Columbia FDI Perspectives Perspectives on topical foreign direct investment issues No. 180 August 15, 2016 Editor-in-Chief: Karl P. Sauvant ([email protected]) Managing Editor: Maree Newson ([email protected])

An International Investment Court: panacea or purgatory? by M. Sornarajah * The proposal for an International Investment Court is a red herring. The central issue is whether investment treaties should exist at all. The secondary issue is whether, if they do, an Investment Court is better than the present settlement of disputes through arbitration. The first issue is the more important one. But since the second issue has been raised, it is best to stop the idea at the outset. Given the disenchantment with the present investor-state dispute-settlement (ISDS) system, the alternative suggested, especially in recent documents of the European Union (EU) in the context of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership negotiations, is a standing International Investment Tribunal. Does the idea cure the charges of illegitimacy leveled at the present ISDS system? The illegitimacy of ISDS flows, according to its critics, from the allegation that a select few arbitrators routinely decide disputes in favor of multinational enterprises in an ideologically prejudiced manner, articulating doctrines more extensively than agreed upon by governments negotiating the treaties, thereby also curtailing those governments’ regulatory functions. An Investment Court would not cure such illegitimacy. A Court would become a device for neoliberal rules of investment protection with even greater authority. Judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) have been sitting as investment arbitrators. A study of their record does not show that they avoid the prejudices of those arbitrators who had not also served as judges at such a high level. On the few occasions ICJ judges from developing countries sat on investment arbitration panels, they dissented from the (developed country) majority. 1 Having a minority of five judges from developing countries is no help. They are in a minority, even assuming those appointed are not already acculturated to the neoliberal vision. They could be strong-armed into complying with majority decisions. There is no indication as to the geographical areas they may come from or how they would be chosen.

Judges of domestic courts (the EU uses domestic courts as the model) are drawn from elite classes that have uniform views. Baroness Hale, Deputy President of the United Kingdom Supreme Court, has observed that most top English judges are white, male, attended the same elite universities, and specialized in commercial law.2 Apart from the lack of expertise in public law issues that abound in investment arbitration, these judges, of whatever court, most likely have the same ideological predispositions. Judges chosen from other EU countries are unlikely to be different. The affirmation of slanted positions in a more authoritative fashion is the likely outcome of an Investment Court. Take the existing European Court of Human Rights. It has dealt with the right to property, an issue featuring in investment arbitration. The European Convention on Human Rights did not originally include that right, since socialists had problems with it. It was included through the first protocol to the Convention. The Court’s interpretation of that provision indicates that it reserves the power to apply a proportionality test to any regulatory interference with property rights. The proportionality rule is now used in investment arbitration to overcome the rule that regulatory interference does not amount to compensable takings. Such creativity in favor of investment protection would become more intense through an Investment Court. Proportionality adds to indeterminacy and subjectivity. Critics argue that proportionality ensures that courts impede democratic state functions by arrogating to themselves a continuing power to review regulation. The establishment of an Investment Court would dissociate that Court from democratic control. As in the case of other permanent international tribunals, the Court would arrogate additional powers and create regimes through precedents in the area in which it operates. Academic opinion supports such creative expansion into the constitutionalization of fragmented law. The danger is that neoliberal principles will become set in stone beyond the power of democratic processes. To date, there is no doctrine of precedent in investment arbitration. This will not be so when there is a permanent judicial body. The EU proposal suggests that an International Investment Court is not different from a domestic court. If so, why not permit existing domestic courts to perform the function of deciding investment disputes? They are more familiar with the circumstances in which a state interfered with foreign investments and can assess the fairness of the interference in its political and social context more effectively. This is the way chosen in South Africa and Brazil. Domestic courts are part of a democratic system. In the face of the experience of investment arbitration, the proposal to set up an Investment Court will enhance the worst features of the existing ISDS system.

*

M. Sornarajah ([email protected]) is CJ Koh Professor of Law at the National University of Singapore. The author is grateful to Anna Joubin-Bret, David Schneiderman and one anonymous reviewer for their helpful peer reviews. The views expressed by the author of this Perspective do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Columbia University or its partners and supporters. Columbia FDI Perspectives (ISSN 2158-3579) is a peer-reviewed series. 1 Judge Shahabuddeen in Malaysian Historical Salvors, SDN, BHD v. Malaysia, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/10, Annulment Tribunal (Apr. 16, 2009); Judge ad hoc Abi-Saab in Abaclat and others v.

2

Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/5, Dissenting Opinion to Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (Aug. 4, 2011). 2 Brenda Hale, “Kuttan Menon memorial lecture: Equality in the judiciary,” Feb. 21, 2013, available at https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-130221.pdf. These views were echoed by the late Justice Scalia in Obergefell v. Hodges 576 U.S. (2015), dissenting, p. 6. The material in this Perspective may be reprinted if accompanied by the following acknowledgment: “M. Sornarajah, ‘An International Investment Court: panacea or purgatory?,’ Columbia FDI Perspectives, No. 180, August 15, 2016. Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (www.ccsi.columbia.edu).” A copy should kindly be sent to the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment at [email protected]. For further information, including information regarding submission to the Perspectives, please contact: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment, Daniel Allman, [email protected]. The Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI), a joint center of Columbia Law School and the Earth Institute at Columbia University, is a leading applied research center and forum dedicated to the study, practice and discussion of sustainable international investment. Our mission is to develop and disseminate practical approaches and solutions, as well as to analyze topical policy-oriented issues, in order to maximize the impact of international investment for sustainable development. The Center undertakes its mission through interdisciplinary research, advisory projects, multi-stakeholder dialogue, educational programs, and the development of resources and tools. For more information, visit us at http://www.ccsi.columbia.edu. Most recent Columbia FDI Perspectives • • • • •

No. 179, Francesca Spigarelli and Ping Lv, “Chinese FDI in the EU: learning from the renewable energy sector,” August 1, 2016. No. 178, Mark Feldman, Rodrigo Monardes Vignolo and Cristián Rodríguez Chiffelle, “The Pacific Rim as a platform for international investment law harmonization,” July 18, 2016. No. 177, Stephan W. Schill, “Changing geography: prospects for Asian actors as global rule-makers in international investment law,” July 4, 2016. No. 176, Anthea Roberts and Richard Braddock, “Protecting public welfare regulation through joint treaty party control: a ChAFTA innovation,” June 20, 2016. No. 175, Umirdinov Alisher, “The case for an advisory center on international investment law,” June 6, 2016.

All previous FDI Perspectives are available at http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdiperspectives/.

3

An International Investment Court - Columbia Center on Sustainable ...

Aug 15, 2016 - system, the alternative suggested, especially in recent documents of the European Union. (EU) in the context ... attended the same elite universities, and specialized in commercial law.2 Apart from the ... programs, and the development of resources and tools. For more ... energy sector,” August 1, 2016. • No.

201KB Sizes 0 Downloads 195 Views

Recommend Documents

Columbia FDI Perspectives - Columbia Center on Sustainable ...
Sep 12, 2016 - 2 held itself “precluded from exercising jurisdiction” because “the initiation of this arbitration constitutes an .... programs, and the development of resources and tools. For more ... energy sector,” August 1, 2016. •. No.

The case for an advisory center on international investment law
Jun 6, 2016 - low-cost legal advice to developing and LDC members of the WTO. ... Capacity building for in-house lawyers and assisting host countries in the ...

Forced Liquidation of an Investment Portfolio - International Journal of ...
Author contact: Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of. California at .... solution to the Scholes liquidation problem, but does not allow us to ...

Think Again: International Trade - Columbia University
can help promote economic development in low-income countries—but only if ... Openness also affords access to the best technology and allows countries to ...

An Investment Worth Making
propose solutions to better prepare students, which include a strong emphasis on Career Technical. Education (CTE). To engage and prepare our students, we ...

An Investment Worth Making
propose solutions to better prepare students, which include a strong emphasis on Career Technical. Education (CTE). To engage and prepare our students, we ...

International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle ...
application of the theory of comparative advantage and the inter- national .... foreign counterparts on new product development (often mislead- ingly labeled ...

The International Center For Chemical.pdf
The International Center For Chemical.pdf. The International Center For Chemical.pdf. Open. Extract. Open with. Sign In. Main menu. Displaying The ...

Hayes v. Idaho Correctional Center - United States Court of Appeals ...
Mar 3, 2017 - The panel affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court's dismissal of a complaint pursuant to ... This summary constitutes no part of the opinion of the court. It has been prepared by court staff for the ..... intentional ac

International Investment Strategies & Key Investors ... -
energy technologies – including solar PV, wind power, concentrating solar thermal .... Suzlon has over 50 per cent share of the Indian wind energy market.

unit 16 international portfolio investment - eGyanKosh
Such type of restrictions can have significant impact on foreign trade, economic ..... and data processing technology facilitating low-cost information about foreign.

unit 16 international portfolio investment - eGyanKosh
bearing securities of a number of corporate enterprises belonging to different ..... classes in sync with the events likely to occur in both the short ran and long ran ...

Center for Sustainable Health Spending Data Brief - Altarum
this nonretail segment is not separated out in the CMS health accounts. ... The largest retail channels are chain stores but mail service has been growing most ...

The Indian Supreme Court and Secularism - East-West Center
eracy, and opportunities for higher education—all tend to promote the general ...... evoke a far from misogynist imagery from T.S. Eliot's The Wasteland).

The Indian Supreme Court and Secularism - East-West Center
urbanization, the break-up of the joint family system, greatly increased lit- eracy, and opportunities .... that the Indian state was not in the business of promoting freedom of reli- gion but .... Reporter [AIR] 1973 Supreme Court [SC] 1461), means

Adaptive Martingale Boosting - Columbia CS - Columbia University
Recall that the original martingale booster of Long and Servedio formulates the boosting process as a random walk; intuitively, as a random example progresses ...

Hayes v. Idaho Correctional Center - United States Court of Appeals ...
Mar 3, 2017 - COUNSEL. Harry Williams IV (argued), Law Office of Harry Williams, ..... documents cannot always be communicated by phone and should not .... 1 Portions of this concurrence are identical to portions of my concurrence in the ...

Maximizing Website Return on Investment:
helping site visitors to understand the company's products, services, or solutions, ... software can be worth thousands of dollars, it is essential that a website works .... 2 .5M/mo. 100K/mo. 5,000/mo. % web lead conversions to sales. 20%. 10%.

the effect of an international embargo on malnutrition ...
mortality accounting for malnutrition status and stratified by calendar period were .... During the embargo against Haiti, HHF services continued despite fuel .... were observed, we conducted power analyses with PASS 2005 software (15).