mercuri, “Electronic Vote Tabulation Checks & Balances”, Ph.D. Dissertation Defense, University of Penn sylvania, Oct. 2000, U. S. A.

United States of America 108th Congress, 1st Session, H. R. 2239, A Bill, “Voter Con?dence and Increased Accessibility Act of 2003”, Section 4. * cited by examiner

US. Patent

Aug. 5,2008

US RE40,449 E

Sheet 1 0f 3

Voting Station (VS) 1

Ballot

Scanning Machine

(Opti anal) Input Device 3 Keyboard,

etc.

Computer (C) 2

Display Device

Voting 23

Visual or

Program

FIG. 1

Auditory

US. Patent

Aug. 5, 2008

Sheet 2 of3

l (C) 2

US RE40,449 E

83:35:13 Machine Ballot Validation

(V S)1 (c) 2 Master Computer Final Storage of Votes

(vs)1 (C) 2

Machiti?

Tabula '

(VS)1 (C) 2

Vote Counting

FIG. 2

US. Patent

Aug. 5, 2008

Sheet 3 of3

US RE40,449 E

Votcr Input to Voting

Program

10

Painting

Braille

of Ballot

PE‘Pb‘J-MI ‘gt. l1

l2

Voter Inspection of Votes Shown

Destruction of U1;

on Printed Ballot

_ ..

_,

Voted Ballot

13

18

Ballot

Unacceptable

Scanning 14

table

Unacceptable

Unacceptable .

Ballot

for

Scanning

8rd Tamils?”

Acceptable

17 1‘

FIG. 3

Tabuhn'on and

Storage 0f V 0a Pnntcd 1°

US RE40,449 E 1

2

AUTO-VERIFYING VOTING SYSTEM AND VOTING METHOD

or she votes shows the votes as he or she intended. The

voting system also provides for correction of the votes of the voter by the voter if the election ballot produced by a com

Matter enclosed in heavy brackets [ ] appears in the original patent but forms no part of this reissue speci?ca

puter voting station from his or her voting input does not 01

another printed ballot. The present invention provides a voter with a printed ballot prepared by a computer voting station with a printer from input by the voter which accu rately presents the votes of the voter in a familiar form, and

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

which the voter than submits as his or her votes.

Not Applicable

The present invention employs a computer voting station which is a computer to which a display, an input device, and a printer are connected, and which is running a computer

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

program for directing the voting process for the voter and for vote counting. A ballot scanning machine which is capable of reading ballot selection markings, such as the ?lled-circle,

Not Applicable REFERENCE TO MICROFICHE APPENDIX

Not Applicable

?lled-oval, or ?lled-rectangle types of voting markings, may also be connected to the voting station. The computer pro 20

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

gram for the voting system displays the ballot for voting together with instructions for voting and provides for input of votes by the voter. The voter votes by selecting his or her preference in candidates or issue positions by means of an

Current mechanical and electronic voting systems that do not involve physical alteration of ballot material by the voter do not provide for voter veri?cation of the correctness of his or her own vote. Current voting systems that do involve physical alteration of ballot material by the voter to effect

show the votes as he or she intended, such correction being

effected by repeating the voting process and producing

tion; matter printed in italics indicates the additions made by reissue.

input device recognized by the computer program, and the 25

computer program temporarily stores such vote information in memory or on storage media. A printed ballot produced by the computer voting station which shows the votes of a voter is then presented to the voter and either compared by the voter, or by operation of the computer program for the

the voter occurs, the mechanical or electronic means for 30

may be rejected or the counting otherwise rendered inaccu

voting system with a ballot scanning machine, the machine capable of reading ballot selections, with the votes of the voter temporarily stored in the computer. The result of the

rate or suspect. The circumstance of ballot rejection or inconsistent mechanical tabulation in the case of erroneous

the voter, in the case of comparison by the voter, or by the

voting are subject to erroneous or incompetent handling by the voter. When such erroneous or incompetent handling by counting the votes on the ballot are affected, and the ballot

comparison is then judged acceptable or unaccceptable by

or incompetent handling by the voter often requires manual examination of ballots, which is not only laborious and sub ject to its own inaccuracies, but is also inherently fraught with dif?culty in maintaining the integrity of the election process. The principal object of the present invention is to

35

provide a voter with a printed ballot prepared by a computer

40

computer program for the voting system using the ballot scanning machine so that only printed ballots which show votes by the voter identical to the votes of the voter stored in

the computer voting station will be accepted for ?nal tabula tion. Such ?nal tabulation is then made by a tabulation

machine for the precinct.

station and printer from input by the voter which completely BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

and accurately presents the votes of the voter, and which is in a familiar form for easy review of his or her vote by the voter, so that machine and human error may be detected and

corrected before the ballot is ?nally submitted by the voter

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a voting station used in the 45

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an example of a voting sys

for tabulation with the votes of other voters. There is no prior art that this invention builds upon except

tem con?guration of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram of the relation between the steps of the

its generic relationship to the well-known concept of elec tronic and mechanical voting machines, including those which produce a permanent paper record in addition to direct electronic and mechanical tabulation. However, there does not appear to be any prior art which combines accurate electronic or mechanical preparation of a printed ballot with an opportunity for review of the ballot by the voter and mechanical or electronic comparison of the printed ballot with the data stored from the voter input. The present invention has elements that may be consid

ered to be covered generally by class 235, particularly sub class 51 covering machines employed for casting and count ing votes.

voting method using the voting system of the present inven 50

tion. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

55

The present invention is a voting system which provides for auto-veri?cation, auto -veri?cation meaning here the pro cess by which the voter has the opportunity and the respon sibility to verify that the printed ballot which he or she ?nally presents as his or her votes shows the votes he or she

intended. The voting system also provides for correction of 60

his or her vote if the printed ballot by which he or she voted is not as he or she intended, such a correction being effected

by repeating the operation of the voting station in the voting process. Although the voting system which is the present

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is a voting system and method which provides for auto-veri?cation, auto-veri?cation mean ing here the process by which the voter has the opportunity and the responsibility to verify that the ballot with which he

voting system of the present invention.

invention is complete as the instrument by which an election

process may be carried out, the voting process is ultimately 65

founded upon the law which governs elections and the man

ner in which the voting system is managed and operated. Thus, there may be many variations in the process that will

US RE40,449 E 3

4

be effective and equivalent in the management and operation of the voting system Which is the present invention that Will

2a for the voting system With a ballot scanning machine 6, the machine capable of reading ballot selection markings, or by both methods, With the votes of the voter temporarily stored in the computer 2. The vote stored in the computer 2 is

produce an accurate count of votes Which have been indi

vidually veri?ed by the voters themselves. The principle object of the present invention is to provide

either in memory or on disk, also by operation of the com

puter program 2a for the voting system running in the com puter 2. The result of the comparison is then judged accept able or unacceptable by the voter, in the case of comparison by the voter, or by the computer program 2a for the voting system, in the case of comparison With the ballot as read by the ballot scanning machine 6 in the voting station 1, Which is the preferred embodiment, so that only printed ballots

a voter With a printed ballot prepared by a voting station With

a printer from input from the voter Which accurately presents the vote of the voter, and Which is in a familiar form for easy revieW by the voter, so that machine and human error may be

detected and corrected before the ballot is submitted by the voter for tabulation With the votes of the other voters.

The present invention is a voting system and method Which, referring to FIG. 1, employs a computer voting sta

4, input device 3, and printer 5 are connected. The computer

Which shoW votes by the voter identical to the votes of the voter stored in the computer 2 for the voting station 1 Will be accepted for ?nal tabulation 19, as shoWn in the schematic

2 may be a mainframe, a central computer With terminals, a standard personal computer, or a combination thereof. Such computers may be linked by local area netWorks 20, or net

referring to FIG. 3 such a comparison may also be made visually or in braille 13 by the voter, Without the use of a

Works linking several locations, or intemet, With various

ballot scanning machine 6, resulting in a determination by the voter 15 of the acceptability of the printed ballot With the

tion 1 Which includes a computer 2 to Which a display device

types of direct connection, such as digital or acoustical

illustration of the voting method in FIG. 3. HoWever, again

20

votes of the voter for ?nal tabulation 19. Such ?nal tabula tion 19 may then be made by a tabulation machine 9 for the

telephonic, ?breoptic, satellite, or microWave. Such comput ers 2 may have internal memory, such as mainframes and

personal computers, or may be terminals, With or Without memory independent of the memory of the computer to Which they are the operating interface. Such computers 2 may have data storage devices, such as ?xed disk drives, or

precinct (or other legally chosen voting subdivision) Which, in a preferred embodiment, is one Which has the same ballot 25

scanning machine mechanism as the ballot scanning machine 6 Which scanned the printed paper ballot for com

removably media drives, such as ?oppy drives, optical

parison 14 With the vote temporarily stored in the voting

drives, bemoulli drives, or magnetic hard disk drives, all of

station 1 computer 2 memory. The computer program 2a for the voting system may be running in a master computer 7 of Which the voting stations 1 are terminals, or locally stored in each computer 2 for a

Which may be internal or external to the computer 2, depend

ing on the hardWare con?gurations selected. The display

30

devices 4 referred to may include standard visual displays,

such as computer cathode ray tube monitors, TFT displays,

plasma displays, and liquid crystal displays, and auditory displays, such as speakers and earphones, connected to sound Wave generating interfaces in the computer. The input

35

voting station, Which may be a stand-alone computer 2, depending on the hardWare con?guration chosen to imple ment the voting system. The computer program 2a by Which the voting system is operated, running in the computer 2 for

device 3 may include a keyboard, standard or braille for

a voting station 1, functions to cause the computer 2 for a

vision impaired voters, a pointing device, such as a computer

voting station 1 to display voting information and instruc

mouse or trackball, a touchscreen, joysticks, or buttons such

tions to the voter, as Well as instructions and information as

as on a video game controller.

In the example of the auto-verifying voting system sche matically shoWn in FIG. 2, the system operates through indi vidual voting stations 1 that include individual computers 2,

40

such as personal computers, or terminals for a central computer, or a combination thereof, to each of Which is con

nected a printer 5 With graphics capability. The preferred

45

embodiment of the voting system Would use a laser printer With a minimum resolution of 600 by 600 dots per inch, and Which is capable of printing a paper ballot on Which the selection of votes can be represented by ?lled-circles or other ballot selection markings, such as ?lled-ovals or ?lled

50

rectangles. Such a paper ballot should closely resemble the ballots normally published in advance of an election to inform the electorate of their choices and to create familiar ity With the layout of the ballot. Also connected to the com puter 2 in the voting station 1 may be a machine 6 Which is

55

to the operation of the voting system. Such voting instruc tions may be presented by the program 2a visually or audibly, With various options for languages other than English for selection by the voter, and may include practical and legal Warnings about voting and the abuse of the voting right. The type of display device 4, visual or auditory, as Would be necessary for voters Whose sight Was impaired, may be selected by the vector before commencing the opera tion of the voting station 1 by program 2a selection or by prior arrangement With election of?cials. Such a selection may be implemented by directing the voter to a voting sta

tion 1 speci?cally equipped for the selection, or by an opin ion available in the computer program 2a in appropriately con?gured computer 2 voting stations 1. The computer program 2a also displays the ballot for vot ing and provides for input of votes by the voter, the type of display device 4 again being selected in advance of com

capable of reading ballot selection markings previously

mencing operation of the voting station. Again referring to

described, either directly, through a master computer 7, or netWork 20 to Which the computer 2 for the voting station 1

electro-optical sensing device from the Well-knoWn art. Such

FIG. 3, the voting method proceeds as the voter votes 10 by selecting his or her preference in candidates or issue posi tions by means of the input device 3 provided and recog niZed by the computer program 2a, and the computer pro gram 2a temporarily stores such voting information in

a ballot scanning machine 6 may be interfaced With the com

memory or on storage media. The computer program 2a may

puter 2 in the voting station 1 to scan the paper ballot printed by the printer 5 as voted by the voter. The printed ballot

provide for revieW and correction of votes during the opera tion of the voting station 1 by the vector. Upon or folloWing temporary storage of the vote of the voter by the computer program 2a in the computer 2 for the voting station 1, the vote of the voter is then presented to the

is connected. Such a machine Will hereinafter be referred to as a “ballot scanning machine” 6 and is essentially an

produced by the computer voting station 1 Which shoWs the votes of a voter presented to the voter may either be com

pared by the voter, or by operation of the computer program

60

65

US RE40,449 E 5

6

voter in the form of a paper ballot 11, 12 printed by the

dates or on the issue positions, database recording of the

printer 5 for that voting station 1, the paper ballot being produced by the printer 5 in the printing process by the com

anonymous voting of each voter, real time read-out of voting information, and continuous comparison With the results of the vote counting by the tabulating machine 9 for the voting precinct. All of the voting activity of the computers 2 the voting stations 1, and the tabulations 19 by the voting pre

puter program 2a from the information concerning the vote of the voter stored in memory, such vote being represented on the printed ballot by ?lled-circles or other ballot selection markings related to the choices of the voter made upon vot

cinct (or other legally chosen voting subdivision) may be

ing. The printed ballot may be produced by the printer 5 by printing the votes of the voter on a pre-printed election

recorded for later revieW. Such voting activity may also be monitored in real-time, so that if discrepancies appear

ballot, or by printing the votes of the voter concurrently With

betWeen the tabulation of the votes cast as shoWn from the

the printing of the election ballot on the same paper as the

totals available from the computer program 2a for the voting stations 1 and the tabulation 19 of the votes cast by the

election ballot is printed. The printed ballot may be embossed in braille directly by a braille printer for reading

tabulating machine 9 of the precinct, (or other legally chosen voting subdivision) those discrepancies may be brought to

and veri?cation by a sight-impaired voter 12, or translated and overprinted With the use of a machine using Well-knoWn

the attention of election of?cials, present to or removed from

technology for character recognition and braille printing.

the precinct (or other legally chosen voting subdivision).

The voter then has an opportunity to examine the printed ballot for correctness With regard to the preferences expressed by his or her voting 13. If upon inspection of the

printed ballot produced by the printer 5 for the voting station 1 used by the voter 13, the voter observes that the printed ballot correctly represents the votes of the voter 15, the bal lot may be submitted by the voter 16 for processing to a ballot scanning machine 6 interfaced With that voting station 17. Such processing may proceed in the computer program

What We claim as our invention is:

1. A self-verifying voting system comprising: 20

computer to display general voting instructions, at least one election ballot shoWing the candidates and issues to be voted on, and directions to the voter for 25

2a by comparison of the votes represented by ballot selection markings on the printed ballot With the votes stored in the computer 2 for the voting station 1. If the votes shoWn on the printed ballot are identical to the votes stored in the com

puter 2 for the voting station 1, the ballot is returned to the voter for presentation by the voter 16 for ?nal tabulation 19

tabulation machines 9 for the precinct require for acceptance

operation of the system; present the election ballot for voting and input of votes by the voter; accept input of the votes from the voter; print out the election ballot according to Which the voter voted With the votes of the voter printed

30

thereon, so that the votes of the voter are readable

on said election ballot by the voter and readable by

by one of the tabulating machines 9 for the voting precinct (or other legally chosen voting subdivision), and the vote data Which Was temporarily stored in the voting station 1 computer 2 is ?nally stored 19 for processing by the com puter program 2a. A ballot scanning machine 6 may also be programmed through the computer 2 for the voting station 1 to imprint the printed ballot With a validation marking or code Which the

one or more voting stations comprising: (a) one or more computer programs Which operate in a

a tabulating machine; 35

record the votes in the computer; and compare the votes read by a ballot scanning machine With the votes recorded in the computer; (b) a computer With at least one display device, at least one device to accept voting input from a voter, at least one data storage device, and su?icient memory

to provide for the operation of said computer pro 40

gram in Which said computer program runs;

of the printed ballot for tabulation. If the votes of the voter as shoWn on the printed ballot are not identical to the votes of

(c) a printer connected to said computer for printing the election ballot according to Which the voter voted;

the voter stored in the computer for the voting station 1 computer 2, the printed ballot presented to the voter may then be invalidated 14, 17, Which may be evidenced by

(d) a ballot scanning means for reading the votes on the

printed ballot printed according to the election ballot 45

printed ballot are compared by the computer pro

defacement or other treatment of the ballot, and the ballot may either be returned to the voter for reference, or destroyed 18. Such a ballot scanning machine 6 Would in a preferred embodiment render such an invalidated ballot

unacceptable by the tabulation machine 9 for the precinct, so

gram With the votes recorded in the computer for the

voter; 50

that the votes on such an invalidated ballot could not be

(e) means for connecting said ballot scanning means to said computer; and

a means for tabulating the printed ballots generated by

accepted as ?nal votes for tabulation 19 With other votes.

The vote information temporarily stored in the voting station 1 computer 2 Would then be erased, and not stored for further processing With other ?nal votes stored in the computer 2 for

Which the voter voted so that the votes shoWn on the

said one or more voting stations.

2. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the computer is a

standard personal computer. 55

3. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the display

the voting station 1. Upon the occurrence of such an invali

device is a visual display device.

dation of a printed ballot the voting system Would become subject to diagnostic revieW to determine the cause of the discrepancy, Which may require the temporary closure of the

4. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the display device is an auditory display device [such as a sound card] With speakers or earphones. 5. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the computer is a

system. If the hardWare con?guration permits, only the vot ing station 1 involved Which produced the discrepancy

60

[standard personal] central computer with terminals.

Would be shut doWn for diagnostic revieW, With the voter being directed to another voting station 1 to repeat the voting process. The processing of the individual votes of the voters may

include continuous tabulation 19 by inclusion of the vote of the voter in the total of votes cast in selection of the candi

65

6. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the computer is a standard personal computer Which is connected to a local area netWork Within the voting precinct. 7. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the election bal lot presented is displayed in increments of each candidate or issue to be decided upon.

US RE40,449 E 8

7 8. The voting system of claim 1 wherein the computer holds the recorded votes in memory until comparison of the printed ballot as read by [the] a tabulating machine With the

accept input of the votes from the voter; print out the election ballot according to Which the voter voted With the votes of the voter printed

votes recorded in memory con?rms that such votes are iden

thereon, so that the votes of the voter are readable

tical.

on said election ballot by the voter and readable by a tabulating machine;

9. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the computer

record the votes in the computer; and compare the votes read by a ballot scanning machine With the votes recorded in the computer; (b) a computer With at least one display device, at least one input device, at least one data storage device, and

program causes the votes to be recorded on said data storage

device of the computer. 10. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein one of said at least one input device is a pointing device. 11. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein one of said at least one input device is a keyboard. 12. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein one of said at

suf?cient memory to provide for the operation of said computer program in Which said computer pro

least one input device is a touch-screen. 13. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein one of said at least one of the data storage devices is a ?xed disk. 14. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein one of said at least one of the data storage devices is removable media.

gram runs; (c) at least one computer terminal With at least one display device, and at least one device to accept vot

ing input from a voter connected to said computer; (d) a printer connected to said computer terminal for printing the election ballot according to Which the voter voted;

15. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the [printer is a

laser printer] printed ballot closely resembles the ballot pub

20

lished in advance ofthe election. 16. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the [computer station, at least one display device, and at least one input device, and the printer are in one machine case] the printed ballot has the same appearance as the ballot published in

(e) a ballot scanning means for reading the votes on the

printed ballot printed according to the election ballot Which the voter voted so that the votes shoWn on the

printed ballot are compared by the computer pro gram With the votes recorded in the computer for the

25

advance ofthe election. 17. The voting system of claim 1 further comprising at least one master tabulating machine for the precinct Which reads the election ballot according to Which the voter voted With printed indication of the votes of the voter printed

voter; (f) means for connecting said ballot scanning means to said computer; and

a means for tabulating the printed ballots generated by

thereon for tabulation of the voters votes.

26. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the computer is a standard personal computer. 27. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the display

18. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the master tabu lating machine is connected to a master netWork for the

political subdivision conducting the vote. 19. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a voter

device is a visual display device. 35

veri?ed ballot as validated.

20. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a printed ballot as valid for counting by the means for tabulat

said one or more voting stations.

30

40

28. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the display device is an auditory display device [such as a sound card] With speakers or earphones. 29. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the computer is a [standard personal] central computer with terminals. 30. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the computer

ing the printed ballots.

is a standard personal computer Which is connected to a local

21. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a voter

area netWork Within [the] a voting precinct. 31. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the election ballot presented is displayed in increments of each candidate

veri?ed ballot as invalidated.

22. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a printed ballot as invalid for counting by the means for tabu

45

32. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the computer holds the recorded votes in memory until comparison of the printed ballot as read by the tabulating machine With the

lating the printed ballots. 23. The voting system of claim 1 Wherein the means for tabulating the printed ballots generated by said one or more

votes recorded in memory con?rms that such votes are iden 50

voting stations Will accept only printed ballots Which are validated by a ballot scanning machine. 24. The voting system of claim 1 further comprising a braille printer for embossing a printed ballot With a braille translation of the election ballot and the votes of the voter so that said printed balloon and the votes of the voter are read

33. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the computer

55

25. A self-verifying voting system comprising: 60

computer to

display general voting instructions, at least one elec tion ballot shoWing the candidates and issues to be voted on, and directions to the voter for operation

of the system; present the election ballot for voting and input of votes by the voter;

tical. program causes the votes to be recorded on said data storage

able in braille. one or more voting stations comprising: (a) one or more computer programs Which operate in a

or issue to be decided upon.

65

device of the computer. 34. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein one of said at least one input devices is a [graphical cursor] pointing device. 35. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein one of said at least one input devices is a keyboard. 36. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein one of said at least one input devices is a touch-screen. 37. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein one of said at least one of the data storage devices is a ?xed disk. 38. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein one of said at least one of the data storage devices is removable media.

39. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the [printer is a

laser printer] printed ballot closely resembles the ballot pub lished in advance ofthe election.

US RE40,449 E 9

10

40. The voting system of claim 25 wherein the computer [station], at least one display device, and at least one input

55. The method of voting of claim 49 further comprising the comparison by the computer for the voting station of the votes of the voter temporarily stored in the computer for the

device, and the printer are in one machine case.

41. The voting system of claim 25 further comprising at least one master tabulating machine for the precinct Which reads the election ballot according to Which the voter voted With printed indication of the votes of the voter printed

voting station With the votes of the voter shoWn on the

printed ballot Which have been read to the computer by a

ballot scanning machine. 56. A self-veri?ting voting system comprising:

thereon for tabulation of the voters votes.

one or more voting stations comprising: (a) one or more computerprograms which operate in a

42. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein [the] a master tabulating machine is connected to a master netWork for the

computer to display general voting instructions, at

political subdivision conducting the vote.

least one election ballot showing the candidates and/

43. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a voter

or issues to be voted on, and directions to the voter

veri?ed ballot as validated.

for operation of the system;

44. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a printed ballot as valid for counting by the means for tabulat

accept input of the votes from the voter;

present the election ballot for voting and input of votes by the voter; print out the election ballot according to which the voter voted with the votes of the voter printed

ing the printed ballots. 45. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a voter veri?ed ballot as invalidated.

by a ballot scanning machine; and

46. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped With a means for marking a printed ballot as invalid for counting by the means for tabu

record the votes in the computer; (b) at least one computer with at least one display device, at least one device to accept voting input

lating the printed ballots. 47. The voting system of claim 25 Wherein the means for tabulating the printed ballots generated by said one or more

25

the election according to which the voter voted; (d) a ballot scanning machinefor reading the votes on

braille printer for embossing a printed ballot With a braille

the printed ballot printed according to the election

translation of the election ballot and the votes of the voter so that said printed ballot and the votes of the voter are readable

ballot which the voter voted and

a means for tabulating the printed ballots generated by

in braille.

election ballot, temporarily store the votes of the voter; (b) printing of the votes of the voter from the votes tempo

rarily stored in the computer for the voting station; (c) comparison by the voter of the printed votes With the votes temporarily stored in the computer for the voting

said one or more voting stations.

57. The voting system of claim 56 wherein said at least 35

one computer has at least one data storage device.

58. The voting system of claim 57 wherein said at least one data storage device is connected to said at least one

computer through at least one terminal connected to said at least one computer. 40

59. The voting system of claim 56 wherein said at least one device to accept voting input from a voter is connected to said at least one computer through at least one terminal connected to said at least one computer

60. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the ballot scan 45

station; (d) decision by the voter as to Whether [the] a printed ballot is acceptable or unacceptable;

(e) inputting of information as to the acceptability of [the] a printed ballot by the voter; and

from a voter, and su?icient memory to provide for the

operation of said computer program; (c) a printer connected to said computer for printing

voting stations Will accept only printed ballots Which are validated by a ballot scanning machine. 48. The voting system of claim 25 further comprising a

49. A method of voting providing for self-veri?cation of [the] a ballot comprising the steps of: (a) voting by a vector using a computer voting station programmed to present an election ballot, accept input of votes from the vector according to the

thereon, so that the votes of the voter are readable on said election ballot by the voter and readable

20

ning machine is connected to a voting station so that the votes shown on the printed ballot are compared by the com

puter program with the votes recorded in the computer for the voter.

(f) submission of [acceptable ballots] an acceptable

6]. The voting system of claim 60 wherein said one or more computer programs compares the votes read by the ballot scanning machine with the votes recorded on the com

printed ballot for tabulation. 50. The method of voting of claim 49 further comprising

puter. 62. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the computer is

50

destruction of ballots Which are unacceptable.

51. The method of voting of claim 49 Wherein the printing

a standard personal computer 55

63. The voting system of claim 56 wherein the display device is a visual display device.

of the votes of the voter is on a pre-printed election ballot[;].

52. The method of voting of claim 49 Wherein the printing

64. The voting system of claim 56 wherein the display

of the votes of the voter is concurrent With the printing of [the election] a ballot [and on the same paper as the election

device is an auditory display device with speakers or ear

ballot is printed:] which closely resembles the ballot pub

phones. 60

65. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the computer is

lished in advance ofthe election. 53. The method of voting of claim 49 further comprising

a central computer with terminals.

the tabulation of the votes of the voter With the other votes

a standard personal computer which is connected to a local area network within a voting precinct.

cast in [the] a voting precinct. 54. The method of voting of claim 49 further comprising

66. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the computer is

[the] a ?nal storage of the votes stored in the computer for

67. The voting system of claim 56 wherein the election ballot presented is displayed in increments of each candi

the voting station for further processing.

date or issue to be decided upon.

65

US RE40,449 E 11

12

68. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the computer

86. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85further comprising

holds the recorded votes in memory until comparison ofthe printed ballot as read by a tabulating machine with the votes recorded in memory confirms that such votes are identical.

inputting ofinformation as to the acceptability oftheprinted ballot by the voter prior to submission of acceptable ballots

for tabulation. 87. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85further comprising

69. The voting system of claim 56 wherein the computer program causes the votes to be recorded on a data storage

destruction of ballots which are unacceptable.

device of the computer

88. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85 wherein theprinting

70. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein one ofsaid at least one input devices is apointing device. 7]. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein one ofsaid at

of the votes of the voter is on a pre-printed election ballot.

least one input devices is a keyboard.

election ballot and on the same paper as the election ballot

89. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85 wherein theprinting ofthe votes ofthe voter is concurrent with theprinting ofthe

72. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein one ofsaid at

is printer 90. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85further comprising a

least one input devices device is a touch-screen.

73. The voting system of claim 56further comprising at

tabulation of the votes of the voter with the other votes cast

least one data storage device.

in the votingprecinct. 9]. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85further comprising a final storage of the votes stored in the computer for the vot

74. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein a data storage device is a?xed disk or removable media.

75. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the printer is a

ing station for further processing. 92. The method ofvoting ofclaim 85further comprising the comparison by the computerfor the voting station ofthe

laser printer 76. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the computer, at least one display device, and at least one input device, and

20

the printer are in one machine case.

77. The voting system of claim 56further comprising at least one master tabulating machine for a precinct which reads the election ballot according to which the voter voted

with printed indication of the votes of the voter printed thereon for tabulation of the voters votes. 78. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein a master tabu

25

accept input of votes from the voter according to the election ballot,

lating machine is connected to a master network for[the] a

printed ballot as validfor counting by the meansfor tabulat ing the printed ballots. 8]. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped with a meansfor marking a voter veri?ed ballot as invalidated. 82. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped with a means for marking a

store the votes of the voter; 30

35

translation ofthe election ballot and the votes ofthe voter so that saidprinted ballot and the votes ofthe voter are read able in braille.

40

one or more voting stations comprising: 45

operation of one or more computer programs; 50

(c) one or more computer programs which operate in a

computer to:

55

60

store the votes of the voter in the computer; print the votes of the voter so that the votes of the voter are readable by the voter and comparable by the voter with the votes the voter input; accept input of the voter as to whether the printed votes are acceptable or unacceptable; and record the votes stored in the computer which are

acceptable; and a meansfor tabulating the acceptable votes ofthe voter

(d) decision by the voter as to whether a printed ballot is

tion.

(b) a printer connected to said computer for printing the votes of the votor;

present the election ballot for voting; accept input of the votes from the voter;

election ballot,

(e) submission of an acceptable printed ballot for tabula

(a) at least one computer with at least one display device, at least one device to accept voting input

from a voter, and su?icient memory to provide for the

temporarily store the votes of the voter; (b) printing of the votes of the voterfrom the votes tempo

acceptable or unacceptable; and

puter; (f) submission of the acceptable printed votes; and (g) tabulation of the acceptable recorded and/or accept able printed votes.

ballot comprising the steps of'

rarily stored in the computerfor the voting station; (c) comparison by the voter of the printed votes with the votes temporarily stored in the computer for the voting station;

rectness and comparison with the votes the voter input; (d) decision by the voter as to whether the printed votes are acceptable or unacceptable;

94. A self-veri?1ing voting system comprising:

85. A methodfor votingprovidingfor self-veri?cation ofa (a) voting by a voter using a computer voting station pro grammed to present an election ballot, accept input of votes from the voter according to the

(b) printing of the votes of the voter from the votes stored in the computerfor the voting station; (c) examination by the voter of the printed votes for cor

(e) recording of the acceptable votes stored in the com

printed ballot as invalidfor counting by the meansfor tabu lating the printed ballots. 83. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the meansfor tabulating the printed ballots generated by said one or more voting stations will accept only printed ballots which are validated by a ballot scanning machine. 84. The voting system of claim 56further comprising a braille printerfor embossing a printed ballot with a braille

ballot scanning machine. 93. A self-veri?ing voting method comprising the steps of' (a) voting by a voter using a computer voting station pro grammed to present an election ballot,

political subdivision conducting the Vote. 79. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped with a meansfor marking a voter veri?ed ballot as validated. 80. The voting system ofclaim 56 wherein the ballot scan ning machine is equipped with a means for marking a

votes of the voter temporarily stored in the computer for the voting station with the votes of the voter shown on the printed ballot which have been read to the computer by a

65

recorded and/orprinted in said one or more voting sta tions.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION PATENT NO.

: RE 40,449 E

Page 1 of 1

APPLICATION NO. : 11/062351

DATED INVENTOR(S)

: August 5, 2008 : Anthony I. Provitola

It is certified that error appears in the above-identi?ed patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shown below:

In column 4, line 46 of the Patent delete “vector” and insert --voter-- in its place. In column 4, line 64 of the Patent delete “vector” and insert --voter-- in its place. In Claim 49, column 9, line 36 of the Patent delete “vector” and insert --voter-- in its

place. In Claim 49, column 9, line 36 of the Patent delete “vector” and insert --voter-- in its

place.

Signed and Sealed this

Seventh Day of July, 2009

WWW JOHN DOLL

Acting Director ofthe United States Patent and Trademark O?ice

Auto-verifying voting system and voting method

Feb 14, 2005 - mechanical or electronic comparison of the printed ballot with the data stored from the voter input. The present invention has elements that may be consid ered to be covered generally by class 235, particularly sub class 51 covering machines employed for casting and count ing votes. BRIEF SUMMARY OF ...

1MB Sizes 1 Downloads 389 Views

Recommend Documents

Auto-verifying voting system and voting method
Feb 14, 2005 - in memory or on storage media. A printed ballot produced by the computer voting station which shows the votes of a voter is then presented to the voter and either compared by the voter, or by operation of the computer program for the v

A geodesic voting method for the segmentation of ...
used to extract the tubular aspect of the tree: surface models; centerline based .... The result of this voting scheme is what we can call the geodesic density. ... the left panel shows the geodesic density; the center panel shows the geodesic den-.

Voting Systems
Florida,. 1 and in 2004, the dispute over counting votes in Ohio sparked members of ... First, because of the Electoral College, George Bush won the election even though ... First, for a vote to count, all voters must cast an equally effective vote.

Voting Systems
... note 34, at 491; Unofficial Election Returns, THE DAILY MINING JOURNAL (Marquette, ... 53 A study using 1982 data found that, “[n]early 60% of all U.S. cities with .... a choice of vanilla or chocolate ice cream, and the customer chooses.

A geodesic voting method for the segmentation of tubular ... - Ceremade
This paper presents a geodesic voting method to segment tree structures, such as ... The vascular tree is a set of 4D minimal paths, giving 3D cen- terlines and ...

A geodesic voting method for the segmentation of tubular ... - Ceremade
branches, but it does not allow to extract the tubular aspect of the tree. Furthermore .... This means at each pixel the density of geodesics that pass over ... as threshold to extract the tree structure using the voting maps. Figure 1 (panel: second

Partisan Voting and Uncertainty
Sep 12, 2016 - being a major theme in the voting theory for decades in political science, .... the results of our analysis apply if we simply switch the roles of two ...

Oscar Voting System Poses Problems - WSJ.Feb2009
Feb 6, 2009 - Then, in another upside-down outcome, a movie can win for best picture even if .... of elections in the Numbers Guy blog. Complete Coverage: ... computer simulations to study how easily different systems can be manipulated.

Inferring Strategic Voting
16 We assume that voter beliefs over three-way ties are infinitesimal ..... the Japanese Diet and there is little variation in the roll call vote within a given party.

Voting Pads.pdf
identify which answers have come from which handset. To do this you must make a 'Participant List'. To make a 'Participant List' you will need the Device ID, ...

Voting Flier.pdf
the school election. 3. BRYAN HARMS AND LEANDRA FERNANDEZ FALL 2016. Does your vote count? High Tech Middle Chula Vista, 8th grade. Page 1 of 2 ...

Blockholder Voting
academic and regulatory debate (Coffee and Palia, 2015). In this paper, we study .... against management, and 13% publicly criticized management in the media. These forms of public ..... from a successful activism campaign. .... social welfare.

Electronic Voting
electronic voting systems: the “secure platform problem.” Cryptography is not the problem. Indeed, many wonderful cryptographic voting protocols have been proposed; see [2] for a sample bibliography. The problem is interfacing the voter to the cr

Blended Voting System Certification of Democracy ... - State of California
Aug 21, 2015 - o Adjudication Client, version 2.4.1.14601. • Premier ... o Premier GEMS Election Management System, version 1.18.24 ... 4.1 Programming and configuration of election management system/software, including audit.

Voting Precincts Map.pdf
KENNEDY. HARDWOOD CT. W WHEELER ST. E ARMITAGE ST. LINDEN. HEATHER LN. W BENNETT ST. SOPHIE ST. FIFTEENTH ST. E MICHIGAN AVE ... S ANDREWS ST. N HOOKER AVE. WILLOW DR. JOHNNY CAKE LN. BUSH. FOREST ST. MAPLECREST CT. JOHN GLENN CT. TENTH AVE. FOURTH A

Blended Voting System Certification of Democracy ... - State of California
Aug 21, 2015 - Kern County requested administrative approval of the Dominion Voting Systems, ... 4.1 Programming and configuration of election management system/software, including audit ... ballot tally program to the Secretary of State.

A distributed-responsibility electronic voting system
Internet, it has the advantages of easy access and speed of use that .... and personal and corporate interests, and one can never quite know what will happen ...

Subgroup Deliberation and Voting
For a given type j ∈ {H, D} and total number of signals ˜n, the conviction threshold T˜nj is an integer number that satisfies the following: β (p, T˜nj − 1, ˜n. ) .... Proof: The double inequality (7) is necessary and suffi cient for a juror

Candidate stability and voting correspondences - Springer Link
Jun 9, 2006 - Indeed, we see that, when candidates cannot vote and under different domains of preferences, candidate stability implies no harm and insignificance. We show that if candidates cannot vote and they compare sets according to their expecte

Voting Precincts Map.pdf
MACKIN AW R D. MILLARD RD. WOLF RD. WIN TERW OOD LN. ELEVENTH AVE. LINDAAVE. BARNARD AVE. BURKE AVE. NINTH AVE. FOURTEENTH ST.

Boonton Voting Wards_Districts.pdf
THIRD, FIRST. THIRD, SECOND. FOURTH, FIRST. FOURTH, SECOND. Page 1 of 1. Boonton Voting Wards_Districts.pdf. Boonton Voting Wards_Districts.pdf.

Voting Systems - State of California
Jan 10, 2017 - Each month, the Office of Voting Systems Technology Assessment (OVSTA) provides an update on Election Assistance Commission (EAC) and ...

Spatial Approval Voting
The data sets analysed in this article are available on the Political Analysis web site. 1 ... original experimental data from the French 2002 presidential election. 2 ... Approval Voting rule once the whole profile of approval ballots (the above.

Voting on Road Congestion Policy
therefore, that they should be part of "policy packages" that include not only ..... easy to show that, even after accounting for feedback effects due to the reduction ...